1 / 18

Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002

Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002. Our vision is an oil pipeline industry that --. conducts operations safely and with respect for the environment; respects the privilege to operate granted to it by the public; and

gene
Download Presentation

Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ensuring Success in Integrity ManagementMarty MathesonAmerican Petroleum InstituteJuly 24, 2002

  2. Our vision is an oil pipeline industry that -- • conducts operations safely and with respect for the environment; • respects the privilege to operate granted to it by the public; and • provides reliable transportation of the crude oil and refined products upon which America and all Americans rely.

  3. The History: Improving Record, 1968-2001 First six years, Annl Avg: 359 spills; 368,000 barrels Last six years, Annl Avg: 160 spills; 145,000 barrels Source: Allegro Energy Group from RSPA 7000-1. Updated 3/27/02.

  4. Overview --Measuring Effectiveness: • Understanding past performance • Creating new measures for future performance • Surveying operator plans for inspections • Identifying potential barriers to success and taking action

  5. Pipeline Performance Tracking System – A Voluntary Effort • Incidents down to 5 gallons • 20 cause categories based on ASME • Detail, detail, detail • Over 140,000 miles of pipe or more than 90% of regulated mileage • Infrastructure information • Miles by diameter • Miles by decade of construction, etc.

  6. New Infrastructure Data Elements • System Mileage By Commodity Transported • Crude oil • Refined products • HVLs • CO2 and other gases VALUE: Provides data for conducting analyses for separate aspects of the industry

  7. New Infrastructure Data Elements • System Mileage That “Could Affect” High Consequence Areas (line pipe) • Facilities That “Could Affect” High Consequence Areas (tanks, pumps, etc.) • VALUE: Trend analysis of incidents in HCAs versus incidents in non-HCAs

  8. New Infrastructure Data Elements • Mileage inspected by ILI • Corrosion or metal loss tool| Dent or deformation tool Crack or long seam defect tool | Any other ILI tool • Actions taken based on ILI • # Anomalies excavated and inspected | # Conditions identified and repaired | # “immediate repair condition” | # “60-day condition” | # “180-day condition” • Mileage inspected by pressure testing • Actions taken based on pressure testing • # Ruptures | # Leaks | # Test failures repaired • Mileage inspected by other techniques, direct assessment • VALUE: Provides for evaluating the effect of the IMP rules and of company integrity management programs

  9. New Infrastructure Data Elements • Total mileage assessed in calendar year • Total number of conditions repaired or otherwise mitigated • Total baseline assessments completed in calendar year • Risk assessment complete • Inspection complete (tools/hydro) • Information integrated • Repairs and mitigation complete VALUE: Provides means to evaluate progress toward specific IMP rulemaking goals

  10. New Incident Data Elements • Did this release reach any "high consequence areas“?  • If yes, specify below the types of HCA's affected and whether they were identified or not identified in your Integrity Management Program.  • Com. navigable waterway ___identified ___not identified • High population area ___identified ___not identified • Other populated area ___identified ___not identified • Unusually Sensitive Area – Water ___identified ___not identified • Unusually Sensitive Area – Ecol. ___identified ___not identified VALUE: Provides data for evaluating HCA definitions and their application

  11. What Should You Be Doing to Measure Performance? • Collect information about your integrity performance • Participate in PPTS • Collect consistent information even if you don’t participate in PPTS

  12. Survey of Company Plans on ILI • Over the 7 year baseline period • 112,000 miles included in the survey • 70% of interstate oil pipeline mileage regulated by OPS

  13. Context Information • Between 85-90% of oil pipeline mileage is currently capable of being inspecting using ILI technology • Does not represent all forms of inspection, just IL • No hydrotest or direct assessment information

  14. ILI Inspections – 1996 - 2008

  15. Projected ILI Demand – 2002 - 2008

  16. Potential Range of Annual ILI Demand

  17. Goals • More integrity assessments • In HCAs • Beyond HCAs • Improving integrity management within companies • Improving the government’s role in reviewing the adequacy of plans • Providing increased public assurance

  18. The History: Improving Record, 1968-2001 First six years, Annl Avg: 359 spills; 368,000 barrels Last six years, Annl Avg: 160 spills; 145,000 barrels Source: Allegro Energy Group from RSPA 7000-1. Updated 3/27/02.

More Related