640 likes | 654 Views
This article explores different foreign policy paradigms, such as hegemonism, realism, isolationism, and liberalism, and their implications for US foreign policy. It also examines the challenges facing the United States in today's world, including international terrorism, globalized economy, promoting democracy, and maintaining international peace. The search for a new foreign policy paradigm is discussed in the context of changing global dynamics and the need for a comprehensive and effective approach.
E N D
POLI 314: U.S. Foreign Policy Dr. Kevin Lasher
The Search for A New Foreign Policy Paradigm
Definitions • Foreign Policy Paradigm • Foreign Policy Logic • Grand Strategy It is the “big idea” of foreign and national security policy — the overarching concept that links ends, ways and means, the organizing principle that allows a country to purposively plan and prioritize the use of all instruments of national power.
Cold War 1947-1991
Truman Kennan Containment
Lens of Containment
Paradigm ? ? ? ? ? ?
Paradigm ? ? ? ? ? ?
Paradigm ? ? ? ? ? ?
Paradigm ? ? ? ? ? ?
The Search for a New "Paradigm" End of History U.S. Hegemony New World Order The New Isolationism Enlargement and Engagement
What are the Foreign Policy Challenges facing the United States Today? 1990s (before 9/11) _________________________________ Bush Era [after 9/11] Obama Era Trump Era
Rogue Nations IRAN North Korea
New Paradigms • Hegemonism • Realism • Isolationism • Liberalism • Liberal Internationalism • Radical Anti-Imperialism
Hegemonism • US as single superpower (preponderance) • Preserve US dominance into future • Use military, economic, cultural power to pursue US interests • Self-interested Pax Americana • Containment of China? • US must respond to terrorism
Hegemonism • US leadership is crucial • US needs to create stable int’l system • US serves its own and world interests; strong moral component • Clinton’s multilateral, “timid” version • Bush’s unilateral, assertive version
Hegemonism: Problems • Too costly in resources and lives • American public may not support • Cannot prevent rise of “challengers” • Create anti-US backlash • Containment of China is impractical • Era of empires is over • Need int’l cooperation to fight terrorism
Realism • International system is anarchic • Key actors are states, especially great powers • Survival/protection comes from power, especially military power • US must promote its own national interest • Pragmatic use of military power • Primary logic during Cold War (but not pure version)
Realism • Conflict, not war, is inevitable; “peace” through balance of power • Alliances and int’l institutions can be useful “tools” to be discarded when needed • Avoids inserting morality into foreign policy • Post-Cold War version
Realism: Problems • Realism in a unipolar world? • Does not explain democratization, globalization, interdependence • How to deal with terrorist threats from non-state actors? • Can US act as amoral nation? • Understanding and support of American people? • What are the true threats facing US ?
Isolationism • US should play a much smaller role in world affairs; abandon “superpower syndrome” • US should reduce its military role abroad • Use military for direct security threats • US seek “normal” economic and political interaction with rest of world
Isolationism: Why? • Declinism: US cannot afford to maintain its “superpower role” • Come Home America: US needs to focus on long-ignored domestic problems • Insoluble problems: US cannot “solve” may current international problems
Isolationism: Problems • Rejects any remnant of American idealism • Can other countries “fill the gap” left by American withdrawal? • Short-term benefits, long-term costs • Security threats to America still exist • Economic dependence on national security spending • Does it address terrorism question?
Liberalism • Wilsonianism or Idealism • US should actively promote the growth of democracy and free markets; promote human rights and self-determination • Use economic, political, and military tools to support democracy and free markets • Establish viable collective security system