1 / 12

SSF report : recommendations about quality of life (capabilities)

Improvements in the measurement of quality of life and well-being in France Measuring Well-Being and Fostering the Progress of Societies – OECD meeting. SSF report : recommendations about quality of life (capabilities). Quality of life depends on people’s objective conditions and capabilities

evan-mcpherson
Download Presentation

SSF report : recommendations about quality of life (capabilities)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improvements in the measurement of quality of life and well-being in FranceMeasuring Well-Being and Fostering the Progress of Societies – OECD meeting

  2. SSF report : recommendations about quality of life (capabilities) • Quality of life depends on people’s objective conditions and capabilities • Quality of life indicators should assess inequalities in a comprehensive way • Surveys should be designed to assess the links between various quality-of-life domains for each person • this information should be used when designing policies in various fields • Statistical offices should provide information needed to aggregate across quality-of-life dimensions, allowing the construction of different indexes Subjective well-being - OECD

  3. SSF report : recommendations about quality of life (well-being) • Measures of both objective and subjective well-being provide key information about people’s quality of life. • Statistical offices should incorporate questions to capture people’s life evaluations, hedonic experiences and priorities in their surveys. Subjective well-being - OECD

  4. Dimensions of the QoL recommended by the SSF and the Franco-German reports • Dimensions that we consider relevant to capabilities • Material living conditions • Health • Education • Productive and valued activities • Governance and basic rights • Leisure and social interactions • Natural and living environment • Economic and physical safety • Overall experience of life that we consider closer to outcomes • Specific literature • More direct action of policy makers Subjective well-being - OECD

  5. The quality of Life Survey Gathering questions of existing surveys to cover most dimensions in the same questionnaire Living conditions : EQLS 2007, EU-SILC Environment and insecurity :EQLS 2007, EU-SILC Labour satisfaction in productive activities : EQLS 2007 and taking into account the recommendations of the French « collège Risques psychosociaux » Health : EU-SILC WHO5 module about mental equilibrium Confidence in society and in public decision-makers : adaptation of EQLS 2007 Welfare : Gallup’s type question Subjective well-being - OECD

  6. Construction of synthetic indicators by dimension • Computation of scores by addition of binary items (privations) in the same dimension. As usual, this method assumes that : • items provide useful information for the dimension • cumulating hides specificities of given items • bad quality of life in the dimension increases with the number of « privations » • addition is an easy way of computation • When items have a good correlation, the weighting scheme has no impact on the result • A person cumulating enough privations has a poor quality of life in the corresponding dimension : • the indicator equals « 1 » when the score exceeds a given threshold • … with the question of the determination of the level of the threshold • About 10% of the individuals Subjective well-being - OECD

  7. Example : rich vs. poor people Subjective well-being - OECD

  8. Welfare • A usual question : « what about your life, on a scale from 0 to 10, from the worst to the best possible ?» • The scale from 0 to 10 corresponds to the OECD recommendations • Socio-demographic explanatory variables • Strong increase with the decile of income from D01 to the median • More satisfaction before 25 and after 65 and with High diploma • Less satisfaction in greater Paris • No effect of gender and country of birth Subjective well-being - OECD

  9. Welfare Low welfare (0 to 4) High welfare (9 to 10) Housing - + Material difficulties -- + Health - + - Mental equilibrium -- + -- Social links -- ++ - Insecurities - Environment Confidence in society Welfare and Quality of life Subjective well-being - OECD

  10. Welfare Low welfare (0 to 4) High welfare (9 to 10) Income D01(-) D09 (+) D10(+) D10(+) Age More than 65(+) Diploma More than Bac (+) Gender Family composition Many adults (+) Many adults (+) Born in France Geographic position Welfare and Quality of life Subjective well-being - OECD

  11. Conclusion • Specific importance of QoL indicators to determine at-risk populations • Interest of taking into account some QoL dimensions to understand individual welfare • Conditioned with them, socio-demographic variables have few significance • Importance of mental equilibrium and social links : these topics are not often present in usual questionnaires • Further to be considered between QoL and welfare • Confirm the results with a classical survey • Take into account individual heterogeneity of preferences to interpret results as causalities rather than correlations Subjective well-being - OECD

  12. Thank you for your attention Subjective well-being - OECD

More Related