1 / 25

Working Together for Solutions

Working Together for Solutions. How to react on challenges facing the pork industry today ? The advantages of HiPro soymeal for pork feeding Zsarnóczay Sándor, Pig-DATA Kft. – Danisco Animal Nutrition. AGP – Agricultural Conference 21-23 June 2009 Harkány.

helga
Download Presentation

Working Together for Solutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Together for Solutions How to react on challenges facing the pork industry today? The advantages of HiPro soymeal for pork feeding Zsarnóczay Sándor, Pig-DATA Kft. – Danisco Animal Nutrition AGP – Agricultural Conference 21-23 June 2009 Harkány

  2. TheHiPro soymeal’s advantages in practice

  3. The base for HiPro soymeal’s purchasing Price Processing (extraction) Nutrients Production Results

  4. Why the HiPro soymeal? • High Extraction Standard • High raw protein (min. 47,5 %) and lysine (min. 2,98 %) rate • Low fibre content (max. 3,3%) • High energy rate - (A)ME poultry: 2525 kcal/kg or 10.55 MJ/kg - ME pork: 3385 kcal/kg or 14.15 MJ/kg • Optimized production technology - Ureas activity 0.01-0.2 pH growth - Protein solvability in 0,2% KOHsolution: 73–87% - PDI

  5. Regulations for Soymeal from the USA’sNational Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA) HiProII. Diff. Raw Protein, % 47,5 - 49 44-46 4 Raw Fat, % min. 0.5 0.5 0 Raw Fibre, % max. 3,3-3,5 7,0 3,5 Moisture Content, % max. 12,0 12,0 0

  6. Raw Protein quantity in % in the 26357 HiPro sample (analytic trial) Average: 47,49 % , 1 SD 0,81

  7. Comparison of Amino acid content of some Oilseed meals 44% soymeal HiPro soymeal Cottonseed meal Peanut meal Rapeseed meal Sunflower meal Canola Arginin 3.4 3.8 4.6 2.3 4.6 2 3.5 Lysine 2.9 3.2 1.7 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.7 Methionine 0.65 0.75 0.52 0.7 0.42 1.5 1.5 Cystin 0.67 0.74 0.64 0.47 0.73 0.7 0.7 Tryptophan 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 Hystidin 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1 1 1 Leucine 3.4 3.8 2.4 2.6 3.7 2.6 2.6 Isoleucine 2.5 2.6 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.1 Phenylalanine 2.2 2.7 2.2 1.5 2 2.2 2.2 Threonine 1.7 2 1.3 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.5 Valin 2.4 2.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3

  8. Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances Protein and Amino acid Digestibility Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment optimal temperature interval

  9. Quality Assurance: Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances Protein and Amino acid Digestibility Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment optimal temperature interval Time: 25 - -- 20------------------ 5 2 -------- 1 Ureáz: .3 .02 - - - - - 0 0,2 % KOH: 70 85 - - 90 PDI: - - - 30 15 - -

  10. The right extraction’s nutrition-preservative role Inefficient - Anti-nutritive factors Heat Treatment tripsyn inhibitors lectins lipoxygen (Ureáz test) Excessive- Proteins denature Heat Treatment Lysine ruins (KOH test for protein solvability)

  11. Summary: • There is a wide variety of soya products available for the forage industry. • The characters of the soya are largely dependent on the country of origin and the used heat treatment technology. • The protein and amino acid digestibility and the concentration of anti-nutritive substances can be optimized with the right heat treatment. • With help of quality control procedures the heat treatment’s rateand the variability of nutritive substances can be established. • It is practical to use one of the presented tests in the factory, and the achieved results should be used for the recipe's composition. The base for the GMP (GoodManufacturingPractices) could be developedwith the help of these tests, too.

  12. Better quality Protein Carriers -even though their price per ton is higher- reward the ambitious and good thinking professional who does not only want to “produce” a broiler but also a profit.- Dr. Németh Boldizsár -

  13. Main Ingredients Parameters of HiPro and II. classsoymeal (%)

  14. Soymeal Energy levels

  15. How to count?

  16. Counting with real figures on base of ideal digestibility Figures of digestible lysine, threonine, methionineand tryptophan.

  17. Why is it more practical to calculate on base of digestibility? • Amino acids of different ingredients are utilized differently. • E.g. lysine of soymeal is 85-91% digestible… (meat powder only 70-75%!) • The “traditional” formula does not take thisinto account. • The traditionally formed forage’s expected efficiency is not good enough… • The comparison of ingredientson base of digestibilityis much more objective. Production and expenses of forage formed this way are more efficient…

  18. Real ideal digestibility of main amino-acids of HiPro, II.class soymeal, barley, wheatand corn (%)– monogastric livestock

  19. Pork and Broiler requirements – using the previous data, and recommended by the sourcesshown below: On base of ideal digestibility NRC, Degussa, INRA, AFZ, ITCF, ADISSEO, Ajinomoto, AmiPig és SwinePro

  20. 88% solid content ,on base of feeding with ready-made forage (DEGUSSA+AVENTIS,2001)

  21. What can we establish? • The HiPro soymeal is more efficient ingredient (even though it is more expensive), compared to the II. class soymeal. • By using the HiPro soymeal the recipe’s fibre content is lower, therefore it is more likely that better digestibility of the foragecould be guaranteed; and the raw protein does not limit either(!). • That means, that for production of 1 kg livestock forage expenses could be lower !

  22. What lesson to draw? • In each case in the recipesthe HiPro replaced the II. class soymeal, if we did not limit the raw protein. • The HiPro had a higher proportion in recipes even in the case of raw protein limitation. • In any case the HiPro is a more profitable digestible amino-acid source than the II. class soymeal.

  23. Summary: • Today every single penny(!) is important for breeders! • It was proved that –in most of the cases – usage of a more expensive ingredients could be more profitable than similar but cheaper ingredients! • The HiPro soymeal is not only more profitable, but it is a more digestible forage for animals, too!

  24. Thank You for Your Attention!

More Related