1 / 45

Military Aspects of PfP

Military Aspects of PfP. Lt.Col. Endre Szénási , M oD Defence Policy and NATO Department. Objectives of PfP. facilitation of transparency in national defence planning and budgeting processes; ensuring democratic control of defence forces;

hcheryl
Download Presentation

Military Aspects of PfP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Military Aspects of PfP Lt.Col.Endre Szénási, MoD Defence Policy and NATO Department

  2. Objectivesof PfP • facilitation of transparency in national defence planning and budgeting processes; • ensuring democratic control of defence forces; • maintenance of the capability and readiness to con- tribute, subject to constitutional considerations, to operations under the authority of the UN and/or the responsibility of the OSCE;

  3. Objectivesof PfP • the development of cooperative military relations with NATO, for the purpose of joint planning, training, and exercises in order to strengthen their ability to undertake missions in the fields of peacekeeping, search and rescue, humanitarian operations, and others as may subsequently be agreed;

  4. Objectivesof PfP • the development, over the longer term, of forces that are better able to operate with those of the members of the North Atlantic Alliance.

  5. From PfP to NATO • 08 Feb 1994, announcement of HU accession to PfP; • 06 Jun 1994, PfP Presentation Document; • 15 Nov 1994, approval of HU IPP by NATO; • 15 Dec 1994 HU Parliament ratifies the PfP Framework Document • 29 Jan 1996, official HU declaration to join NATO.

  6. Co-operation Forces and capabilities offered for co-operation Individual Partnership Programme (IPP) Partnership Work Programme (PWP)

  7. Areas of CooperationPWP 1.) Air Defence Related Matters (ADF) 2.) Airspace Management/Control (ASM) 3.) Consultation, Command and Control, including Consultation, Command and Control, Including Communications and Information Systems, Navigation and Identification Systems, Interoperability Aspects, Procedures and Terminology (C3) 4.) Civil Emergency Planning (CEP) 5.) Crisis Management (CRM)

  8. Areas of CooperationPWP 6.) Democratic Control of Forces and Defence Structures (DCF) 7.) Defence Planning, Budgeting and Resource Management (DPB) 8.) Planning, Organization and Management of National Defence Procurement Programmes and International Cooperation in the Armaments Field (DPM) 9.) Defence Policy and Strategy (DPS) 10.) Planning, Organization and Management of National Defence Research and Technology (DRT)

  9. Areas of CooperationPWP 11.) Military Geography (GEO) 12.) Language Training (LNG) 13.) Consumer Logistics (LOG) 14.) Medical Services (MED) 15.) Meteorological Support for NATO/Partner Forces 16.) Military Infrastructure (MIF)

  10. Areas of CooperationPWP 17.) Political and Defence Efforts Against NBC Proliferation (NBC) 18.) Conceptual, Planning and Operational Aspects ofPeacekeeping (PKG) 19.) Operational, Materiel and Administrative Aspects of Standardization (STD) 20.) Military Exercises and Related Training Activities (TEX) 21.) Military Education, Training and Doctrine (TRD)

  11. Enhanced and More Operational Partnership (EMOP) • PMF - Political- Military Framework; • DRC - Defence Related and Military Cooperation; • PARP - Planning and Review Process; • TEEP - Training and Education Enhancement Programme; • OCC - Operational Capabilities Programme.

  12. PfP for Hungary • Co-operation with the European Security Organisations: NATO, WEU, OSCE; • Political and military co-operation with partner countries; • Preparation for NATO membership; • Adaptation of NATO procedures.

  13. The main areas of co-operation in the beginning • widening of possibilities in co-operation; • development of the requirements of civil control of the armed forces; • development of defence planning methodology; • regional language training;

  14. The main areas of co-operation in the beginning • procedural harmonisation; • adaptation of NATO standards and publications, • interoperability and compatibility, • fulfilment of PARP goals.

  15. Our difficulties in PfP • language problem; • legal harmonisation; • no harmony in planning process ; • real undertakings; • follow up of trained personnel.

  16. The Hungarian Defense Budget (1990-2002)

  17. The Hungarian PfP Budget in 1999

  18. ACTIVITIES FINANCED FROM A HUNGARIAN NATO-BUDGET (‘99) • a lot of activities have been shifted from PfP to NATO framework • we only deal with activities remaining in PfP framework

  19. ACTIVITIES FINANCED FROM A HUNGARIAN PfP-BUDGET • PfP Activities Abroad (Planned + Reserve) • PfP Activities in Hungary • Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP, Planned + Reserve) • EAPC Action Plan • DPQ related activities (Reserve) • General Reserve Budget • MoFA + MoI

  20. The Hungarian PfP budget in 1999 (x1000 USD): MoD ACTIVITY Budget PfP Activities Abroad (Planned) 194.3 PfP Activities Abroad (Reserve) 113.6 Activities in Hungary 219.1 Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / planned 4.5 Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / reserve 0 EAPC Action Plan 45.5 DPQ related activities (reserve) 45.5 General Reserve Budget 63.1 MoD grand total 646.8

