110 likes | 352 Views
Abstracts. Created by Nyssa Bulkes. THE BASICS . 1-2 paragraphs 100-250 words Covers the main points of your paper as well as what your reader can expect to learn from your paper No surprises! The last thing you write in your research-paper writing process
E N D
Abstracts Created by Nyssa Bulkes
THE BASICS • 1-2 paragraphs • 100-250 words • Covers the main points of your paper as well as what your reader can expect to learn from your paper • No surprises! • The last thing you write in your research-paper writing process • Standards vary from journal to journal and from discipline to discipline
TWO KINDS • Results-driven abstract • Results are the focus; what can be deduced from results • Summary-driven abstract • Focus is the entire paper; summarizes each section in 1-2 sentences • Some journals ask for key words for searches
LINGUISTIC FEATURES • Verb tense • Present tense used for conclusions, what is to be done with results • In RP summary, present or present-perfect tense for opening statements of abstract • Active or passive • Active voice invites the researcher to be part of abstract • Passive eliminates the agent • 1stv. 3rd person verbs, use of pronouns • 1st person can make an abstract shorter, more lively “We conclude…” “We find that…” “We argue that…” • 3rd person adds distance, formality “The researchers conclude that…”
HOW TO DECIDE? • Read abstracts by scholars in your field • Refer to the journal you’re submitting a paper to • Ask an adviser
EXAMPLE 1 Version A • A count of sentence connectors in 12 academic papers produced 70 different connectors. These varied in frequency from 62 tokens (however) to single occurrences. Seventy-five percent of the 467 examples appeared in sentence-initial position. However, individual connectors varied considerably in position preference. Some (e,g., in addition) always occurred initially; in other cases (for example, therefore), they were placed after the subject more than 50% of the time. These findings suggest that a search for general rules for connector position may not be fruitful.
EXAMPLE 2 Version B • Although sentence connectors are a well-recognized feature of academic writing, little research has been undertaken on their positioning. In this study, we analyze the position of 467 connectors found in a sample of 12 research papers. Seventy-five percent of the connectors occurred at the beginning of sentences. However, individual connectors varied greatly in positional preference. Some, such as in addition, only occurred initially; others, such as therefore, occurred initially in only 40% of the cases. These preliminary findings suggest that general rules for connector position will prove elusive.
EXAMPLE 1 Results-driven abstract • A count of sentence connectors in 12 academic papers produced 70 different connectors. These varied in frequency from 62 tokens (however) to single occurrences. Seventy-five percent of the 467 examples appeared in sentence-initial position. However, individual connectors varied considerably in position preference. Some (e,g., in addition) always occurred initially; in other cases (for example, therefore), they were placed after the subject more than 50% of the time. These findings suggest that a search for general rules for connector position may not be fruitful.
EXAMPLE 2 Research-paper summary • Although sentence connectors are a well-recognized feature of academic writing, little research has been undertaken on their positioning (intro). In this study, we analyze the position of 467 connectors found in a sample of 12 research papers (methods).Seventy-five percent of the connectors occurred at the beginning of sentences. However, individual connectors varied greatly in positional preference (results). Some, such as in addition, only occurred initially; others, such as therefore, occurred initially in only 40% of the cases. These preliminary findings suggest that general rules for connector position will prove elusive (conclusion).
CONCLUSION • Decide whether research-paper summary or results-driven abstract is best for your paper • Refer to resources in your field • Familiarize yourself with the standards; inquire to specific journals about their expectations