490 likes | 639 Views
Israel’s Telecommunications. Towards Competitive Advantage Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications rosenned@moc.gov.il. Presentation Agenda. Networks & Services Competitive areas: Cellular telephony International Telecommunications The “Second Wave” of Competition:
E N D
Israel’sTelecommunications Towards Competitive Advantage Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications rosenned@moc.gov.il
Presentation Agenda • Networks & Services • Competitive areas: • Cellular telephony • International Telecommunications • The “Second Wave” of Competition: • Telecommunications • Broadcasting • Manufacturing Industry
Israel's Telecommunications • 2.8 million main telephone lines • (47% penetration). • 2.5 million cellular customers, on three networks: Pelephone, Cellcom & Partner/Orange. • (42% penetration). • 1.1 million Cable-TV connected households. • (3 operators, 70% of passed households, 90% household coverage).
Telecommunications Services Market - 1998 Cable TV International Long-Distance Internet services Terminal Equipment & Business Systems 2% 2% 7% Cellular Telephony 11% 38% Fixed Services 40% Total telecom services market ~ $ 3.7 billion
The Cellular Boom:Israel Telecommunications Services Revenues, 1995-1998 ($US M) 2,000 Fixed 1,500 Cellular 1,000 International 500 CATV 0 1995 1996 1997 1998
Existing Regulatory Environment • Separation between regulation and operation (since 1984). Regulation responsibility - Ministry of Communications. • General operating licenses issued to Bezeq, cellular operators & facility based international long distance service providers. • Special licenses issued by the Ministry of Communications, for value added services. • Exclusive rights of Bezeq in fixed services canceled, as of 1 June 1999.
BezeqThe Israel Telecommunication Corp Ltd. • Israel’s national telecommunications operator. • Annual sales - NIS 9.3 billion. • 11,500 employees (8,500 in Bezeq, the mother company). • Bezeq pays 5% royalties on income. • Regulatory environment: • Price cap tariff regulation (CPI - X formula). • Universal service obligations.
Modern Fixed Network • 100% digital network. • #7 ISUP signaling. • Country-wide Euro ISDN. • AIN features. • SDH transmission. • Country-wide fiber deployment.
Cellular Operators • Pelephone: 800 MHz NAMPS and CDMA. Operations since 1987. Bezeq (50%), Motorola (50%). • Cellcom: 800 MHz TDMA. Operations since 1995. BellSouth (34%), Safra Brothers (34%), Discount Investments (12.5%), PEC (12.5%), private investors (7%). • Partner/Orange: 900 MHz GSM. Operations since October 1998. Hutchison (46.67%), Matab (20.31%), Elbit.com (16.5%), Tapuz (16.5%)
Cellular Telephony • High growth - 2.5 million subscribers, compared to 125,000 in January 1995. • Key expansion stimulators: • Low tariffs: ~ US $0.11 to 0.23/minute air time, ~ $11 to 29 monthly charge. (300 min average monthly bill - $56 to 74) • Calling Party Pays (CPP), in operation since 1994. • Nationwide coverage. • Competition.
International TelecommunicationsFacilities Based Competition Introduced July 1997
Facilities Based International Service Providers • Bezeq International (014) The incumbent carrier, 100% owned by Bezeq. • Two new carriers, operating since July, 1997: • Golden Lines (012) • STET, SouthWestern Bell, • Aurek, Globscom & Meitar/Kahn. • Barak (013) • Sprint, Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom, • Clalcom & Matav.
Dialing Parity Rules • Per-call carrier-selection prefixes (01X). For each of the international service providers. • Pre-selection - subscribers can choose a preferred provider for ‘00’ prefix and ’188’ international operator services. Pre-selections of existing subscribers that didn’t choose will be “re-allocated” between operators. • Competitive practices - services & consumers’ data provided by Bezeq to all operators on non-discriminatory basis.
Resulting MarketEnvironment • Highly competitive market, with low customer switching barriers. • Drastic cuts in retail tariffs(USA - 0.20$/min, UK - 0.18$/min, Japan - 0.30$/min). • International long distance calls - a commodity. • The incumbent carrier, Bezeq International, lost its dominant position (60% > billed minutes) within 70 days.
