360 likes | 372 Views
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Actual vs. Modeled Operation of Combined-Cycle Combustion Turbines in the Pacific Northwest. Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, OR August 21, 2008.
E N D
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power PlanActual vs. Modeled Operation of Combined-Cycle Combustion Turbines in the Pacific Northwest Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, OR August 21, 2008
Excessive Shutdown Disorder: condition where modeled operation of CCCTs exhibit more stops (and starts) than actual operation. July 17, 2008
Q: How do you know if you have excessive shutdown disorder? A: Get EPA’s Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) data. July 17, 2008
Pacific Northwest CCCT Dataset • EPA CEMS Data: 2006 – Q1 2008 • Hourly Operating Data: 19,704 hours • Generating Unit Data: • Aggregate to plant level • Gross Generation (in MW) • For gas turbines only (not for HRSGs) • Fuel Input (in MMBtu) • Fuel Factor (i.e., Hourly Fuel Input / Max(Fuel Input)) as proxy for CCCT capacity factor July 17, 2008
Northwest CCCTs in CEMS Database July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Actual Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Modeled Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Actual Week Summer July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Modeled Week Summer July 17, 2008
Hermiston Power: Actual Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
Hermiston Power: Modeled Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
Klamath Cogen: Actual Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
Klamath Cogen: Modeled Operation in 2007 July 17, 2008
More modeled starts per year… July 17, 2008
Much shorter modeled runtimes… July 17, 2008
Q: Why is excessive shutdown an important problem? A: Because it impacts: • wholesale power market price forecasts; and • power system carbon dioxide forecasts July 17, 2008
AURORA CCCT Commitment and Dispatch Parameters July 17, 2008
MIN UP Estimation July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Actual Up Time HistogramN = 30 July 17, 2008
Chehalis: Actual Up Time HistogramN = 78 July 17, 2008
PNW CCCTs: Actual Up Time HistogramN = 1,114 July 17, 2008
PNW CCCTs: Actual Up Time HistogramN = 759 Min Up = 17 hours July 17, 2008
MIN Down Estimation July 17, 2008
PNW CCCTs: Actual Down Time HistogramN = 1,113 July 17, 2008
PNW CCCTs: Actual Down Time HistogramN = 749 Min Down = 3 hours July 17, 2008
MIN Capacity Estimation July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Cumulative Frequency of Operating Level (N = 14,180 hours) July 17, 2008
Big Hanaford: Cumulative Frequency of Operating Level (N = 4,964) July 17, 2008
Chehalis: Cumulative Frequency of Operating Level (N = 9,601 hours) July 17, 2008
PNW CCCTs: Cumulative Frequency of Operating Level Curves July 17, 2008
Ramp Rate Estimation July 17, 2008
Coyote Springs 1: Ramp Rate Illustration July 17, 2008
Minimum Number of Hours to Heat Input Factor > = .85 July 17, 2008
Minimum Number of Hours to Heat Input Factor > = .90 July 17, 2008
Minimum Number of Hours to Heat Input Factor > = .95 July 17, 2008
Next Steps: • Firm-up existing unit and new technology operating parameters • Estimate Start-up and Shut-down costs • Use AURORA’s new “shutdown penalty” to adjust modeled CCCT operation July 17, 2008