280 likes | 298 Views
PLC Artifacts. Sendera Ranch Elementary School. Work Samples-Kindergarten Writing. High. Medium. Low. -Action -Some Conventions -Some Voice -Detail is in the picture. -Action -Movement through time -Conventions -Voice. -Little Conventions -Few letter sound connections
E N D
PLC Artifacts Sendera Ranch Elementary School
Work Samples-Kindergarten Writing High Medium Low -Action -Some Conventions -Some Voice -Detail is in the picture -Action -Movement through time -Conventions -Voice -Little Conventions -Few letter sound connections -Detail is in the picture not the writing
Work Samples-Kindergarten Math High Medium Low -Able to add one more or subtract one less WITHOUT counters or a ten frame -Not able to add one more or subtract one less WITH counters and a ten frame -Able to add one more or subtract one less WITH counters and a ten frame
Work Samples-Kindergarten Science High Medium Low -Able to illustrate and write day/night activities with detail -Able to illustrate and write day/night activities -Able to illustrate and write day/night activities with guidance
Work Samples – First Grade Writing Medium -Writing connects many ideas -Sequencing of ideas -Use of capitalization -Starting to space more consistently -Spelling of sight words is more consistent
Work Samples – Fourth Grade Writing This was a high, she was able to give 3 reasons why Henry Ford impacted the community. Adrianna supported her reasons with evidence. She had an opening and closing paragraph.
Work Samples – Fourth Grade Writing Tieler was a medium because she only gave 2 reasons with support. She did divided her ideas into three paragraphs. In small groups Tieler is working on her sentence structure and spelling.
Work Samples – Fourth Grade Writing Isabella’s reasons were unclear. She did not use specific words to explain her reasoning. She is in small groups and after school tutorials to improve her spelling and sentence structure
Work Samples – 4th Grade Science Weathering and Erosion CER High Medium Low
Work Samples – 4th Grade Science • HIGH: • This student makes an accurate claim that includes grade level vocabulary. This student uses pictures as evidence. The student labels the pictures, and writes captions to describe the evidence that they will use. This student’s reasoning section shows deep thinking. Not only did they explain the labs, but the student revisits their hypothesis, stating, “my hypothesis was right because an experiment we had done before with gravel.” This student is making connections to this lab and a previous one, and offers an additional question she would like to investigate further. • MEDIUM: • This student offers an accurate claim, with grade level appropriate vocabulary. He includes pictures as his evidence, with labels, and a description of what he saw in his labs. The reasoning section is lacking here. He only restates his claim, and evidence, but does not dig deeper with making connections. He does state what he thought would happen, or make any generalizations. • LOW: • This is a low because although student makes a correct claim, it is unrelated to the key concept-water erosion. The evidence is lacking, specifically in regards to formations that may or may not be created from water erosion (canyons, deltas, etc). In the reasoning section, this student answers guiding questions, but does not form them in an organized manner. The student does not include grade level vocabulary, or use correct capitalization or punctuation.
DRA2 Text Level- BOY 30 28 Exceeding the Standard 39% 24 20 Meeting the Standard 36% 18 14 12 10 Below the Standard 26% 8 6 4
DRA2 Text Level- MOY 30 Exceeding the Standard 59% 28 24 Meeting the Standard 23% 20 18 16 Below the Standard 17% 10 AM-Tutoring LEP ARD-Dyslexia SST/STAR/LLI ARD-SP Ed. ARD-DNQ
4th Grade Math DataNovember Summative Two of the low TEKS are problem solving TEKS, which were dual coded on this assessment. 4.14D shows as low mastery, but it was tested with 4.11A, which was another weak area.
Matter 5th Grade Science Summative Assessments
5th Grade ELAGuided Reading Groups and Individual Conferencing