200 likes | 361 Views
IFAD Strategy for Rural Poverty Reduction in the Near East and North Africa (NENA) PN Division Project Management Department February 2002. The strategy formulation process. Internal IFAD workshops & management meetings. Regional poverty assessment. IFAD Strategic Framework 2002-2006.
E N D
IFAD Strategy for Rural Poverty Reductionin the Near East andNorth Africa (NENA)PNDivisionProject Management DepartmentFebruary 2002
The strategy formulation process Internal IFAD workshops & management meetings Regional poverty assessment IFAD Strategic Framework 2002-2006 Draft Regional Strategy Paper IFAD Governing Council February 2002 NENA strategy regional workshop Beirut, May 2002 Final Regional Strategy Paper
Strategy outline • Introduction • NENA regional overview • Rural poverty in NENA • IFAD experience in NENA • IFAD strategy for poverty reduction
The NENA countries • Borrowing and non-borrowing: • 13 countries: Algeria, Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, West Bank & Gaza, Yemen. • Non-borrowing: • 7 countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE
Characteristics of the NENA region • Main economy • Wide range in GNP per capita • Mixed economic performance • Evidence of growing inequalities • The agricultural sector • Agricultural value-added: 16% of GDP • 36% of economically active pop. engaged in agriculture • Growing dependency on food imports
Characteristics of the NENA region • Main population characteristics • High growth of pop. & labor force • High dependency ratio
Livelihoods Small-scale farmers Nomads & pastoralists Artisanal fishermen Wage laborers Personal characteristics Displaced people Women-headed households Rural unemployed youth Who are the rural poor?
What constraints do the rural poor encounter? • Water • Land • Human assets • Technology • Financial services • Institutions • Political environment
IFAD portfolio in the NENA region • Since 1979 • 83 projects in 13 countries: agricultural development (40%); rural development (20%); credit & finance (10%); irrigation (9%); livestock (9%); fisheries (6%); research (5%) • IFAD investment USD 980 million • Total co-financing USD 1 260 million • 14 large TAGs (> USD 100 000 each)
IFAD experience in the NENA region • Achievements • Promotion of participatory approach and decentralization • Projects used as models for national programs • Adaptation of services to women’s needs • Support to research programmes
IFAD experience in the NENA region • Constraints faced • Project design complexity & rigidity • Non-sustainability of project outputs • Weak local institutions • Problems with counterpart funding • Limited beneficiary participation • Limited experience in addressing gender issues • Slow progress in policy change
Lessons from experience • Project design • Simplicity & flexibility • Programs rather than projects • Involving community organizations • Project implementation • More involvement of IFAD staff • Involving the private sector • Involving community organizations • Link grants w/ project implementation
IFAD strategic objectives in the NENA region • Empowerment of the rural poor • Income diversification for the rural poor • Equitable access to resources for women and men • Natural resource management (water, watersheds, rangelands)
Areas of intervention • Community development for management of common resources • Promoting appropriate technologies • On-farm long-term investment • Rural infrastructure • Rural financial institutions • Micro-enterprise development
Modalities of implementation • Program approach instead of projects • Targeting the poorest groups • Participatory approach • Capacity building of local institutions • Devolution to end-users & private sector • Integrating women in development • Supporting research & capacity building programs through TAGs
Action plan pillars • Policy dialogue: Catalytic role of IFAD in several policy areas (land tenure, development of community organizations, women in development, etc.) • Strategic partnerships: working with govts, donors, research inst’n, NGOs, etc. Knowledge management: cross-fertilization, workshops & seminars, dissemination of project findings • Impact management: beneficiary evaluation, qualitative & quantitative surveys, etc.