640 likes | 652 Views
This workshop delves into the dimensions of diversity in private higher education, addressing constitutional bans, participation rates, quality issues, and the role of the State. It examines the growth of private enrollment globally, highlights case studies of Korea, Ghana, and Latin America, and discusses potential benefits and risks. The presentation outlines the importance of private higher education in providing opportunities, complementing government funding, and catering to industry needs. It also examines equity and quality challenges, including diploma mills, franchise institutions, and unequal competition from corporate entities targeting developing nations. The role of the State in mitigating risks and promoting harmonious growth is emphasized, along with the need for a coherent national vision and regulatory framework.
E N D
Policy Workshop on Private Higher Education Damascus 8 December 2004
some dimensions of diversity • constitutional ban
some dimensions of diversity • constitutional ban • limited private
some dimensions of diversity • constitutional ban • limited private • significant participation
some dimensions of diversity • constitutional ban • limited private • significant participation • majority enrollment
share of private higher education enrolments Korea 75% Indonesia 65% Philippines 80% Colombia 60% Brazil 60%
growth of private enrollment in Latin America (1970 - 1994)
some dimensions of diversity • poor quality
some dimensions of diversity • poor quality • the best show in town
outline of the presentation... • the potential benefits of private higher education • the risks involved • the role of the State
outline of the presentation... • the potential benefits of private higher education • the risks involved • the role of the State
potential benefits • providing opportunities in constrained environment
potential benefits • providing opportunities in constrained environment • complementing government funding
knowledge is a key factor in explaining the difference between poverty and wealth
Korea vs. Ghana • Korea • 1950s: • growth of public tertiary education with tuition fees • 1960s: • government financial incentives to promote private tertiary sector growth • 1970s and 80s: • development of science and engineering programs • 1990s: • emphasis on quality assurance, R&D, accountability, performance-based funding
Ghana vs. Korea • Ghana • 1950s – 1970s • slow growth of “free” public tertiary education • 1980s: • initiation of reforms: quality, financial sustainability, expansion of public tertiary education • 1990s: • weak application of reform programs
Korea vs. Ghana • evolution 1960-2002 • enrollment rate • Korea: 2% in 1945 to 80% • Ghana: remained at 2% • private sector enrollment • Korea: 75% of total • Ghana: 6% of total • public expenditure per student • Korea: increase from $2,700 to $4,500 • Ghana: decrease from $1,200 to $850 • tertiary education linkages with economy and labor market • Korea: strong • Ghana: weak
potential benefits • providing opportunities in constrained environment • complementing government funding • being closer to employers needs
linkages with the productive sectors • management team • board with external representatives • practitioners as part-time professors • speed to market
potential benefits • providing opportunities in constrained environment • complementing government funding • being closer to employers needs • providing healthy stimulation through competition
healthy competition • Bolivia
healthy competition • Bolivia • Uruguay
healthy competition • Bolivia • Uruguay • Russia
healthy competition • Bolivia • Uruguay • Russia • Jordan and Lebanon
outline of the presentation... • the potential benefits of private higher education • the risks involved • the role of the State
the risks involved • inadequate quality • increasing inequalities • unfair competition
the quality challenge • diploma mills
the quality challenge • diploma mills • franchise institutions
the quality challenge • diploma mills • franchise institutions • quality assurance for virtual institutions and e-learning
the equity challenge • the higher the tuition fees, the more elitist the institution • eligibility for public resources? • scholarships • student loans
unequal competition • “free riding” the use of public professors
beware of foreign providers! • unequal competition • corporate behavior
for-profits targeting developing world • Apollo Group (Univ of Phoenix) -- Apollo International • Sylvan Learning Systems • Universidad Europea de Madrid • Universidad del Valle in Mexico • Unext.com? • Columbia, Chicago, Stanford, LSE, Carnegie Mellon
outline of the presentation... • the potential benefits of private higher education • the risks involved • the role of the State
the role of the State • mitigating the risks • promoting the harmonious growth of private institutions
main responsibility of the State • to put in place an enabling framework that encourages all higher institutions to be more innovative and responsive
role of the State • define a coherent national strategic vision and policy framework
role of the State • define a coherent national strategic vision and policy framework • establish an enabling regulatory environment