  21. The 1999 PfP budget (x1000 USD): MoD

  22. The Hungarian PfP budget ing 1999 (x1000 USD): HDF • ACTIVITY Budget • PfP Activities Abroad (Planned) 225.7 • PfP Activities Abroad (Reserve) 136.4 • Activities in Hungary 88.3 • Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / planned 584.5 • Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / reserve 90.2 • EAPC Action Plan 0 • DPQ related activities (reserve) 227.3 • General Reserve Budget 0 • MDF grand total 1353.2

  23. The 1999 PfP budget (x1000 USD): HDF

  24. Hungarian PfP budget in 1999 (x1000 USD): MoD+HDF ACTIVITY Budget Total: PfP Activities Abroad (Planned) 381.4 PfP Activities Abroad (Reserve) 250 Activities in Hungary 307.4 Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / planned 589.1 Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / reserve 90.9 EAPC Action Plan 45.5 DPQ related activities (reserve) 272.2 General Reserve Budget 63.1 MoD grand total 2 000

  25. The 1999 PfP budget (x1000 USD): MoD + HDF

  26. The Hungarian PfP budget in 1999 (x1000 USD) • ACTIVITY Budget • MoDHDFTotal: • PfP Activities Abroad (Planned) 194.3 225.7 381.4 • PfP Activities Abroad (Reserve) 113.6 136.4 250 • Activities in Hungary 219.1 88.3 307.4 • Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / planned 4.5 584.5 589.1 • Exercises (PfP + in the spirit of PfP) / reserve 0 90.2 90.9 • EAPC Action Plan 45.5 0 45.5 • DPQ related activities (reserve) 45.5 227.3 272.2 • General Reserve Budget 63.1 0 63.1 • MoD grand total 646.8 1353.22 000 • MoFA45.5 • MoI 86.4

  27. Summary of the Hungarian PfP budget ing 1999 (x1000 USD)

  28. The 1999 PfP budget (x1000 USD):MoD, MoFA, MoI MoD + HDF 2 000 MoFA45.5 MoI 86.4

  29. The 1999 PfP budget (x1000 USD):MoD, MoFA, MoI

  30. The Hungarian PfP budget 1998-1999 comparison

  31. The Hungarian PfP budget: 1998-1999 comparison

  32. Analysis of the Hungarian PfP budget: 1998-1999 comparison • The comparison is to be analysed in junction with the NATO Plan (NATO Budget), because a lot of activities are shifted from PfP to NATO budget. • The overall PfP budget has decreased approximately by one third of it’s volume in 1998.

  33. The Hungarian role in PfP as a NATO member BIRTH OF NEW REQUIREMENTS AS A RESULT OF OUR CHANGED STATUS

  34. BIRTH OF NEW REQUIREMENTS AS A RESULT OF OUR CHANGED STATUS • 1994-98 period - PfP membership (preparation for our NATO membership) • 1999 - NATO membership (preparation of other PfP countries for a higher level of NATO interoperability)

  35. Major aspects of the Hungarian PfP participation as a NATO member: • Integration into NATO • Tool of Consultation and Co-operation with PfP Partner Nations • The Donor Role • Participation in Multinational Formations (PfP Deployable Forces) in NATO Led Peace Support (and other crisis management) Operations • Bilateral activities

  36. Integration into NATO • Preparation replaced by integration • Still need to learn • Primary channel is NATO

  37. PfP, as a tool of consultation and co-operation • As important, as before NATO membership • Our responsibilities will even grow • Equally our and the Partner Nations interest • We need to achieve the highest possible level of consultation and co-operation

  38. The donor role of Hungary in NATO interoperability • Increasingly significant • We need to become providers, rather then consumers • More emphasis will need to be put on the preparation of other PfP Partner Nations • Higher level of financial support to partner nations

  39. The Hungarian standpoint regarding some of the major aspects of PfP • Partnership for Peace is primarily a political rather then a military framework(the overestimation of the military component of PfP is wrong) • We need to avoid offers from Partner Nations with no real substance behind them as well as quantitative approach • NATO should take into consideration the suggestions and comments coming from the PfP Partner Nations regarding their participation in PfP

  40. The PfP planning process (simplified) HU Parliament NATO Coordinating Body HU Government Interministerial Coordination Committee NATO Dept. (MoD Coord. Body) HU Executing Organisations NATO Executing Organisations

  41. PfP transition after Prague A new, more substantive relationship with Partners, which intensifies cooperation in responding to new security challenges, including terrorism.

  42. PfP transition after Prague Innovations and adaptations • Enhancing Political and Security-Related Consultations • Reflecting Broader Approach to Security in EAPC and PfP • Individualised Comprehensive Cooperation and Action Strategy • A More Cohesive and Result-Oriented Partnership: the Partnership Action Plan Mechanism

  43. PfP transition after Prague Innovations and adaptations • Increasing the Contribution of Partnership to Security and Stability at Sub-Regional Level • Increasing the Association of Partners with NATO Decision Making Process in Specific Areas • Improving Liaison Arrangements between NATO and Partner Capitals • Promoting Closer Routine Working Relationships between Military Structures

  44. PfP transition after Prague Innovations and adaptations • Offering Increased Opportunities for Civilian Partner Personnel in NATO Structures • Improving Funding Arrangements • Improving the Organisation and Management of Partnership Work

  45. Questions?

More Related