1 / 7

ERCOT Independent Review: CenterPoint Energy Houston Dynamic Reactive Project

ERCOT Independent Review: CenterPoint Energy Houston Dynamic Reactive Project. Jeff Billo. Background. In February CenterPoint Energy submitted a project to install additional dynamic reactive compensation in the Houston area for RPG review Issue:

gordy
Download Presentation

ERCOT Independent Review: CenterPoint Energy Houston Dynamic Reactive Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERCOT Independent Review:CenterPoint Energy Houston Dynamic Reactive Project Jeff Billo RPG

  2. Background • In February CenterPoint Energy submitted a project to install additional dynamic reactive compensation in the Houston area for RPG review • Issue: • 3-phase fault with delayed clearing (NERC Category D contingency) at multiple stations causes ~4000-5000 MW of load to trip on UVLS and generator terminal voltages to remain below 0.90 pu for >10 seconds • Project estimated to cost $125 million RPG

  3. ERCOT Independent Review • ERCOT verified CenterPoint Energy results • ERCOT worked with CenterPoint Energy to explore several project alternatives including: • Limiting import into Houston area • In order to meet criteria the import amount had to be significantly constrained below the study case level and only one generator dispatch combination produced acceptable results • Considered not feasible • Installing Single-phase, independently operated breakers • Would reduce but not eliminate the probability of 3-phase fault with delayed clearing • CenterPoint Energy would still consider 3-phase fault possible due to the fact that a potential common mode failure could still exist • Splitting buses in the Houston area • Decouple the system to limit impact of nearby faults • Multiple bus splits studied • “Split Option 4” of the W. A. Parish 345 kV station found to produce the best results from steady-state and stability studies RPG

  4. WAP Split Option 4 RPG

  5. WAP Split Option 4 RPG

  6. WAP Split Option 4 • Cost estimate: $11 million • Significant capital cost savings (> $100 million) • Will require outages at WAP 345 kV station • CenterPoint Energy has created preliminary outage plan which has been reviewed by ERCOT Outage Scheduling Department • Steady-state analysis (AC contingency analysis and UPLAN simulation) performed • Not expected to result in additional congestion under normal conditions after construction • Stability analysis performed • Expected to resolve initial stability concern well into the future • Conclusions: • ERCOT Independent Review will endorse WAP Split 4 • ERCOT will reclassify project as Tier 2 due to lower capital cost RPG

  7. Questions/ Comments? March 12, 2010 RPG

More Related