280 likes | 409 Views
Ethical Challenges in the Age of the Internet and Other Developments in Criminal Law. P R E S E N T A T I O N B Y:. Barry Nelson Covert, Esq.
E N D
Ethical Challenges in the Age of the Internet and Other Developments in Criminal Law P R E S E N T A T I O N B Y: Barry Nelson Covert, Esq. 4 2 D E L A W A R E A V E N U E | S U I T E 1 2 0 | B U F F A L O , N E W Y O R K 1 4 2 0 2 | 7 1 6 8 4 9 1 3 3 3 | B C O V E R T @ L G L A W . C O M
Ineffective Assistance “Open Your Wallet” Dombrowski v. Bulson (4th Dept. 2010; Ct. App. argument April 2012) • Jury trial convict.; 440 denied; writ. granted after 3 years for invest. and cross of def’s daughter • 4th Dept. found “Loss of Liberty” cause of action • Emotional Injuries and other losses Page 1
Ineffective Assistance D’Alessandro v. Carro (Supreme Court N.Y. County 2-29-12) • 1991 Kidnapping conviction (sent. 15 yrs) • 1995 Crim. Appeal – 30.30 not raised; Corum Nobis granted - “clearly meritorious” • $26M lawsuit. Plaintiff must est. - “Innocence” or “Colorable Claim of Innocence” Page 2
Plea Bargaining Law New field of Constitutionalized criminal procedure – “PLEA-BARGAINING LAW” Missouri v Frye • 4th revoked license offense (4 year sent. potential) • 90 day plea offer was never conveyed • Rearrested: 3 year sentence Page 3-6
Plea Negotiations – “Critical Stage” • 97% Federal, 94% State charges resolved by plea. “Course of legal representation” • Plea negotiations are “critical stage” • “Horse trading” is the criminal system • Duty to communicate plea offer • “Reasonable probability” def would have accepted and Pros. and Ct. allowed
Laffler v. Cooper “Shoot her in the butt!” - Defense • Def. shot at her head, missed. Then chased and shot her in buttocks, legs, etc. • Pros. offered 51-85 months • Def’d admitted guilt and wanted plea • Atty. loves “Shoot her in the butt” defense
Convicted after trial: 185-360 month sentence • “Criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.” • Remedy should be “tailored” to the injury and “neutralize the taint”. • May reduce sentence, convictions and/or both
Test But for ineffective advice there was a “reasonable probability” plea would have been accepted and conviction and/or sentence would have been lower.
Remedies Tailored to injury; “neutralize the taint.” Reduce (1) sentence; (2) conviction; (3) both
Matter of Steven G. P.I. client reenacted accident. Attorney thought that he should participate and assisted with her breast and assisted her hand (to find his pants). Nine month suspension. BUT…
Serving on “Committee on Character and Fitness” Continued to serve from date of crime (March ’07) through filing of criminal charges (June ’07), right up to his discon. plea (September ’08). Referee sought - Censure; Hearing Panel sought - 3 months.; 1st Dept. determined - 9 months.
The Menu • 2 years for sexual relations with a client • 6 months for unwanted sexual advances • Censure for sexual advances after dinner and drinks with job applicant • Censure for pinching secretary’s buttocks Page 6
Supervise Your Escrow Accounts In Re Galasso (2/12/12) • Respondent’s 15 bookkeeper and office manager was his bro; suddenly turned megalomaniacal. • Took in escrow monies of $6.8M, $800K + $175K • Bro. charged criminally – pled – 2.5 to 7.5 yr sentence • Resp. suspended 2 years – very critical and negative decision. • Bro. concealed through forged signatures and diverted bank statements Page 8
You Must Cooperate WithThe Grievance Committee New Second Circuit Rule: • Failure to cooperate with orders to show cause can constitute waiver of objections
File Your Tax Returnsand Pay Your Taxes • NYS AG’s office is specifically targeting attorneys. • Public Censure is the standard result - unless there are additional aggravating circumstances. Page 11
Trial Attorneys Still Enjoy A Nice Snooze! Muniz v. Smith (6th 2011) • Assault with intent to commit murder • Sentenced to 29 ½ - 60 years • Counsel fell asleep during defendant’s cross • 9th, 5th, and 2nd Circuit agree “presumed prejudice” only occurs when counsel “sleeps through substantial portion of the trial.” Page 12
Trial Attorneys Still Enjoy A Nice Snooze! • Juror affidavit that lawyer asleep during defendant’s testimony • Lawyer also arrested for possession of cocaine 3 weeks prior to trial • 6th Cir. noted that counsels objections at END of the cross supported a finding that he was “effective”. • Evidentiary hearing DENIED!
“We find that the respondent failed to maintain appropriate vigilance over his firms bank accounts, resulting in actual and substantial harm to client.” 2 YEAR SUSPENSION!
Beware The Digital Age – AKA “Know Your Technology” • Secure your wi-fi routers or any other means of access to your firm’s hard drives. • Do not assume that your device (1) does not have wi-fi capabilities or (2) that wi-fi needs to be manually turned on. • Always password protect! Page 32
Continuing Meta-Data Concerns • Opposing counsel usually may check the meta-data with impunity. • Check for embarrassing comments! • Fourth Department held FOIA petition entitled to inspect meta-data. In Matter of Irwin (4th Department 2010) Page 13 and 16
E-Mail Nightmares • Client e-mails sent from their employers computers may not be privileged. Holmes v. Petrovich Dev. Com. LLC (3rd Cir. 2011) • Company had warned that they retain the right to monitor computers Page 16
Parnes v. Parnes(3rd Dept. 2011) • Matrimonial case. • Husband inadvertently left one page of an email he had sent to his lawyer on desk and wife “found” a note with husband’s e-mail and password. • Wife printed all attorney e-mails and gave to her attorney. • Court held all but the one page were privileged. Page 21
Beware The “Cloud” • Must take “reasonable care” to ensure confidentiality. N.Y. Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 1.6. • Again – “know your technology” Page 17
Enforceable obligations to preserve confidentiality and security • Agreement to notify the attorney if they receive any legal process • Employ “available technology” to guard against “foreseeable attempt” to infiltrate
Websites • Common information such as attorney’s history, experience, area and practice would constitute attorney advertising and must carry appropriate warnings. Page 26
Websites • Inviting web inquiries could invoke attorney-client relationship and could create future conflicts.
For Additional Information Barry Nelson Covert, Esq. Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP 42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 Buffalo, NY 14202 716 849 1333, ext. 365 bcovert@lglaw.com