1 / 57

CONTENT: Few remarks on the non-scaling minimum emittance FFAG history.

CONTENT: Few remarks on the non-scaling minimum emittance FFAG history. Checking the tools: SYNCH, COSY, MAD8, TEAPOT. Scaling or non scaling, FODO or minimum emittance FFAG? Latest developments: Basic lattice parameters. Closed orbit offsets. Tracking results Magnet design.

eldora
Download Presentation

CONTENT: Few remarks on the non-scaling minimum emittance FFAG history.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONTENT: Few remarks on the non-scaling minimum emittance FFAG history. Checking the tools: SYNCH, COSY, MAD8, TEAPOT. Scaling or non scaling, FODO or minimum emittance FFAG? Latest developments: Basic lattice parameters. Closed orbit offsets. Tracking results Magnet design. Longitudinal simulation of the acceleration. Work to be done. 1 Dejan Trbojevic An Update on the FFAG Minimum Emittance Lattice with Distributed RFD. Trbojevic, J. S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, E. D. Courant, A. A. Garren, R. Palmer, and E. KeilThe FFAG2003 at KEK 7 – 11 July 2003

  2. 2 When did we start? • The first publication was from the Montauk workshop onSeptember 30, 1999: Trbojevic, D., Courant, E. D., and Garren, A.,FFAG Lattice Without Opposite Bends, Colliders and Collider Physics at the highest Energies, AIP CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Volume 530, Montauk, New York 1999, pp. 333-338, American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, 2000, Editor B.J. King. • Trbojevic, D., “FFAG lattice without opposite bends”, KEK Workshop on FFAG Synchrotrons,October 11, 2000. • Accelerator physics seminar talk at Brookhaven National Laboratory: Dejan Trbojevic, December 14, 2000: ”Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Lattice (FFAG) without Opposite Bends”. • Muon Collaboration Meeting at Berkeley, February 2, 2001. Dejan Trbojevic: “Some taught about recirculator”. • Collaboration Meeting Neutrino Factory at Brookhaven National Laboratory. • Trbojevic, D., Courant, E., Garren, A. “Fixed field alternating gradient lattice design without opposite bends”. Eighth European Particle Accelerator Conf. (EPAC’02), Paris, France,June 3-7, 2002, pgs. 1199-1202 (2002) BNL-69007. • PAC2003, Portland, Oregon, May 16, 2003, “FFAG LATTICE FOR MUON ACCELERATION WITH DISTRIBUTED RF”,D. Trbojevic, J.S. Berg, M.Blaskiewicz, E.D. Courant, R. Palmer, BNL, Upton, New York, A.A. Garren, LBL, Berkeley, California, USA. • FFAG update at the KEK workshop July 8, 2003.

  3. Required Range of Energies (or dp/p) the “central” energy or momentum po is in two examples presented later set to 15 GEV. The muon acceleration would be possible from 10 GeV up to 20 GeV. Aperture limitation is defined by the maximum value of the DISPERSION function: Dx < +/- 30 mm if the 0.5 < E/Eo < 1.5 then dp/p < +- 33.3% Dx < 90 mm Why is the minimum emittance lattice for the electronic storage rings relevant? The normalized dispersion amplitude corresponds to the <H>1/2 !!! 3 The basic idea has remained the same: Dx = Dxdp/p < 30 mm

  4. The minimum emittance lattice requires reduction of the function H: The normalized dispersion amplitude corresponds to the <H>1/2 Conditions are for the minimum of the betatron function bx and dispersion function Dx to have small values at the middle of the dipole (combined function dipole makes it even smaller). 4 The minimum emittance lattice: bmin= Ld/215 Dxmin=q*Ld/24

  5. 5 NSLS reduction of the emittance: 10 times

  6. 6 Normalized Dispersion Plotof the First Montauk 99 Design

  7. 7

  8. 8

  9. 9

  10. 10 Co = 100 meters ro=Co/2 p n= 0.5 Br = 50 Tm TEST data by different tools: Cyclotron made of five combined function dipoles u = x/ro

  11. 11 TEST data for different tools: Cyclotron

  12. 12 TEST data for different tools: a simple cyclotron

  13. 13 TEST data for different tools: a simple cyclotron

  14. 14 TEST data for different tools: a simple cyclotron

  15. 15

  16. 16 Scaling or non- scaling FFAG, Minimum emittance lattice or FODO? • Scaling FFAG properties: • Zero chromaticity. • Orbits parallel for different energies. • Large momentum acceptance. • Relatively large circumference. • Relatively large physical aperture. • RF:large aperture-follows the energy. • Tunes are fixed for all energies. • Negative momentum compaction. • Orbits of the high energy particles are at high field, low energy particles at low field. • Minimum emittance FFAG properties: • Chromaticity is changing. • Orbits not parallel. • Large momentum acceptance. • Relatively small circumference. • Relatively small physical aperture. • RF:small aperture-at the crest. • Tunes move 0.4->0.1 in basic cell. • Momentum compaction changes. • Orbits of the high energy particles are at high field, low energy particles at low field. • FODO or minimum emittance lattice? • For the same magnet properties larger circumference and larger Xco. • For the same dispersion [ Dx=Dx*dp/p ] and the same magnet smaller field and larger circumference. • The FODO has larger available free space.

  17. 17

  18. 18

  19. 19 Maximum of Dispersion function in the FODO cell:Dmax = [ L q ( 1 + 0.5 sin(F/2) ) ]/sin2(F/2) …(1)0.06 m = 2.707 (Ld+ 0.4 m) q … (2) [ L = Ld + L1, q = 2 p / Nd ] BRHO= 50.03 Tm ( E=15 GeV) Ld BF L1=0.4 m BD L FIX the Dx Dmax = 0.06 m = 2.707 ( Ld + 0.4 m) (ByLd / BRHO) Ld = [-0.4 +-SQRT(0.42+4*0.158)]/2.0 if By=7 T Ld(m) By(T) q=By Ld/BRHO Nd=2p/q C =L Nd (m) 0.245 7 0.0339 ~183 118.0 0.274 6 0.0329 ~191 128.5 1.00 0.793 0.0158 396 554.0 0.50 2.464 0.0246 255 230.0 0.50 2.095 0.0209 300 270.0

  20. 21

  21. 22

  22. 23

  23. 24 0.087 4.87

  24. 25

  25. 26 Two CELLS:

  26. 27

  27. 28 Maximae of the betatron functions during acceleration

  28. 29

  29. 30

  30. 31 Progress in the Minimum Emittance FFAG lattice design: • 1999-2001 - Dynamical aperture was reduced due to sextupoles. • October 2002: the small opposite bend was introduced: • This change allowed removal of the sextupoles. • Very large dynamical aperture. • The tunes are changing but between 0.4-0.1 in the basic cell. • January 2003: Additional defocusing quadrupoles are removed and a larger area for the cavity placement was provided. • The lattice became extremely simple and easy to analyze. • The analytical solutions showed problems with the available codes. • May 2003: Both magnets are complete combined function magnets. • The acceleration requires either additional harmonic or reduction of the path length difference. • The magnets required for this latest design are being investigated by the magnet division at Brookhaven Natioanl Laboratory. It looks like there are simple solutions.

  31. 32 qQF bmax qQD bmin

  32. 33

  33. 20

  34. 34

  35. 35 +- ~50 mm

  36. 36

  37. 37

  38. 38

  39. 39

  40. 40

  41. 41

  42. 42

  43. 43 Tracking results with COSY at the central momentum 3 cm 5 cm

  44. 44

  45. 45

  46. 46

  47. 47

  48. 48

  49. 49

  50. 50

More Related