80 likes | 198 Views
Office of Science. Supported by. Status of the 2008 ASC TSG Run plan. College W&M Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA
E N D
Office of Science Supported by Status of the 2008 ASC TSG Run plan College W&M Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec Presented by D. A. Gates (J. Menard Deputy) At the NSTX Mid-run asessment PPPL April 16, 2008 1
XP-823 “Robustness of improved error field suppression in long-pulse discharges” – Day 1 GOAL: Extend optimal EFC to wider range of scenarios and IP STATUS – 1 run day so far for XP-823 Determine optimal n=3 EFC gain relative to IPF5 and/or IP • Re-verify existence of n=3 EF in IP=900kA reference discharge • STATUS: re-verified at 700kA with early H-mode. • n=3 EF was less apparent w/o early H-mode • Optimize n=3 EFC for two new plasma currents: 700kA and 1.2MA • STATUS: Optimal EFC current at 700kA was similar to level at 900kA Is EFCC proportional to IP? • Need to optimize at 1.1-1.2MA to determine proportionality – needs 6-8 shots Test combined n=3 EFC + n=1 RFA suppression for IP=0.7, 0.9, 1.2MA • Add n=1 feedback – 2 shots for each IP – use optimal 2007 gain & phase • STATUS: Worked well at 900kA, worked ok at 700kA but plasma still disrupted suggesting higher gain might be beneficial • Need data at 1.1-1.2MA – need 3-4 shots Day 1 2
XP-811 Vertical Stability Physics and Performance Limits in Tokamaks with Highly Elongated Plasmas • XP complete in 1/2 run day • Measured zmax , the maximum controllable vertical displacement, by turning of the plasma control and then tuning it back after the plasma had drifted vertically • Interim report written and distributed to the ITER team which was well received • “Dear David, Many thanks - the report makes very interesting reading and the work behind it is very valuable for us. Best Wishes, David Campbell” • Detailed analysis ongoing 3
XP-823 “Robustness of improved error field suppression in long-pulse discharges” - Day 2 STATUS – Day 2 plan has not yet been run – scheduled for April 28 Completing XP-823 may require additional 1.5 days vs. 1 day asked for Optimize n=1 RFA suppression controller • Reproduce 2007 900kA reference shots which used externally applied n=1 error field to trigger rotation collapse and disruption (3 shots) • Scan RWM control proportional gain until feedback system is unstable (4 shots) • Add LPF to control coil currents as necessary to avoid very large SPA currents • With gain at highest stable value, increase tLPF from 0 to: • 1ms, 3ms, 10ms, 30ms, 100ms (2 shots for each LPF) (10 shots) • For tLPF where AC RMS control power is reduced by factor 2-4, increase gain again and determine highest stable value (4 shots) • Test controller for two new plasma currents: 700kA and 1.2MA (4 shots) Day 2 4
XP-826 "X-point limiter plasmas" Goal: Investigate benefit of this configuration Status: Scheduled for review • Investigate plasma configurations where dominant lower X-point is brought very close to, or possibly outside, the outer divertor plate • Possible alternative way to reduce divertor heat flux • Assess access to H-mode, energy confinement and heat flux on divertor • The initial experiment is planned to be run before lithium coating • If successful, perform a second round with lithium on the lower divertor 5
XP-8** - Impact of 2 LITER system on long-pulse discharges STATUS – XP has not been run – waiting for dual LITER – requests 1.5 days • Goal is to determine if usage of 2 LITER system can: • Eliminate He glow, or reduce glow time to 5 mins • Will likely be done in boundary physics TSG XPs • Lower the electron density, and achieve density flat-top • Likely requires SGI to replace HFS gas • Increase the NBICD fraction of long-pulse discharges • Significant shot development will be needed to optimize low ne operation • Obtain sufficient flat-top duration to “measure” NICD profiles w/ VLOOP analysis • Methodology • Reduce/eliminate HFS gas by utilizing SGI – 0.5 days • Find lower bound of HFS pressure, incrementally add SGI • If/when plasma disrupts in ramp or early flat-top, optimize early shot phase to obtain flat-top sufficient for NBI-CD analysis – 1 days (optimistic!) • Vary beam timing and power • Vary plasma current ramp-rate and flat-top value • Vary early density/SGI fueling rate 6
XP-8** Parametric study of high elongation plasmas Goal: Investigate high elongation low-li scenario first developed in 2007 Status: Waiting for LITER • Use second LITER and experience gained to optimize wall conditions • Use n=1 feedback and n=3 correction to improve performance (higher ) • Previous attempts limited to N < 4 • Perform current and field scan to optimize non-inductive current fraction 7