1 / 12

MODALS IN FINNIC

MODALS IN FINNIC. Petar Kehayov & Reeli Torn University of Tartu. The aims of the study. To examine the distribution of modal verbs in Finnic according to the type of modality To find out whether modal polyfunctionality is characteristic of all Finnic languages

hani
Download Presentation

MODALS IN FINNIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MODALS IN FINNIC Petar Kehayov & Reeli Torn University of Tartu

  2. The aims of the study • To examine the distribution of modal verbs in Finnic according to the type of modality • To find out whether modal polyfunctionality is characteristic of all Finnic languages • To present some evidence for particular patterns of grammaticalization

  3. Modality types (van der Auwera and Plungian 1998: 82)

  4. Finnish • Karelian • Veps • Ingrian • Votic • Estonian • Livonian

  5. Data sources • grammars and other language descriptions • linguistic studies focusing on a particular aspect of the modal system of a particular language • dictionaries • texts published in these languages • informants

  6. Final selection criteria • the verb must have modal reflexes at least in six languages • the modal meaning must be distinguishable from the premodal meaning • the verb must express at least two types of modality

  7. The selected verbs and their premodal meanings

  8. The distribution of the modal verb according to the modal meaning – participant-internal possibility;  – participant external non-deontic possibility; – deontic possibility; – epistemic possibility ■ – participant-internal necessity; ■ – participant external non-deontic necessity; ■ – deontic necessity; ■ – epistemic necessity

  9. The semantic map of the modal ‘get’

  10. The interaction between modal verbs and negation • ▼is used in ’◊ v’ • ▼ is used in ’□ v’ • ▼ is used in ’□ v’ and ’◊ v’ (= ’□ v’)

  11. Evidence for grammaticalization • Modal polyfunctionality • Human/animacy constraints on the agentive phrase • Disambiguating constraints on TAM • Polarity • Verbs that do not determine argument structure are taken to be more grammaticalized • Morphological irregularity

  12. Concluding remarks • All Finnic languages exhibit modal polyfunctionality, in the domain of possibility as well as necessity. • The modal ‘get’ is the most polyfunctional modal verb. • The degree of grammaticalization is reflected in semantic and morpho-syntactic respects.

More Related