520 likes | 686 Views
Barriers, Behavior Methods and Emergency Contraceptives. Anita L. Nelson, MD Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. Contemporary Forums . Conflict of Interest Disclosure Anita L. Nelson, MD. Learning Objectives. At the end of this presentation, the participant will be able to:
E N D
Barriers, Behavior Methods and Emergency Contraceptives Anita L. Nelson, MD Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Contemporary Forums
Learning Objectives At the end of this presentation, the participant will be able to: • Estimate underutilization of male condoms and suggest possible challenges to better use. • Counsel couples on fertility awareness methods. • Estimate the effectiveness of different methods of EC and their mechanisms of action.
“Ten months ago, I would have called this (the condom) aninvention of the devil, but now I find that its inventor must have been a man of good will ...”Jacques Casanova, 1758
Condom Use and Remaining Need • Worldwide, 6-9 billion condoms used each year • 24 billion condoms needed • Under-utilization not only from non-using couples but also from intermittent, inconsistent use by “condom users” Cecil M, et al. Contraception.2010;82(6) 489-90.
Male Condom • Typical first year failure rate: 17.4%; range 2-20% • Advantages: • Male participation u Protects well against STDs • Inexpensive u Cervical dysplasia reduced • Readily available • Special applications: • Premature ejaculation • Antisperm antibody • Female allergy to sperm Kost K, et al. Contraception. 2008;77(1):10-21.
Male Condom Update • Inconsistent use common1 • Many new sizes needed2 • New materials: polyisoprene • New incentives: ribbing, scents, vibrating rings • New market strategies: to women • New barriers: removed to locked cases • New biomarkers for failure3 • Addition of condoms to COCs could reduce STDs, unintended pregnancies and abortions4 1. Nelson AL, Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;164(6):1710-5. 2. Cecil M, et al. Contraception.2010;82(6) 489-90. 3. Walsh T, et al. Contraception. 2012;86(1):55-61. 4. Pazol K, et al. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(2):208-17.
STI Risk Reduction • Use of condoms reduces risks of infection • HIV • 80% reduction in transmission (male infected to female non-infected) • 28.6% fewer births of HIV-positive babies than use of nevirapine in first 72 hours (potential) • Gonorrhea and Chlamydia • Systematic review showed 80% reduction Nelson A. Chapter 12, Contraception, 1st ed. Blackwell Publishing, 2011.
STI Risk Reduction • Herpes Simplex Virus: • Failed Vaccine Trial: frequent use reduced HSV-2 risk by 25% • 18 month study: use of condoms >25% of time reduced HSV-2 acquisition risk 92% • HPV: Consistent use – incidence of infection reduced 70% Nelson A. Chapter 12, Contraception, 1st ed. Blackwell Publishing, 2011.
Consistent Condom Use Reported by Women Who Had Sexual Intercourse in the Prior 14 Days by Coital Activity * Cochran-Armitage test for trend over number of acts of coitus: p=0.001 Nelson AL. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;194(6):1710-6.
Reasons Given for Not Using a Condom Nelson AL. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;194(6):1710-6.
Reasons Given for Not Using a Condom (cont’d) Nelson AL. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;194(6):1710-6.
Other Worrisome Reasons Offered for Non-Use of Condoms • “Too drunk” • “He wanted me to use EC” • “I do not know how to use it” • “I did not think about it” • “I see the same person” • “In a rush” • “I never check” • “He told me to get on the pill”
The Top 5 Reasons For Not Using A Condom 1. “I didn’t know him well enough to ask him to use one.” 2. “After two months, I knew we were in love, so we stopped using them.” 3. “He would get mad at me if I asked him to.” 4. “He’s from Kansas, so I know he’s disease-free.” 5. “We don’t like them.” Real excuses collected by the PPLA clinic in Santa Monica, 1993.
The Top 12 Reasons For Not Using A Condom 6. “I know I should, but...” 7. “I’m on the pill.” 8. “Well, I did once!” 9. “He’s too big for the condom to fit.” 10. “I’m in a monogamous relationship.” 11. “We didn’t have any.” 12. “S/He looked clean.” Real excuses collected by the PPLA clinic in Santa Monica, 1993.
The Top 18 Reasons For Not Using A Condom 13. “She’s a virgin.” 14. “You can’t get AIDS from a woman.” 15. “He worked for TRW. He must be clean.” 16. “Well, I already have herpes and warts.” 17. “I’m not in a high-risk group.” 18. “I can’t feel anything when we use them.” Real excuses collected by the PPLA clinic in Santa Monica, 1993.
