E N D
Attention Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession of the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of though. Focalization, concentration, of consciousness are of its essence. It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others. William James (1890)
Attention Cognitive brain mechanism that facilitates processing
Taxonomy for Attention • Modality • Visual • Auditory • Control • Voluntary: intentional, endogenous, "top-down" • Reflexive: automatic, exogenous, "bottom-up" • Duration • Sustained • Momentary
Taxonomy for Attention • Modality • Control • Duration • Intensity • Focused • Selective • Divided
Attention Properties • Covert • Limited-capacity metaphors • Bottleneck • Early selection: prior to complete perceptual analysis of elementary features • Late selection: after to complete perceptual analysis of elementary features • Searchlight, spotlight, flashlight • Resources • One capacity or many?
Attention Theory • Cherry • Cocktail party effect • Auditory selective attention • Dichotic listening paradigm
Attention Theory • Broadbent's (1958) information-processing model • Limited-capacity • Early-selection • Top-down • But, can't explain intrusion of unattended input
Attention Theory • Late-selection theories • Deutsch & Deutsch • Treisman • Unattended sensory input attenuated at early stage, but not filtered out • High priority unattended input can reach semantic analysis stage
Cognitive Psychologyof Visual-spatial Selective Attention • Eriksen Flanker Task • Posner Cueing Task • Treisman Visual Search Task • Wolfe Visual Search Task
Eriksen Flanker Task Congruent AAA Incongruent EAE Neutral XAX
Eriksen Flanker Task Incongruent E A E E A E E A E
Eriksen Flanker Task • Searchlight of spatial attention about 1 degree of visual angle
Posner Cueing Task • Voluntary orienting of selective attention • Costs and benefits of intended covert attention shifts
Other Cueing Tasks • Reflexive orienting of selective attention • Abrupt onset visual stimulus at target location • Attentional "capture" • Time-dependent costs and benefits of unintended covert attention shift • Inhibition of return (>300 ms)
Treisman Visual Search Task • Preattentive • Pop-out search • Flat search function • Attentive • Conjunctive search • Serial search function • Moving spotlight • Guided • Conjunctive search of items that share a feature with the target
Wolfe Visual Search Task • Costs of voluntary control of attentional spotlight
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention Cortical or subcortical? • Need good temporal resolution to answer this question
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary auditory attention • Hillyard's N1 effect • Woldorff and Hillyard’s P20-50 and M20-50 effects
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary visual attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary visual attention • P1 effect for sustained covert attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary visual attention • P1 effect for cued covert attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Reflexive visual attention • P1 effect for cued automatic attention • Enhancement at short ISI • Inhibition at long ISI: Inhibition of return
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary visual attention • P1 effect for visual conjunction search
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • ERP and MRF Evidence • Voluntary visual attention • N2pc (posterior contralateral) effect for visual conjunction search
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Summary of ERP and MRF Evidence • Supports early-selection models • Sensory information enhanced/attenuated by attention to spatial location • Selection occurs at least as early as secondary sensory cortex • Similar effects for both voluntary and reflexive attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Functional Neuroimaging Evidence • Summary of PET studies of visual selective attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Functional Neuroimaging Evidence • Attention control • Posner and Petersen's (1990) anterior and posterior attention systems • Anterior - executive control • Posterior - spatial attention
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Functional Neuroimaging Evidence • Jovicich et al. (2001) attentional load during motion tracking • Parametric fMRI • Additive factors type methodology that fits polynomial functions to the experimental manipulation levels (L) • Brain Activity = a0 + a1L1+ a2L2+ a3L3 + ...
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Functional Neuroimaging Evidence • Hopfinger et al. (2000) spatial cueing study • Event-related fMRI • Top-down attentional control
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Animal Single-Unit Evidence • Cortical activity and voluntary orienting • Moran and Desimone (1985) • V4 neurons • Wurtz et al. (1982) • Parietal neurons
Neurophysiology of Spatial Selective Attention • Animal Single-Unit Evidence • Subcortical activity and reflexive orienting • Wurtz et al. (1982) • Superior colliculus neurons
Hemineglect And Extinction
Neglect Failure to acknowledge objects in the field contralateral to the lesion, without perceptual deficit.
Extinction • Failure to respond to stimuli in the contralesional field when presented simultaneously with an ipsilesional stimulus.
Patients with neglect may: • fail to dress the left side of their body • disclaim “ownership” of left limbs • not recognize familiar people presented on the left side • scan only the right side of a dream • deny the illness
Some studies observed that: • Shifting visual field by 10o to the right eases the symptoms for some minutes • Between 38% and 69% of patients recover within 3 months • Extinction tends to persist longer • Neglect deficit can be improved by increasing activation of the sustained attention system
Explanatory Hypotheses • LOSS OF ABILITY TO ANALYSE SPATIAL PATTERNS • Neglect occurs only with lesion on the right hemisphere. • ATTENTIONAL DEFICIT • Single cell recordings in monkeys indicate firing in posterior parietal cortex during attention tasks.
Explanatory Hypotheses • Arousal • Each side of the brain has separate activation mechanisms. • Representational • Neglect results from inability to form a representation of the whole space.
Explanatory Hypotheses • Orienting • Each hemisphere operates attention shifting to the opposite direction in both hemispaces. Hemineglect results from damage in one hemisphere.
Posner et al. (1984) Interpretation: Attention happens in 3 stages: disengagement shifting re-engagement
Posner et al. (1984) • Conclusions: • Temporal-parietal lobe is involved in contralesional disengagement • Engagement to the new target may rely on frontal sites
Raffal and Posner (1987) • Temporal-parietal junction e disengagement • Midbrain e shift • Thalamus e engagemant
Is there any processing in the neglected field?
Eglin et al. (1989) Neglect victims perform poorly at target detection on contralesional side, and performance worsens with presentation of stimuli to the ipsilesional side.
Volpe et al. (1979) Neglect patients can make ‘accurate’ same-different judgments between stimuli in the intact versus neglected visual field, even when they cannot identify the neglected item.
Grabowecky et al. (1993) Target detection in the neglected field is enhanced by increasing stimuli in the same field.
Neglect victims seem to process color, shape, and even meaning in the damaged hemifield, without ever being aware of the stimuli.
Does neglect affect visual memory?
Bisiach & Luzzatti (1978) Conclusion: Attention to material in visual-spatial memory is affected by damage in the parietal and posterior temporal lobes.