120 likes | 135 Views
Discover how the National Science Foundation utilizes advanced financial systems and strategies for effective management. Learn about the key principles and practices that drive financial success at NSF.
E N D
2003 AABPA Spring Symposium May 2 , 2003 Capital Hilton Hotel Washington, DC Don McCrory, DCFO, NSF
A word about NSF… • Independent Agency • Supports basic research and education ($4.5 billion) • Uses electronic grants mechanisms • Technology focused • National Science Board (audit committee)
Secrets of Success for Financial Management • Have a core financial operating strategy • It’s a “commitment” not a process. • Embrace E-Government. You can’t do it without systems. Period. • Hire good people with creative thoughts. • Accept risk and return. • Set a schedule to “fix” audit findings
NSF Financial System: Automated, integrated, and timely centralized reporting - 1975: NSF’s first automated finance system (Honeywell) (FAS) • 1983: moved FAS to HP • 1985 – 1990 : PC on every desk, local area networks, email, internet access • 1993: updated FAS to IBM Mainframe • 1998: Implement Enterprise Information System • 2001: Updated FAS to Client Server (18 months and on-budget)
Planning: Coordinate a comprehensive audit plan with management, the inspector general, and the independent public accountant • Effective Planning Requires: • Consultation with OIG • Agreement with OIG on Timeline Deliverables • Agreement with OMB (RMO and OFFM) on Timeline and Deliverables • Monthly Discussion of Timetables at ACC Meeting • Submission to OMB of Performance and Accountability Report (End Product)
Communicating: CFO/IG direct involvement to keep the process moving • Three Part Working Group Meetings to Handle Detail Issues (OIG, KPMG, and MGMT) • OIG Submits Audit Findings as Early as Possible, Even for the Current Fiscal Year, to Provide Management Time to Address /Rectify Issues, where Appropriate • Joint Oversight Visits to Grantees
Inform the decision-makers • EIS Integrated Budget and Performance Reporting • Ongoing • Revisions • Model for Integrating Budget and Performance (examples) • Dwell Time • Award and Size/Duration
Audit Committees: NSF has one, and its role is significant. • Established in Late 1997, Revised in 2000 • Monthly Meetings Throughout the Year Involving All Stakeholders • Incorporates All Effected Parties, i.e. CFO, CIO, IG, Auditors, General Counsel and etc.
NSF Audit process (Timely) • FY 2003 Accelerated Plans— • NSF/OIG Joint Memo to OMB Dated April 24, 2003 Covered: • Preliminary Performance and Accountability Report to KPMG—August 25, 2003 (3rd qtr results) • Close NSF’s Books — October 17, 2003 • Final Performance Measures in MD&A to KPMG – October 27, 2003 • Final Audit Report issued by KPMG - November 14, 2003 • Final GPRA Performance and Accountability Report—sent to OMB -November 17, 2003 (47 days after FY end)
Meeting the Challenges of Accelerated Reporting • Ending General Ledger Balances warehoused into an Access database outside of our main financial system. • Accrual / Adjusting entries posted in this Access database to generate Adjusted Ending Balances. • Adjusted Ending Balances closed utilizing an automated closing process (i.e., soft-close). • Financial Statements automatically generated utilizing crosswalk specifications. This process enables NSF to create interim financial statements efficiently without interfering with normal operations.
National Science Foundation“WHERE DISCOVERIES BEGIN” DMcCrory@nsf.gov (703) 292 - 8280 FY 2002 Performance Highlights http://www.nsf.gov/od/gpra/start.htm