1 / 17

Dr. Roehlano M. Briones and Ivory Myka R. Galang Philippine Institute for Development Studies

ASSESSMENT OF PROSPECTIVE IMPACT OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES RESEARCH AT THE INDUSTRY LEVEL IN THE PHILIPPINES: THE CASE OF THE ACIAR – PCAARRD HORTICULTURE PROJECT. Dr. Roehlano M. Briones and Ivory Myka R. Galang Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Outline. Objectives

haleya
Download Presentation

Dr. Roehlano M. Briones and Ivory Myka R. Galang Philippine Institute for Development Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASSESSMENT OF PROSPECTIVE IMPACT OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES RESEARCH AT THE INDUSTRY LEVEL IN THE PHILIPPINES: THE CASE OF THE ACIAR – PCAARRD HORTICULTURE PROJECT Dr. RoehlanoM. Briones and Ivory Myka R. Galang Philippine Institute for Development Studies

  2. Outline • Objectives • Research and Development (R&D) • Assessment method • Results of the assessment • Analysis of the results

  3. Objectives • Analyze the contribution of the fruits and vegetables subsector in agricultural development. • Evaluate the potential impact of R&D on selected horticulture crops. • Draw implications for investment allocation and institutional framework for the agricultural R&D system.

  4. Research and Development • Budgetary allocation trend • Table 1. By Major Final Output (OPIF; World Bank ; in P millions)

  5. Research and Development • Budgetary allocation trend • Table 2. Breakdown of MFO 1 (OPIF; World Bank; in P millions)

  6. Research and Development • Investment in agricultural R&D • one of the major drivers of agricultural productivity. • Most of the agricultural research and development efforts (funding) come from the government agencies. • Agricultural research as a public good • Stakeholders (workers and farmers) are poor

  7. Research and Development • General trends • Table 3. Global public agricultural research-intensity ratios, 1981-2000

  8. Research and development • Public-sector agri research intensity ratio, 2002 • PHILIPPINES: 0.46 % • Higher than Vietnam [0.17 %], Indonesia [0.22 %], Laos [24%] • Lower than Malaysia [1.92 %] • Higher than the overall average for Asia (2000) : 0.41 % • Lower than the average for developing countries (2000) : 0.53 %

  9. Research and Development Source: David (1998)

  10. Assessment Method • Economic Surplus Approach • Change in economic surplus arises from farm productivity improvement due to innovation (k-shift), which propagates by a diffusion process • Together with research cost, permits calculation of measures of project worth • Net present value (NPV) • Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) • Internal rate of return (IRR)

  11. http://www.web-books.com/eLibrary/NC/B0/B63/032MB63.html

  12. Assessment method • K-shift  NPV, BCR, & IRR • Unable to get good estimates of k-shift Reverse • NPV, BCR, and IRR  threshold k-shift • minimum value to justify the amount invested in the research • NPV=0, BCR=1, IRR= discount rate A model named ‘welfare impact simulator for evaluating research’orWISER has been developed to automatically calculate the prospective impact of a new technology generated from fruit and vegetable R&D.

  13. Philippines Horticulture Program • Fruits • C1: Analysis of Papaya supply chain constraints • C2: Durian/Jackfruit Phytophthora Integrated Management • C3: Papaya Integrated Crop Management • C4: Improved and Sustainable Mango Value Chain • Vegetables • C1: Integrated soil and crop nutrient management • C2: Development of a cost-effective protected cropping system • C3: Management of bacterial wilt and other wilting diseases in Solanaceous crops • C4: Analysis of selected vegetable value chains • Fruits and vegetables • C5: Economic impacts of new technologies and policy constraints • Research cost: financing by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and in-kind contribution by the Philippines.

  14. Assessment method Assumptions to calibrate the diffusion process: • High adoption scenario • admax (maximum adoption): 20 % • adop20 (adoption after 20 years) : 15 % • Low adoption scenario • admax : 5 % • adop20 : 4 %

  15. Assessment method • Table 4. Research cost (over 4 years)

  16. Preliminary results • Table 5. Threshold k-shift estimates in percent NPV=0; BCR=1 (Evenson, 2003)

  17. Analysis of the Results • Modest levels of k-shift are needed to justify research investment • It is expected that the actual k-shifts of the research project would be higher than the k-shift estimates in this study. • The computed k-shifts can help the research stakeholders to potential benefit of research to society via farm-level productivity improvement

More Related