1 / 16

Political dialogue

International Youth Conference Krushevo , 2 - 09 -2011 Political dialogue in the Western Balkan: pleasing the EU or a lesson learned? Malinka Ristevska Jordanova European Policy Institute - Skopje. Political dialogue . Levels: International Multilateral Bilateral National

fergal
Download Presentation

Political dialogue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Youth ConferenceKrushevo, 2-09-2011Political dialogue in the Western Balkan: pleasing the EU or a lesson learned? MalinkaRistevskaJordanovaEuropean Policy Institute - Skopje

  2. Political dialogue Levels: • International • Multilateral • Bilateral • National • Position – opposition • Different groups - Inter-ethnic

  3. Post-conflict political dialogue • Concept of “fragile states” • Crucial - international involvement • Steps • High-level dialogue • CSO involvement – exploring options • Part of planning of peace- building, nation-building, state-building • Multi-level dialogue → national consensus

  4. EU and political dialogue • Internally: • Dialogue as a basis for consensus - Part of the ”embedded acquis” • Externalizing the values of the EU • Political dialogue – essential element of EU bilateral agreements • Promoting human rights and democratic principles through political dialogue

  5. Specifics Western Balkans • SAA: • Bilateral political dialogue EU – each country • Regional political dialogue • Bilateral political dialogue between countries • Normalization of relations

  6. Political dialogue – part of political criteria for EU accession? • CEE’s : • Bilateral political dialogue, Social dialogue, Intercultural dialogue… • But - no “political dialogue” • Exc. Cyprus 1998 “dialogue between communities”

  7. Political dialogue – part of SAP political criteria for EU accession? • Between the countries • Internal political dialogue • Inter-ethnic dialogue • Discussion: Differences between countries?

  8. Countries: Albania • Lack of political dialogue between political parties (EC Reports 1998-2010) • functioning of Parliament • Elections • Appointments → No candidacy

  9. Countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina • “Political dialogue” not in focus? • Functioning of the state • Political obstructionism • Forming a Government

  10. Countries: Croatia • Political dialogue with neighbours more in focus • “Dialogue between Croatian authorities and national minorities” – 2005 • Acceding country: political dialogue - no issue?

  11. Countries: Serbia • Political dialogue with Kosovo in focus • Parliament • Disputes between political parties • “Inflamatory, offensive” language? • Difficult agreement on Rules of Procedure

  12. Countries: Montenegro • Progress Report 2010: The overall commitment of parliamentary parties to respect parliamentary rules and to hold constructive policy dialogue, in particular on EU integration, remains a solid basis for further democratic development.

  13. Countries: Kosovo • 2007: There is no strategy for reconciliation andinter-community dialogue. • 2010: “Dialogue and reconciliation between communities and the protection and integration of minorities, particularly the Kosovo Serbs, are still areas of concern“

  14. Countries: Macedonia • Political dialogue - a critical point since 2006 • Basic meanings: • Dialogue between political parties • Parliament – cases: boycotts, Rules of Procedure, Election Law, Appointments • High-level dialogue – counter-argument: undermining the institutions • Dialogue on implementation of the Ohrid Agreement

  15. Conditionality and Compliance: the case of Macedonia • Technocratic/Utilitaristic Approach • Ticking the boxes • Compromising accession criteria for a compromise on the name issue?

  16. Further discussion: • Political dialogue as part of political culture • Does EU accession “automatically” solve the problem of lack of political dialogue? • Is it just a matter of time? • What to do?

More Related