1 / 17

Multi-Party Politics

Multi-Party Politics. Barriers to Third Parties in US: See Duverger’s Law (last week) Assembly Size (US Congress tiny) Ballot Access Laws Rules governing territory on Nov. ballot USSC: states have ‘legitimate interest in state laws protecting two party system’. Assembly Size.

hazina
Download Presentation

Multi-Party Politics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multi-Party Politics • Barriers to Third Parties in US: • See Duverger’s Law (last week) • Assembly Size (US Congress tiny) • Ballot Access Laws • Rules governing territory on Nov. ballot • USSC: states have ‘legitimate interest in state laws protecting two party system’

  2. Assembly Size

  3. Assembly Size US = 700K per district...Mexico 200K, France 100K, UK 100K More districts = fewer voters per district Fewer voters per district = more homogenous If minor party supporters geographically concentrated

  4. Multi-party politics in US • Ballot Access Laws • Set by State legislators • Catch 22 • Minor party must post X% in statewide race to have access for their candidate in next election • 1% some places,

  5. Ballot Access Rules & # of Minor Parties/Candidates AK ID MT OR WA US Senate 5 1 4 5 4 Governor 6 3 4 3 3 Number 2004 6 5a 4 5b 3 Vote share to qualify for official / major status 3% 3% <5%* 5%^ 5% Petition for new 1% 2% <5% 1.5% 100 voters party candidates at convention

  6. Ballot Access • US Presidential Elections • If no existing access, petition • Minor party vs. ‘independent’ • Varies greatly by state • 1000 signatures - 10% of votes cast in last election • CA = 158,000 sigs; NC 60,000; GA 50,000

  7. Ballot Access • How get on for 2012 • Start NOW (if allowed); w/ 2010 race • Use ballot slots of existing parties • Run in different states under different party names (Constitution Party, Taxpayer Party, Libertarian Party) • Run in some states as independent, some as under party line

  8. Ballot Access • US 2008....President • Nader (46 states) Nader 0.5% • Libertarians (45 states) Bob Barr 0.4% • Constitution (37 states) Baldwin 0.15% • Greens (32 states) McKinney 0.12% • Socialism & Liberation (12 States) • Socialist Workers (10 states) • Socialist (8 States) • AIP (3 states) Alan Keyes 0.04% • TOTAL 2008 1.5%

  9. Support for Multi-party politics • In United States • keep 2 party system 38% • no parties 28% • more parties 34%

  10. Support for Multi Party Politics • Support PR for US Congress? • US 44% yes, 49% no • WA 56% yes, 40% no • Who? • independents who ‘lean’ D or R • not strong liberal Ds • not strong liberal Rs • Men • people who distrust government

  11. Did Nader Elect Bush • 2000 US Presidential election • Gore won natl pop. vote by 500,000 • Lost FL by 500 votes, lost electoral college (271-266-1) • Nader 90,000 votes in FL • Vote stealing vs. mobilization

  12. Did Nader Elect Bush • Can we assume that minor party voters would have supported either major party candidate? • Can we assume minor party voters would have voted?

  13. Did Nader Elect Bush? • In a two-way race (2000 polls) • Of Nader voters, if just 2, who?: • Gore 47.7% • Bush 21.9% • Abstain 30.5% • 42% of Buchanan voters would have abstained

  14. Did Nader Elect Bush • did Nader elect Bush in 2000? = • did Wallace elect Nixon 1968? • did Anderson elect Carter 1980? • did Perot elect Clinton 1992? • did Perot elect Clinton in 1996? • 2008....vote stealing vs. mobilization?

  15. Multi-Party Politics in US • Minor candidates ‘crowd’ Presidential ballots • 2008 1.5% • 2004 1.0% • 2000 3.8% • 1996 10.0% • 1992 19.5% • 1988 1.0% • 1984 0.7% • 1980 8.2%

  16. Multi-party politics in US • Minor parties as ‘spoilers?’ • What to do?

  17. Prospects for a “third” party • For multi-party politics in US • Dim, but... • regional divisions emerge • major party splits • Institutional change • at state or local level? • via ballot measures?

More Related