1 / 12

Public Service Reform Program in Tanzania (PSRP)

Public Service Reform Program in Tanzania (PSRP). Medium Term Pay Policy. Tanzania - Few Facts. Population: 32,128,480 GNP per capita: $246 Growth: 4.6% Inflation: 7.9%. Tanzania an interesting case for pay reform. Classic collapse of the state Cost containment phase

Download Presentation

Public Service Reform Program in Tanzania (PSRP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Service Reform Program in Tanzania (PSRP) Medium Term Pay Policy

  2. Tanzania - Few Facts • Population: 32,128,480 • GNP per capita: $246 • Growth: 4.6% • Inflation: 7.9%

  3. Tanzania an interesting case for pay reform • Classic collapse of the state • Cost containment phase • Serious effort at civil service reform incorporating structural reform • Addressing pay issue as a key feature of its civil service reform

  4. What was the situation in Tanzania before the civil service reform (late 80s)? • Public expenditure framework expanded far beyond what GOT could afford • Public administration overstaffed/underfunded • Establishment/payroll control fell into disuse • Wage bill was out of control • Civil servants demotivated: • downward trends in real incomes • political interference in appointments and pay decisions • growing informality

  5. What did the first phase of the reform achieve? (1993-1999) • Medium term pay policy approved • Total number of employees reduced from 355,000 to 260,000 • Pay structure rationalized/decompressed from 9:1 to 21:1 • 75 % increase in average public service pay in real terms • Control on employment, wage bill institutionalized • central personnel database • computerized payroll system • ad hoc and non transparent allowances consolidated in basic salary

  6. The agenda for the Public Service Reform Program(2000-2004...)- Remaining issues • Workforce still too big for resources available • Cost containment issues not yet fully addressed • Capacity and performance undermined by low pay (informality continues) • The take home pay has not improved. Why? • New salary levels (1997) were below total monetary benefits enjoyed by the upper-middle and top levels • Changes in tax rates for personal income reduced net salary incomes • Annual salary adjustment too low

  7. Afocus on the Public Service Pay Policy • Primary Policy Goal: • long term: to raise the minimum base salary to the level of the minimum living wage (MLW) • minimize use of non-salary benefits • Implement performance-related pay system • Medium Term Policy Objectives: • enhance pay for technical and professional staff • develop core professional and managerial cadre

  8. The Pay Policy (cont’d) • Continue public service rationalization and efficiency measures • Promote rationalization of donor compensation for public servants • Improve personnel management practices

  9. What has been done so far • Pay reform implementation study: • wage-bill to GDP ratio of 4.9% to be adopted over the medium term • linkages pay/performance based on transparent appraisal system • new grade structure (fewer bands, multiple steps) • Local authorities to be strengthened to manage resources and personnel functions • new approach to donor supplementation of salaries or “local cost compensation”

  10. Local Cost Compensation or “donor supplementation” • Extent of donor supplementation: $50-100 million/FY99-00 • Effects of donor supplementation: • Unsustainable • Does not promote long term capacity • Reported as development expenditure therefore does not reflect true cost of delivering services

  11. How does Tanzania intend to deal with this issue? A proposal • Scheme to complement pay policy and to support an accelerated pace of salary enhancement for managerial, professional and technical personnel.

  12. Where does that leave Tanzania? • Pay reform is a slow process - need to target • Pay has improved but is still too low • How to finance local cost compensation? • HIPC? • MDRF? • Separate fund?

More Related