Power Point Prepared By. Ario Seno Nugroho (1B10 C6 ) Imam Budiman (1B10A8)

1. The Blurred Boundaries of Public Administration ByLloyd D. Musolf, University of CaiforniaHarold Seidma, University of Connecticut, Stors Power Point Prepared By. Ario Seno Nugroho (1B10C6) Imam Budiman (1B10A8)

2. Content • Introduction • Identifying Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Their Attributes • Is Private Legal Status Necessary? • Conclusion

3. Introduction • There is serious question about the appropriateness of quasi government/quasi private organization in democratic country • There is also blurring of the distinction between what is public and what is private posses : case on government sponsored enterprises

4. Identifying Government Sponsored Enterprises and Their Attributes • There is even considerable confusion about what to call the organization. • The “quasi private/quasi government” organization createdto fill the gap between what the private sector had been able to deliver and what the government felt was required in the public interest. • Chartered by the Federal Government and supervised by a government agency although they are privately owned (Appendixto the 1978 federal budget uses) • Accountability of public administration is need to be assured

5. Identifying Government Sponsored Enterprises and Their Attributes • The enterprises be excluded from the budget when they meet all of the following criteria : • The planned ownership of the enterprise is private • Its current ownership is more than 50 percent private • It is not subject to the budgetary control provisions of the Government Corporation Control Act • It is not otherwise subject to action on its budget by congress in the appropriation process • Unfortunately, for the clarity of public administration, these criteria fit the government-sponsored enterprises created since 1967 poorly • The greatest obstacle to conceptual clarity, however, is Congress tendency to describe many recent enterprises as private corporations

6. Is Private Legal Status Necessary • The supporters of hybrid organization mention independency from public authority is the answer to this question. • On the other side, the authors mention there are organization which have public status but more independence, such as Board of Governor of Federal Reserve. • They says privat status is a consequence of private involvement in government-sponsored organization.

7. Cont • When private more dominant in organization, How does public administrators maintain the acountability of the organization? • Another question is rising in financial accountability. The question is why private organizations have appropriate from government budget which is possible violate civil right law and others law and also how they spend their budget. • In addition, there is also inconsistency problems in borrowing procedures for hybrid organization.

8. Conclusion • The formation of hybrid organization rises accountability problems. • It seems the government tries to solve budget problem by creating organization which permits private sector to involve. • In contrary, this action create more problems because of lack of regulations.

9. Cont • The writers suggest to perform cost and benefit analysis before forming regulation to control this mixing organization. • they say the actually the problem is the public organization’s performance itself, if the government want to avoid more public and private mixing problems, the performance should improve and act in efficient manner.

10. Thank You