1 / 3

SVD software meeting summary 15-Mar., 2006

SVD software meeting summary 15-Mar., 2006. Alignment (A.Kibayashi) software (T.Hara). Alignment (A.Kibayashi). She estimate IP resolution and correlation of helix parameters of exp.49 data using alignment constant obtained from exp.48 w/o TOF. Her report is placed at

eric-gould
Download Presentation

SVD software meeting summary 15-Mar., 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SVD software meeting summary15-Mar., 2006 • Alignment (A.Kibayashi) • software (T.Hara)

  2. Alignment (A.Kibayashi) She estimate IP resolution and correlation of helix parameters of exp.49 data using alignment constant obtained from exp.48 w/o TOF. Her report is placed at http://www.hp.phys.titech.ac.jp/atsuko/post/2006/0314 Surprisingly she finds no correlation between the helix parameters, which were seen in exp.47. This means that we can use cosmic ray data w/o TOF for alignment. Basically the IP resolution and helix parameter correlation/shift with the exp48 constant is consistent with those obtained with ver.33 constant which is used for exp.45/47 data. So we can use the ver33 constant for exp49 data. She is now looking into exp50 data taken recently.

  3. software status (T.Hara) Recently Ozaki-san asked us the difference of intrinsic resolution between Data and MC. He showed a comparison of the resolution between Data obtained byS.Fratina-san and those used in TRAK which are estimated from MC (according to Karim-san). What we have to understand is to know whether the MC intrinsic resolution reproduces data.According to S.Fratina-san, the resolution of data is worse than that of MC by ~20~30%, which is much bigger than the previous studies done by Matsubara-san for SVD1 (5%). The difference may attribute to the mis-alignment, but is not clear. BN794

More Related