230 likes | 341 Views
Promoting and Monitoring Synergy Between Trade and Environment in Lebanon’s. Agricultural Products Where Methyl Bromide is Used. Promoting and Monitoring Synergy Between Trade and Environment in Lebanon.
E N D
Promoting and Monitoring Synergy Between Trade and Environment in Lebanon’s Agricultural Products Where Methyl Bromide is Used
Promoting and Monitoring Synergy Between Trade and Environment in Lebanon • Funded by the UNEP- UNCTAD Capacity Building Task Force on Trade, Development, and Environment • Managed by UNDP • Executed by the Ministry of Environment
Criteria for Selecting the Sector • Socio-economic importance (GDP, Labor) • Impact on environment • Impact on Natural Resources • Trade liberalization impact
Agricultural Sector • Socio-economic importance • 12% of GDP • 9.4% of labor • Balanced development • Impact on the environment • Water pollution from agrochemicals • Soil pollution from agrochemicals • Ozone depletion (ODS from methyl bromide) • Impact on natural resources • Largest consumer of water resources • Impact of trade liberalization on the agriculture sector • Negative impact: prices increase for net importer of agriculture products • Positive impact: little subsidies on export crops
Alternatives to Methyl Bromide Projects • Fundedby: Multilateral Fund of the Montreal Protocol • Managedby:UNDP, UNIDO • Executedby:Ministry of Environment • Objective:Phasing out “Methyl Bromide” in Lebanon by 2007 by proposing environmentally safe alternatives
Trade and Environment Project Sector-Specific Objectives The basic objectives of the project: • Perform an EIA of Alternatives • Perform a CBA of Alternatives • Study the impact of trade liberalization on the environment in the Agricultural sector where Methyl Bromide is used
Stakeholders • Public Sector • Ministry of Environment • Ministry of Agriculture • Ministry of Economy and Trade • Lebanese Agriculture Research Institution (LARI) • LIBNOR • Export Plus Program (export subsidy) • Chamber of Commerce • Private Sector • Farmers • Exporters • International Organizations and NGOs
Environmental ImpactAssessment • Chemical alternatives: • Dazomet, • Cadusafos • 1-3 Dichloropropene • Oxamyl • Non-Chemical Alternatives: • Soil Solarization • Bio Fumigation • Grafted Plants • Steaming: Negative pressure steaming and sheet steaming
Cost Benefit Analysis • The CBA was done on a one dunnum basis over a period of 20 years. • The 10% discount rate reflects an average between government and private bank credit interest rates. • CBA was tested under two scenarios: • Scenario1: average product prices (2000-2001) • Scenario2: 20% increase product prices
Cost Benefit Analysis Chemical alternatives: • Dazomet, • Cadusafos • 1-3 Dichloropropene • Oxamyl Non Chemical Alternatives • Soil Solarization • Bio Fumigation • Grafted Plants • Steaming: Negative pressure steaming and sheet steaming Mixed Alternatives • Solarization +1-3 Dichloropropene • Solarization + Oxamyl
Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Agricultural Sector • Positive impacts: • Potential new export markets (esp. Europe) • Increased marketable volumes • Increased exports • Increased farm income • Potential decrease rural migration
Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Agricultural Sector • Negative impacts • Over exploitation of land and resources • Chemical alternatives: • Possible soil and underground water contamination • Increased cost of cleaning the environment
Obstacles • Commercial: Archaic Channels of distribution, exploitation of the middle men. • Logistics: Lack of coordination • Trade • Lack of knowledge about Demand, Standards • Fierce competition from other countries (high subsidies low cost of production) • Financial:Lack of credit facilities, low prices of products • Infrastructure: irrigation problems • Human: Rural migration
Policies and Plan of Implementation • Emphasize competition based on “Quality” differentiation rather than a price based one: • Due to the high cost of production and high subsidies in regional countries the best alternative is to focus on quality differentiation rather than price driven competition. • Build on the Euro-Med agreement and the facilities it offers the agriculture products to promote exports to Europe (higher prices are accepted but European standards are required) • Inform stakeholders about European demand in terms of crops, SPS and TBT • Train stakeholders on standards required in terms of produce, packaging and labeling • Establish a network system for exports
Policies and Plan of Implementation • Design and implement a cooperation and coordination mechanism between stakeholders to increase efficiency. (public and private) • Propose schemes to improve quality and effectiveness of sectors related to packaging and transport • Design logistics to test products and grant “Ecolabels” • Enhance producers’ awareness on health, safety and environmental issues related to the “Process and Production Methods”