1 / 21

Creating Livable Communities:

Creating Livable Communities:. Preserving Affordability and Access in Areas Near Transit for All Ages and Incomes. Rodney Harrell, PhD Strategic Policy Senior Advisor AARP Public Policy Institute November 19, 2009. AARP. AARP is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization Subsidiaries:

helmut
Download Presentation

Creating Livable Communities:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Creating Livable Communities: Preserving Affordability and Access in Areas Near Transit for All Ages and Incomes Rodney Harrell, PhDStrategic Policy Senior AdvisorAARP Public Policy Institute November 19, 2009

  2. AARP • AARP is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization • Subsidiaries: • AARP Services Inc. – Products and services • AARP Foundation – Community service programs and legal advocacy, 501(c)(3) • National office, 53 state offices (50 States, DC, PR, & VI) • Volunteer Board of Directors • Founded in 1948 • 40+ million members

  3. Aging in Place “What I’d really like to do is remain in my home for as long as possible.” Source: AARP State of 50+ America Survey, October 2005 Age category: 50+ Base=910

  4. Aging in Place “What I’d really like to do is remain in my local community for as long as possible.” Source: AARP State of 50+ America Survey, October 2005 Age category: 50+ Base=910

  5. AARP and TOD • AARP’s Livable Communities Agenda works for the creation of safe communities that have affordable and appropriate housing, supportive community features and services and adequate mobility options. • Well-developed TOD also works to achieve these goals

  6. Boomers lead to growth in the 65+ population Source: U.S Census Bureau - Census projections as of 8/2008

  7. AARP Policy Book 2009-2010 • Livable Communities chapter (Chapter 9) created to integrate housing, transportation and land use. • Policy includes the encouragement of mixed used development within walking distance of transit, increasing density near transit stops and including affordable housing in areas near transit. www.aarp.org/policybook

  8. “Preserving Affordability and Access in Livable CommunitiesSubsidized Housing Opportunities near Transit and the 50 + Population” • AARP PPI, Reconnecting America, and the National Housing Trust developed a study that looked at the potential costs and benefits of different locations for older residents of subsidized housing. • Released Sept. 30, available at www.aarp.org/ppi under “Livable Communities.”

  9. Overview Subsidized housing near transit meets a crucial need for older adults. (Project-based Section 8 and Section 202) However, existing affordable housing near transit is increasingly at risk in the face of upward pressure on housing prices and expiring government subsidies. Preserving affordable housing near transit is of critical importance for creating livable communities for older Americans.

  10. Affordable housing near transit is at risk… Expiring government affordability requirements gives owners the option to exit the program and convert the property to a non affordable use. A determination that they can charge higher rents than the subsidy they receive from HUD is the most significant indication of whether an owner will opt of these housing programs. As demand for housing near transit increases, the rising cost of land threatens the continued availability of affordable homes near transit

  11. Metropolitan Areas Analyzed Atlanta New York City Baltimore Philadelphia Boston Phoenix Chicago Portland (Oregon) Cleveland St. Louis Denver Salt Lake City Houston San Francisco Los Angeles Seattle Miami Washington DC Minneapolis/St. Paul

  12. Interviews • Site visits and interviews with 50+ residents of affordable housing developments • 30 interviews in 5 metropolitan areas: Boston, Cleveland, LA, Miami, Twin Cities • Locations within ¼ mile of quality transit (near) and more than ½ mile of quality transit (far)

  13. Long waiting lists for housing Safety and perception of safety were issues Lack of access to train station limits the use by residents Good bus service on main avenues, problems getting elsewhere Cleveland, OH

  14. Twin Cities, MN • The downtown location in Minneapolis has access to light rail, buses, shopping • Buses in Edina not “frequent” but are useful • Car access not as important as in other areas due to effective, useful transit

  15. Notes from interviews: • Long waiting lists for housing • “Some places are easier to get to than others” • Personal loneliness and isolation in some locations • Isolation of housing has widespread costs

  16. Subsidized housing near transit

  17. Housing Types

  18. Summary of Research Findings A. Access to transit in compact development areas provides mobility and choice,but limitations can exist: • Nearby transit isn’t useful unless you can get to it; • Transit must accommodate people with varying physical limitations; and • Transit must take people where they need to go. B. In areas far from transit, losing mobility means losing independence Subsidized housing meets a crucial need for residents with few housing options, and the benefits of locations near transit are widely enjoyed only when transit is accessible, safe, and useful.

  19. Who Benefits the Most from Housing Near Transit? Minimal Benefit Full Benefit High Amount of Limitations Low Amount of Limitations Individual:Significant physical limitations that prevent boarding or waiting for transit. Those who do not understand the transit system. Individual:Open to the idea of transit, without cognitive or physical impairments, and able to read and understand signage Community (External): Living in poorly planned or economically struggling communities with little shopping or services nearby. Poor transit service, including bus drivers who won’t stop, poor route planning, unreliable service, inaccessible stops/stations, high crime levels. Community (External):Living in well-planned, safe, healthy communities and in walkable neighborhoods with resources nearby. Frequent, accessible, reliable transit service that connects to most other places that one would want to travel to.

  20. Policy Implications We argue for policies that will lead to: • The preservation of existing affordable housing, particularly in advantageous locations. • Greater integration of transportation and land use in policy, planning and implementation efforts • Improvements and greater investment in transit

  21. More Information: • AARP Public Policy Institute: www.aarp.org/ppi • AARP PPI Livable Communities Documents: http://www.aarp.org/research/ppi/liv-com/ • PPI Document Requests: ppi@aarp.org • Dr. Rodney Harrell: rharrell@aarp.org

More Related