1 / 15

A Potential paradigm for Emergency Management

A Potential paradigm for Emergency Management. Jessica Jensen North Dakota State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Emergency Management ja.jensen@ndsu.edu 701(231)-5762. Inspiration for presentation. Ritzer (1979) Integrated Sociological Paradigm Problem he addressed

fred
Download Presentation

A Potential paradigm for Emergency Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Potential paradigm for Emergency Management Jessica Jensen North Dakota State University Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Emergency Management ja.jensen@ndsu.edu 701(231)-5762

  2. Inspiration for presentation • Ritzer (1979) Integrated Sociological Paradigm • Problem he addressed • What was included • Why it failed • Why inspiring

  3. EM theory • Current state of affairs: • Lack of • Direction, focus, and clarity • Means of synthesis and integration • Framework • As a whole • Rudderless, no walking legs • Stunted development • For example…

  4. Theoretical issues • General theoretical issues confronting the area of study • Purview • Key concepts • Central questions • Identification/ownership of existing theory • Methods • Criteria for the establishment of new knowledge

  5. What can help? • The obvious • but not-so-simple • The not-so-obvious • but simpler

  6. Paradigms • Key authors and definitions • Simply • Philosophical or theoretical framework • “Way of seeing the world” • What it is not • A theory • Causal model • Everything to all people

  7. Paradigm building • Step One: • Determine what EM studies and tries to explain • Step Two: • Determine how to study and explain EM phenomena • Step Three: • Visualize • Step Four: • Use, refine and debate, discuss • And repeat

  8. What does EM study? • Area of study that examines how human beings, organizations, and government create, interact, and cope with hazards, risk, vulnerabilities, and associated events • Vis a Vis profession(s) of emergency management • EM phenomena

  9. Second Step: How to study and explain EM phenomena • Key concepts • Context • Macro and micro • Objective and subjective • Time and space bound • Dynamic nature

  10. Third Step: Possible visualization • Attention to handout

  11. Potential application in teaching • Help students • Generally • More specifically • Key concepts • Other factors • Change • Interdependence • Relationships • Help faculty

  12. Potential application in research • Conceptualization • Research design • Questions related to: • Any one aspect • Synthesis, integration • Dynamism • Change over time • Effectiveness and efficiency

  13. Methods: • Beyond single case study approach • Longitudinal • Historical analysis • Analysis

  14. Broader implications for discipline • Focus • A rudder • Purpose • Development

  15. Next steps • Use, refine • Debate, discuss • Repeat

More Related