Submarine Optical Cables Infrastructure EMOS CIOS Cable RFCS Capacity EMOS 1990 280 Mb/s CIOS 1994 622 Mb/s LEV 1998 5 Gb/s FLAG 1999 5 Gb/s LEV FLAG
Internet Services • ~30 Internet service providers, 800,000 users, 300,000 dial-up & 2,000 directly connected customers, 18,000 domains. • Typical tariffs: • ~ $15 monthly fee, including 10 usage hours, ~ $1.5 for each additional hour. • Unlimited access at ~ $1 per day. • IIX (Israel Internet eXchange) domestic interconnection service. • High growth - prediction for 1.2 to 1.5 million users by year end 2000.
The Israel Internet 2 Network • Part of the global research network for the NGI (Next Generation Internet). • Connecting Israel to the forefront of scientific and industrial R&D, through: • StarTap - US NSF/I-2/NGI interconnection point. • Quantum - EC International test network (TEN-155). • Q-Med - Mediterranean consortia (Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy) Quantum extension. • 34 Mb/s connection to London, 45 Mb/s connection to Chicago (155/622 Mb/s - planned). • 10 Mb/s & 155 Mb/s domestic connectivity (622 Mb/s, 10Gb/s - planned).
Civilian Satellites • AMOS-1: TV distribution, SNG & VSAT • launched May 1996. • Geostationary orbit at 4o West. • 7 transponders, covering Middle East & Central Europe. • Designed, manufactured and controlled by Israel Aircraft Industries. • Gurwin-II TechSAT: communications, remote sensing & research • Launched July 1998. • 830 km altitude sun-synchronous circular orbit. • 50 kg, 3-axis stabilized Earth-pointing microsat. • Designed, manufactured and controlled by the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.
Competitive Environment • Wide competition in customer premise equipment and value added services. • Limited competition in cellular and international services. • Two monopoly areas: • Bezeq - Domestic fixed services (Infrastructure, transmission, data communications & telephony). • Cable TV operators - Multi-channel subscriber television.
New Regulatory Policy(Promoting competitive Advantage) • Competition in fixed services. • Structural change of the telecommunications sector: • Liberalization. • Privatization. • Re-regulation.
Competition Rules • Three tier market structure: • Mobile services (Cellular & PCS). • Fixed domestic services (infrastructure, transmission, data comm’s & telephony). • International services. • Facilities based competition. • Universal service obligations- including equal terms service offering requirement, at non-discriminatory tariffs. • Cross-ownership limitations, assuring fair competition.
Facilities based competition • New operators required to set up their own facilities. • No unbundling or co-location requirements on existing operators. • Interconnection rules, including tariffs, technical requirements, equal access and number portability.
1999 2000 & onwards • Pelephone • Cellcom • Partner/Orange • PCS operators • Pelephone • Cellcom • Partner/Orange • Bezeq • Competing • Operators: • Wireline • Wireless • Bezeq • Bezeq International • Barak • Golden Lines • Additional operators • Bezeq International • Barak • Golden Lines Israel’s Telecommunications Map 1994 Mobile Services • Pelephone Fixed Services (Infrastructure, Transmission & Telephony) • Bezeq International Long Distance Services • Bezeq
Proposed New Frequency Bands Allocations Band Application Allocation Year 800/900 MHz Cellular 30 MHz 1998 2 GHz PCS/UMTS 300 MHz up to 2005 2 GHz N-FWA/WLL 60 MHz 1999 3.5 GHz N-FWA/WLL 90 MHz 1999 26/28 GHz B-FWA/LMDS 1300 MHz 1999
Bezeq in the New Era • Structural regulation. • Universal service obligation. • Tariff controls, until market share in domestic services (Infrastructure, transmission, data services & telephony) falls bellow 60%. • Tariff re-balancing, dealing with access deficit and cross subsidies.
