1 / 29

TRI  P use of AGOR + new request

TRI  P use of AGOR + new request. The program of last year Optimizing yield for secondary beams Results for new secondary beams Program for next year(+) Summary of this specific request (P5) summary of separate requests (P5, P6, P7, LoI-1). Status request from last year (P4). .

heidi-dixon
Download Presentation

TRI  P use of AGOR + new request

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TRIP use of AGOR + new request • The program of last year • Optimizing yield for secondary beams • Results for new secondary beams • Program for next year(+) • Summary of this specific request (P5) • summary of separate requests (P5, P6, P7, LoI-1)

  2. Status request from last year (P4)

  3.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction product projectile neutron p

  4.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  5.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  6.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  7.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  8.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  9.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  10.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  11.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  12.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  13.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction p

  14.  Kinematics of inverse (p,n) reaction Kinematics:  = p = 2/Ap (Q=0) independent of energy p • Optimizing acceptance • high energy solution: forward angles • low energy solution: Q mismatch TRIP separator:  = 60 mrad p = 4%

  15.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: direct reactions p d/d For L=0 and high energy limit:

  16.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: direct reactions p d/d

  17.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: direct reactions p d/d 21Ne 21Na @ 43 MeV/nucleon No momentum acceptance limit observed 3 kHz/pnA

  18.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: Q-value p

  19.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: Q-value p

  20.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: Q-value p

  21.  Inverse (p,n) reaction: Q-value p Well suited for many products

  22. The case 19F(p,n)19Ne For P2 10 kHz/pnA Fusion-evaporation Direct reaction

  23. The case 12C(p,n)12N For P7: Customer satisfied

  24. Production and decay of20Na 20Na is an excellent diagnostic tool: ,  and  source 20Na 2moc2  spectrum from implanted 20Na 2.9% 10.3 0.25% 9.48 + 16% 7.42 4.73 16O +  79% (p,n) 1 kHz/pnA 1.63  0 E (MeV) 20Ne

  25. Inverse (p,n) reaction: differential stopping l p Thickness of target limited by difference in stopping of projectile and product. (Windows do not contribute)

  26. New request ! P4 finished and does not include the other request !  30 days

  27. Total request TRIP separator (not only for this year!)  63 days

  28. Inverse (p,n) reaction: differential stopping x p

  29. Inverse (p,n) reaction: differential stopping x p

More Related