1 / 39

Online Peer Assessment Platform - Enhancing Group Work Evaluation

Explore the strategic process of utilizing the Peer Assessment Platform (OPAS) for evaluating individual contributions or group work. Engage in module preparation, assignment uploads, peer assessment, and reviewing results efficiently. Students and module leaders can benefit from a streamlined evaluation experience.

hawkinsmichael
Download Presentation

Online Peer Assessment Platform - Enhancing Group Work Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Please note: the screenshots in this presentation reflect the ‘process’ of using OPAS. OPAS has been updated since this presentation was produced. Online Peer Assessment Prof Nathan Clarke & Dr Paul Dowland Centre for Security, Communications and Network Research School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics

  2. System Objectives • Peer assessment website is designed to operate in one of two ways: • The peer assessment/review of individual contributions to group work OR • The peer assessment of group work www.fotpms.plymouth.ac.uk/OPAS/

  3. Initial Staff User Screen

  4. Module Management Screen

  5. Assessment Modes 1 Module Preparation 2 Assignment Upload 3 Preparing Peer Assessment 4 Peer Assessment & Submitting of Marks 5 Module Leader Reviewing Results 6 Display Results to Students

  6. Module Preparation

  7. Module Preparation

  8. Module Preparation – Student Prompts

  9. Module Preparation - Assessment Criteria

  10. Module Preparation – Adding Students

  11. Module Preparation – Adding Students

  12. Module Preparation – Student Groups

  13. Module Preparation – Student Groups

  14. Module Preparation – Student Groups In addition to creating groups, you can also add individuals to existing groups • Changes in group structure • New students/group additions

  15. Module Preparation – Student Groups

  16. Student View

  17. Student View – Mode 1

  18. Student View – Mode 1

  19. Student View – Mode 4

  20. Student View – Mode 4

  21. Student View – Mode 4

  22. Student View – Mode 4

  23. Student View – Mode 4

  24. Student View – Mode 4

  25. Student Assessment Review

  26. Module Leader Reviewing Results

  27. Module Leader Reviewing Results

  28. Module Leader Reviewing Results

  29. Module Leader Calculating Results

  30. Module Leader Calculating Results

  31. Module Leader Calculating Results

  32. Module Leader Reviewing Results • Once all the results have been processed, you have the opportunity to modify results: • Scale/Modify the entire cohort of students • Modify individual students

  33. Module Leader Reviewing Results Modifying the entire cohort of students

  34. Module Leader Reviewing Results Modifying an individual student

  35. Student View – Mode 6

  36. Positive Student Comments • “It was a positive experience because one of the reports I read and marked was of very high quality. It helped to reiterate what was required in carrying out the assignment and helped to increase my knowledge of the subject.” • “Gave me a chance to see how other people have interpreted the task in hand.” • “It was very useful for revision purposes and also gave me an idea how my mates approached and tackled the task.” • “I now understand the marking procedure behind the reports and the sort of scrutiny they are subject to.”

  37. Negative Student Comments • Did not like deciding someone’s final mark • Marks are awarded by subjective students and not a professional • Marking sheet/criteria was not explained enough • Increased the amount of work that had to be done for this assignment

  38. Interested? Contact the developers: Dr Paul Dowland / Prof Nathan Clarke pdowland@plymouth.ac.uk nclarke@plymouth.ac.uk

  39. Any Questions? Centre for Security, Communications and Network Research School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics Plymouth University www.cscan.org

More Related