Male Condoms: Sizes • Snug fitting • Beyond7, Studded Beyond 7, Exotica Snugger Fit, LifeStyles Snugger Fit, Trojan Ultra Fit • Larger size—more headroom • Trojan Ultra Pleasure, Trojan Very Sensitive, Bareback, Trojan Her Pleasure, Midnight Desire, Pleasure Plus, LifeStyles Xtra Pleasure, Inspiral, Durex Enhanced Pleasure, LifeStyles Natural Feeling • Larger size—roomy from top to bottom • Maxx, Trojan Large, Magnum XL, Magnum, Durex Maximum, LifeStyles Large, Avanti, Crown, Trojan Supra
Need for New Condom Sizes • French clinical condom trial, 2003: • 39% said latex condom too small or too large • US Survey 2009: 1661 men • 17% condoms too long • 12% condom too short • 32% too tight • 10% too loose • Australia: 3/5 reasons: Too tight, too short, too loose Cecil M, et al. Contraception.2010;82(6) 489-90.
Male Condoms: Other Characteristics • Sensitivity, texture, extra strength, desensitizing, pleasure producing, flavor/scent, color, lubrication • Desensitizing condoms with “climax control lubricant featuring benzocaine that helps prolong sexual pleasure and aids in prevention of premature ejaculation” (Durex Performax, Trojan Extended Pleasure) • Spermicidally lubricated condoms
Female Barrier Update • Contraceptive sponge variably available • Female condom FC2 (nitrile) • Use of female vs. male condom • Less ejaculation, less active coitus, shorter coital duration1 • New female condoms under development • SILCs diaphragm • 2 day method • Standard days method with beads 1. Haddad L, et al. Contraception.2012;86(4) 391-6.
Contraceptive Sponge • Approved by FDA in 1983, withdrawn in 1994, and reapproved in 2005 • Disposable polyurethane foam disk containing 1 gram N-9 • Single use device moistened and placed high in vault to cover cervix • Mechanisms of action: spermicide (24 hours) plus device absorbs semen and blocks cervix
Female Condom – Take 2: FC2 • Made of nitrile (synthetic latex) FDA approved • Reduced cost compared to FC1 • Still more expensive than male condom • Comparable to FC1 in breakage, invagination, slippage and misdirection, efficacy, ease of insertion, comfort and overall experience • Internationally, other female condoms: • The Reddy Condom • National Sensation Panty Condom Schwartz J. The Female Patient. 2009;34:26-9.
Fertility Awareness Methods • Ovulation detection methods often combined to increase effectiveness: • Calendar • Basal body temperature • Cervical mucus • Sympto-thermal • Cervical palpation • Post ovulation • Typical failure rate: 25.3% Kost K, et al. Contraception. 2008;77(1):10-21.
Calendar or Rhythm Method • Collect information about menses from at least 6 months of experience • Assumptions: • Sperm vulnerable for 3 days • Ovum vulnerable for 24 hours • Luteal phase lasts 14 +/- 2 days • Formulas used to calculate at risk days: • Cycle day [length of shortest cycle – 18] toCycle day [length or longest cycle – 11] • On average 13 days of abstinence/month • Provides 67.8% of coverage of peak risk days
Calculation of Fertile Period Day 1 = First day of menstrual bleeding. Hatcher RA, et al. Contraceptive Tech.18th Ed. New York: Ardent Media, 2004
Newer Methods to Identify At-Risk Days • Standard Days Methods with CycleBeads • 2-day method • Persona (not available in US) • Computer program • OV-Watch® • Urinary ovulation kits • Not recommended–too late!
Color coded string of beads helps women identify days of cycle pregnancy is likely and unlikely Cycle Beads
2-Day Method • Simplified Billings technique • Woman checks introital secretions daily and asks herself 2 questions: • Was I dry yesterday? • Am I dry today? • Only if the answers to both questions are yes is intercourse allowed • Failure rates comparable to other FAMs
Persona • Hand-held ovulation detection monitor • Not available in US • Enter menses each month • Check each day: indicator light provides direction • Red/Green – obvious interpretation • Yellow – dip test strip in urine to detect LH and E3G levels • Light turns green or red • Over time, computer able to reduce number of uncertain (yellow light) days
Other Monitors • Lady Free Biotester • Hand held microscope to check saliva for ferning • OV-Watch® Fertility Predictor • Wrist computer • Analyzes chloride ions in perspiration on wrist during sleep • Surge in chloride ions occurs 6 days prior to ovulation • Message on watch: “Fertile Day 01 – 06”
Lactational Amenorrhea • Support women inclined to nurse their newborns • Sexual activity, contraception will not affect nursing • Benefit to mother • Bonding with newborn • Protection against ovarian, premenopausal breast cancer • Lower cost than formula • Benefit to newborn • Perfectly balanced nutrition • Bonding with mother • Reduction in newborn allergies and infections
Contraceptive Sexual Practices • Withdrawal. • Rectal intercourse. • Oral intercourse. • Other.
LNG-only ECSingle-dose Versus 2-dose Regimens • No differences seen in nausea, vomiting, dizziness, lower abdominal pain, or heavy menses. Arowojolu AO, et al. Contraception. 2002;66:269-73.
