1 / 27

PUD No. 1 of Clallam County In Association with Clallam County

PUD No. 1 of Clallam County In Association with Clallam County. Sewer Facilities Plan for Carlsborg UGA. PRE – DRAFT June 2009. Proposed Land Use. 1. Sewer System for Entire UGA. 2. Initial Sewer Facilities. 3. Projected Wastewater Flows In gallons per day. 4.

emmanuel-maddox
Download Presentation

PUD No. 1 of Clallam County In Association with Clallam County

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PUD No. 1 of Clallam CountyIn Association with Clallam County Sewer Facilities Plan for Carlsborg UGA PRE – DRAFT June 2009

  2. Proposed Land Use 1

  3. Sewer System for Entire UGA 2

  4. Initial Sewer Facilities 3

  5. Projected Wastewater FlowsIn gallons per day 4

  6. Alternatives ConsideredCollect & Transmit to City of Sequim for Treatment & Disposal 5

  7. Recommended Alternative 6

  8. Estimate of Project Costs Estimated Total Construction Costs $10,950,000 Estimated Project Cost Elements $ 4,020,000 Total Estimated Project Costs $14,970,000 7

  9. Estimate of Project Cost Components Interceptor Sewers $5,030,000 Collector Sewers $2,600,000 Treatment Structures $2,610,000 Treatment Process $2,630,000 Reuse Distribution $ 800,000 Surplus Water Disposal $1,300,000 Estimated Total $14,970,000 8

  10. Treatment Facilities on PUD Operations Center Site 9

  11. SBR Layout 10

  12. Conversion of SBR Structures into MBR process 11

  13. Reuse Facilities 12

  14. Surplus Reclaimed Water Disposal on County Site along Matriotti Creek 13

  15. Section through Percolation Basin 14

  16. Percolation Basin Plan 15

  17. Assumed Funding Estimated Total Project Cost $14,970,000 Less Federal, State & Local Grants $ 5,000,000 Local Utility District Assessments $ 9,970,000 16

  18. Property Assessment Assumptions • Individual parcels will be assessed for benefit received from sewer service • Assessment for any parcel will not exceed the benefit received • Initial Sewer Service Area = about 120 tax parcels • Final Assessments will differ from Preliminary Assessments • Final will use actual costs and funding, not estimates 17

  19. Conceptual Assessment Methodology • Approach 1 – Assessments ratio to special benefit • Total Special Benefit for All Parcels • Compare Total Benefit with Total to be Assessed • Ratio Parcel Assessment • Special Benefit x Ratio 18

  20. Conceptual Assessment Methodology (cont.) • Approach 2 – Assessment computed from unit costs • Define Unit Cost for Each Project Component • Identify Component Units for each parcel • Assessment = Sum of Component Units x Unit Price Verify that result is less than Special Benefit 19

  21. Estimated Range of Typical Preliminary Assessments Single Family Home on small lot $13,000 to $22,000 Single Family Home on large lot $25,000 to $50,000 Small Commercial Business $18,000 to $75,000 Large Commercial Business $80,000 to $200,000 Vacant & Undeveloped Acreage $100,000 to $150,000 per acre 20

  22. Suggest LUD Formation Process • Property Owners request sewer service • Public Hearing to discuss providing sewers • If sufficient interest, PUD Commissioners adopt Resolution of Intent to Form an LUD • Apply for funding from various federal and state sources • Prepare preliminary assessment roll • Property Owner petition for LUD • LUD Formation Hearing • If sufficient interest, PUD Commissioners form LUD 21

  23. Estimated Monthly Service ChargeFor SBR Facility Note: Costs estimated in constant 2009 dollars 22

  24. Proposed Schedule Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Carlsborg…………Aug 09 Complete BA, Hydrogeologic, Archeological, NEPA…Sep 09 Facilities Plan Completion…………………………….Oct 09 LUD Notice of Intent………………………………....Nov 09 Start engineering design & permits Preliminary Assess & LUD Formation Environmental Review & Approval………………….Oct 10 Engineering Design Completion……………………..Nov 10 Construction Funding………………………………..Dec 10 Start of Construction………………………………....Jan 11 Completion of Construction…………………………May 12 Beginning of Sewer Service…………………………..June 12 Initial Assessment Payment Due…………………….Oct 12 23

  25. Letter of Concurrence Objective • EPA must issue a letter of concurrence before DOE can approve Facilities Plan or release funding • Concurrence: Project ‘Not Likely to Affect’ • Listed or Threatened Species • Provides ‘Net Environmental Benefit’ 24

  26. Federal Consultation Process • Letter of Concurrence follows Consultation with Federal Agencies • Review of Facilities Plan with NEPA, Biological Assessment, Hydrogeological Evaluation and Archeological Study • Reviewing Agencies besides EPA include: • US Fish and Wildlife • Corps of Engineers • NOAA 25

  27. Potential Environmental Concerns • Nitrates: • nitrification – denitrificantion reduction to <5 mg/L • Phosphates: • filtered by soil/vegetation from percolation basin to Matriotti Creek • Temperature: • reuse water cooled by fountain, percolation & vegetation shade • Pharmaceuticals: • SBR will remove more than existing onsite systems. MBR will remove more than SBR because of longer solids holding. Residual will be below medicinal dose & not affect humans. May still be a concern for aquatic life. 26

More Related