290 likes | 399 Views
APPLICATION IN CLIMATOLOGY 1. IS GROWING PERSISTENCE OF ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION CONDUCIVE TO INCREASING INCIDENCE OF HEAT WAVES?. Radan HUTH, Jan KYSELÝ Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czech Republic. QUESTIONS TO ANSWER.
E N D
IS GROWING PERSISTENCE OF ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION CONDUCIVE TO INCREASING INCIDENCE OF HEAT WAVES? Radan HUTH, Jan KYSELÝ Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
QUESTIONS TO ANSWER • Which types of atmospheric circulation support the formation of heat waves? • Does higher persistence of atmospheric circulation imply higher temperatures / more intense heat waves?
DATA & METHODOLOGY • summer season (JJA) • whole 20th century (1901-2000) • daily mean temperature, 22 European stations • data sources: • ECA&D • MeteoSwiss • Camuffo & Jones, 2002
DATA & METHODOLOGY • heat waves (HWs): • at least 3 successive days with extreme surface temperature anomalies • extreme anomaly defined as 95th percentile for interval –30 to +30 days around the given day
DATA & METHODOLOGY • atmospheric circulation: Hess-Brezowsky (H&B) synoptic types • 29 types (+ 1 undetermined) • lifetime at least 3 days • mean residence time 4.3 to 6.2 days
DATA & METHODOLOGY • link between H&B types and HWs – evaluated in terms of efficiency coefficient = relative frequency of the type in HWs / its long-term mean frequency • null hypothesis: eff.coef. <= 1.0 • significance testing using block resampling
DATA & METHODOLOGY • effect of persistence – difference in anomalies between days 1-5 vs.>=6 in events lasting at least 6 days • event = uninterrupted sequence of the same type • done for each H&B type conducive to HWs • significance testing (null hypothesis: difference = 0) by Wilcoxon rank-sum test
with / without signif. effect of persistence central European high: HM H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence central European high: BM H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence easterly: HFA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence easterly: HNFA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence easterly: HFZ H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence easterly: HNFZ H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence southerly: TRW H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence southerly: SWA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence southerly: SWZ H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence southerly: SEA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence southerly: TB H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence north-east: NEA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence north-east: NEZ H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence other: WA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence other: NWA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence other: HNA H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
with / without signif. effect of persistence other: TRM H&B types conducive to HWs (eff.coeff. significantly > 1); infrequent types (freq. < 0.5%) omitted
temperature anomaly difference DAY6+ vs. DAY1-5, average over warm types (mean anomaly over +1C) 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.6 1.0
CONCLUSIONS • H&B types conducive to HWs • large regional differences • typical by • warm advection from SW-E • anticyclonic influence with positive radiation balance • 17 types at one station at least • larger-scale effect • central European high (HM, BM) • easterly anticyclonic • southerly
CONCLUSIONS • more persistent circulation (longer duration of circulation events) higher temperatures • end of warm circulation events tends to be warmer than their beginning • mean JJA difference DAY6+ minus DAY1-5 = 0.9 C • insensitive to the choice of threshold (4 or 6 days) • recently observed increase in circulation persistence – potential contributor to increasing frequency & severity of HWs