LNG EC Mechanisms of Action • Cebus monkey: LNG EC inhibited or delayed ovulation. Once fertilization had taken place, EC did not prevent establishment of pregnancy 1 • Human: LNG administered during luteul phase did not cause significant endometrial changes 2 • Human: LNG EC blocks or delays ovulation, due either to prevention or delay of LH surge, rather than inhibiting implantation 3 1. Ortiz ME, et al. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1352-6. 2. von Hertzen H, et al. FamPlannPerspect. 1996;28:52-7,88. 3. Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:341-8.
LNG EC Mechanisms of Action • 99 women • Ovulation (day 0) calculated from LH, E2 and P4 levels obtained just prior to EC ingestion • Cycle day of IC derived from patient history • No pregnancies occurred when IC occurred day -5 to day -2 and EC taken before or on day 0 • 4-5 pregnancies expected, 0 occurred • All pregnancies occurred when IC was day -1 to day 0 and EC was day +2 • 3-4 pregnancies expected, 3 occurred Novikova N, et al. Contraception2007;75:112-8.
Cycle Phase: Endocrinological vs Patient Estimate Novikova N, et al. Contraception.2007;75:112-8.
Meloxicam 15mg Boosts LNG-EC Efficacy • Cox-2 inhibitor added to LNG-EC • Cyclo-oxygenase (Cox-2) catalyses final step of PG synthesis needed for follicle rupture MassaiMR,et al. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(2):434-9.
Challenges of OTC EC • Patient has to pay out of pocket for LNG EC • Many pharmacies do not carry • 2008 telephone survey of all 1460 pharmacies in LA County as sham adult patient • 69% had EC available • 19% referred “elsewhere” • 12% said nothing could be done or hung up Nelson AL, et al. Contraception.2009;79(3):206-10.
Challenges of OTC EC • Misinformation provided callers: • “Abortion Pill” • “Used to be available, isn’t anymore” • “Have to be 21 to buy” • “Only women can buy” • “You could be pregnant if you had sex last night” • “Have to take within 12 hours” • “Have to take within 24 hours” • “Have to wait 48 hours to take” Nelson AL, et al. Contraception.2009;79(3):206-10.
Challenges of OTC EC • Unprofessional comments made: • “You could use it, or you could have a beautiful little baby” • “Why aren’t you on the pill?” • “Are you married or single?” • “Have you had sex before?” • “How long have you known him? • “Did he ejaculate inside you?” • “Did he come inside you?” Nelson AL, Jaime CM Contraception. 2009;79(3):206-10.
Ulipristal Acetate • Selective progesterone receptor modulator • 30 mg micronized version • Works as well as LNG in first 72 hours • May be given up to 120 hours • Prevents ovulation and fertilization • Works even after the luteinizing hormone surge has begun Fine P, et al. Obstet Gynecol.2010;115(2 Pt 1):257-63.
Ulipristal Acetate for Emergency Contraception • 1553 treatments of women 48-120 hours after unprotected intercourse • 30 mg Ulipristal acetate orally • Pregnancy rate • Overall 2.1% • 48-72 2.3% • 72-96 2.1% • 96-120 1.3% • Cycle length increased a mean of 2.8 days • Duration of bleeding did not change Fine P, et al. Obstet Gynecol.2010;115(2 Pt 1):257-63.
Ulipristal Acetate Ovulation Suppression up to 120 Hours • 34 women on ulipristal vs. 34 placebo with follicle ≥18mm • All women ovulated • Ulipristal given # Suppressed • Before LH surge start 8/8 • After LH rise before peak 11/14 • After LH peak 1/16 Brache V. et alHuman Reprod.2010 25:2256-63.
Ulipristal Acetate Adverse Events Fine P, et al. Obstet Gynecol.2010;115(2 Pt 1):257-63.
Overweight and Obese Women Have Higher EC Failure Rates with LNG-EC Glaiser A, et al. Contraception. 2011;84(4):363-7.
Remaining Issues for UPA:Role in Quick Start Protocols • Concern: Ulipristal acetate is a selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM). • Binds to progesterone receptor to block progesterone action • If provide pharmacologic doses of progestin in contraceptive near time of administration of SPRM, will that diminish effect of SPRM?
Copper IUD for EC • 8400 postcoital copper IUD placements1 • Pregnancy rate 0.1% to 0.7% • Prospective trial: 1963 CuT380A placements within 120 hours 2 • No pregnancies; No PID • 94.3% parous women continued at 12 months • 88.2% nulliparous women continued for 1 year • Chinese trial: 1933 women within 120 hours 3 • Pregnancy rate: 0.13% 1. Trussell J, et al. Fertil Control Rev. 1995;4: 8-11. 2. Wu S, et al. BJOG.2010;117:1205-10. 3. Bilian X. Contraception.2007;75:S31-4.