220 likes | 489 Views
How Natural Family Planning Fits into the Title X Program OFP Family Planning Research Grantee Meeting January 14-15, 2009 Washington, DC . Jule Hallerdin, MN, MPH, CNM Nurse Consultant Office Family Planning Office of Population Affairs. Family Planning and Public Health. 1800-1900
E N D
How Natural Family Planning Fits into the Title X ProgramOFP Family Planning Research Grantee MeetingJanuary 14-15, 2009 Washington, DC Jule Hallerdin, MN, MPH, CNM Nurse Consultant Office Family Planning Office of Population Affairs
Family Planning and Public Health • 1800-1900 • Family size declined from 7.0 to 3.5 • 1900 • Six to nine of every 1000 women died in childbirth • One in five children died during the first 5 years of life • Public Health facts from : • Achievements in Public Health, 1900-1999: Family Planning CDC MMR December 03, 1999 / 48(47); 1073-1080
Family Planning and Public Health • 1900 • Distributing information and counseling patients about contraception and contraception devices was illegal under federal and state laws • The timing of ovulation, the length of the fertile period and other reproductive facts were unknown
Family Planning and Public Health • 1912 • The modern birth-control movement began • Margaret Sanger initiated efforts to circulate information about and provide access to contraception • 1916 • Sanger challenged the laws that suppressed the distribution of family planning information by opening the first family planning clinic in Brooklyn, New York
Family Planning and Public Health • The police closed her clinic, but the court challenges that followed established a legal precedent that allowed physicians to provide advice on contraception for health reasons • 1930’s- a few state health departments and public hospitals had begun to provide family planning services
Family Planning and Public Health • 1940-1957 • Family size increased average number of children per family peaked at 3.7 • 1960- the era of of modern contraception began – birth control pill and Intrauterine device became available
Family Planning and Public Health • 1965- Pill became the most popular method followed by the condom and contraceptive sterilization • 1965 Supreme Court (Griswold vs Connecticut) struck down stat laws prohibiting contraceptive use by married couples
History of Natural Family Planning in OFP • Office of Family Planning: • Guided by the Law, Regulations, and Guidelines: • Congress enacted the Family Planning Services and Population Research Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-572), which added Title X, “Population Research and Voluntary Family Planning Programs” to the Public Health Service Act.
Natural Family Planning • Section 1001 of the Act authorizes grants “to assist in the establishment and operation of voluntary family planning projects which shall offer a broad range of acceptable and effective family planning methods and services (including natural family planning methods, infertility services and services for adolescents)”
Natural Family Planning • The mission of Title X is to provide individuals the information and means to exercise personal choice in determining the number and spacing of their children.
Natural Family Planning • Natural Family Planning was one of the topics for which family planning research was solicited from 1985-1998: • Topics included: • Family Planning client behavior • Adolescent family planning clients • Male family planning clients • Targeting of family planning services • Clinic personnel behavior • Organization and management of family planning services • Role of private physicians • Natural family planning • Infertility services • Counseling services
1989 John R. Weeks Factors Affecting the Choice of Natural Family Planning 1989 Don Kramer Natural Family Planning Program Format Effectiveness Natural Family PlanningTitle X Service Delivery Improvement projects on the topic of Natural Family Planning:
Natural Family Planning Program Format Effectiveness • 1989- Don Kramer • Summary of findings: • Team Teaching format 36% more cost efficient than the Creighton Model for instructing clients in the Ovulation method of NFP. • Actual cost of service delivery for the Team Teaching format client was 64% of the cost of a Creighton model format client • Both formats produced extremely similar results, in a broad array of relevant outcome variables, including continuation and pregnancy rates.
Factors Affecting the Choice of Natural Family Planning • 1989-John Weeks • Summary of findings: • Private OB/GYN physicians were the least informed about NFP, and just over one-third knew about all three methods. • NFP-only providers had the most knowledge, while clinic providers and administrators were in between. • The single most identifiable barrier to the availability of NFP is skepticism among physicians about its use and effectiveness.
Examples of Title X Training Centers Focus on NFP • Region VII Development Systems, Inc.Kansas City, MO • NFP and Fertility Awareness: A conference call discussion for Title X clinicians about non-hormonal contraception - held 4/10/08
Examples of Title X Training Centers Focus on NFP • Region III -TRAINING 3, Family Planning Council, Inc.Philadelphia, PA • Planning a 2 hour on-line interactive training for clinicians on Fertility Awareness – projected date 6/30/09
How Natural Family Planning Fits into the Title X Program • NFP is a statutory requirement (FP Method) • NFP is not widely used • Need to find out why the method is not used more • Provide accurate information to providers that will enhance provision of NFP counseling
Review of Program Goals for NFP Grantees • Contribute to: • Improved health outcomes • Increased utilization of preventive health care- particularly among vulnerable and special needs populations • Increasing the proportion of pregnancies that are intended
Natural Family Planning • Questions?