Bezeq Tariff Rebalancing - April 1999 • One step rate rebalancing, almost eliminating cross-subsidies between services (voice traffic still subsidized telephone access). • New price-cap regime - productivity gap (x-factor) of 7% (6% in 1999, will be adjusted if Bezeq output deviates from predictions). • 6% average rate decrease (21% decrease on voice traffic, 16% increase on fixed monthly payment. Typical tariffs - NIS 0.208 for local call, NIS 36.1 monthly payment, 532 NIS for line installation). • ROE (before tax) - 10.5%.
Interconnection Rates Interconnection Israel EU Tariff benchmarks Local 0.8 0.7-1 Urban Toll 1.3 1-2 National Toll 2.5 1.7-3 US cents, $1 = NIS 4.16
Bezeq Privatization • Bezeq shareholders: • Government of Israel - 54 %. • Cable & Wireless - 13%. • Remaining shares - publicly held. • Government’s holding shall be further reduced, in synchronization with market liberalization. • Government approval required for holding of more than 5%.
Broadcasting Networks • Radio - • Public radio - 7 national AM/FM radio stations, AM Arabic channel & world-wide short-wave service. • Commercial radio: 14 local FM radio stations. • Television - • Public channel (Channel 1). • Commercial channel (Channel 2). • Multi-channel subscriber TV - 3 regional cable TV operators, providing service over 550 MHz (50 channels) systems, including 7 self provided program channels.
“Open Sky” - NewBroadcasting Policy • Creating competitive broadcasting market. • Key policy ingredients - • Public broadcasting - new definitions (goals, structure, finance). • Commercial broadcasting - introduction of second commercial television channel & private country-wide radio stations. • Multi-channel subscriber television - introduction of direct broadcasting satellite, in competition with cable television. • Broadcasting digitization - radio & Television, terrestrial, cable television & satellite (DAB/DVB).
Competition inMulti-Channel Subscriber TV • DBS (Direct Broadcasting Satellite): • Digital system, ~60 cm receiving antennas. • Basic package of ~10 channels. • Additional pay channels/channel packages. • Local content obligations. • Local production of additional cable/satellite channels: • Israeli music. • News (2 channels). • Jewish heritage. • Immigration absorption. • Arabic channel.
Israel’s Electronics Industries • Combined 1998 sales - $8.1 billion, of which $6.6 billion were exports sales. • Highly skilled workforce - 45,000 employees, including over 27,000 engineers & technicians, 17,000 of them university graduates. • Output per employee - over $180,000.
Total 1998 Sales - $ 8.1 billion Industrial & Medical Systems 23% Telecommunications 40% Components 14% Defense Systems 23%
Industry Excellence Areas • Telecommunications - Internet, data communications, wireless, video & image processing, satellite communications, access networks, broadband, etc. • Semiconductor manufacturing equipment. • Defense systems - self developed main platforms, opto-electronics, radars, C4I, UAV (Unmanned Air Vehicles) & avionics.
Statistical Highlights Electronics All Other Industries Industries Exports [% of total sales] 81 25 Added value [%] 68 42 Engineers & technicians [%] 61 14 Employees in R&D [%] 12 2
Major R&D EffortsStretching Boundaries of Imagination & Ingenuity • Innovative synergistic industry-academy cooperation, supported by the Chief Scientist, Ministry of Industry & Trade. • Over 100 industrial & academic participants. • Focused on establishment of the technological infrastructure for the next generation. • Key telecommunications R&D activities: • Digital wireless • Satellite systems • Broadband telecommunications • Internet & Multimedia • Telemedicine • Microelectronics • Network management
Israel’s Regulatory Policy • Structural changes - achieving strategic advantage in competitive global markets. • Competition - the key for innovation, entrepreneurship, investment & growth. • Key action areas: • Liberalization. • Re-regulation. • Privatization.
Regulation Philosophy • Free and competitive markets promote growth, efficiency, customer satisfaction & economic advantage. • Market restructuring, in transition from monopoly to open and free market, during a short time period, requires active regulatory intervention. • Once competitive marketplace is achieved, strong regulator will provide unnecessary intervention, and should be abolished.
The End Thank you for your attention