1 / 30

Dr. Debbie Douma, Dean Office of Grants & Federal Programs

A practical guide to preparing and winning a new TRIO Grant Award, including points breakdown and essential steps for proposal development. Learn from expert Dr. Debbie Douma about maximizing your chances.

hermana
Download Presentation

Dr. Debbie Douma, Dean Office of Grants & Federal Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prior Experience Points,Who Needs Them?A Practical Guide to Winning a New TRIO Grant AwardFlorida Council for Resource DevelopmentSpring ConferenceMiami Dade CollegeApril 2018 Dr. Debbie Douma, Dean Office of Grants & Federal Programs

  2. Pensacola State College • Serves Escambia and Santa Rosa counties (total pop. 352,615) in the NW corner of the Florida Panhandle • One of 28 colleges in the Florida College System • Opened doors in 1948 as Florida’s first public 2-year college • ~10% of all persons in the two- county district 18 years or older attend the college

  3. PSC Grants & Federal Programs Staff • Jamie Russell Grants Coordinator • Lisa Alloway Documentation Technologist

  4. PSC’s newest TRIO programs: • Veterans Upward Bound • Veterans Student Support Services

  5. Veterans Upward Bound 2017 • Points Available (w/o PEP): 105 • Score to receive grant in initial announcement: ≥105.67 • The funding band: 105.33 – 104.67 • PSC Score (w/o PEP): 105 • Unofficial List: 14 NEW VUB projects funded

  6. Getting Started – The Basics • Read the RFP • Read the RFP, again • Set up a working document template • Preferably, work in a collaborative environment (i.e., Google Docs) (Yep, pretty basic here)

  7. Need for the Project (24 points) 24/105*65 = .22857*65 = ~14.857 pages/12 • Proposed target area lacks services for eligible veterans (6 points; ~3.7 pages). • Large number of veterans (or your proposed participant population) in target area are low income (6 points; ~3.7 pages) • Large number of veterans in target area who have not completed high school or have completed high school but not enrolled in postsecondary education (6 points; ~3.7 pages). • Other indicators of need for VUB project, including unaddressed academic or socio-economic problems (6 points; ~3.7 pages).

  8. “Need” Data Sources • Use only primary sources for data • U.S. Census • State Health Department • Administration of Children and Families • Workforce Board • Survey of current target population • Focus groups • Google Scholar for current journal articles referencing like projects, populations, services • Use an attention-getting quote – politician, student • Don’t mix apples and oranges • Keep hard copies or screen shots of all data

  9. Objectives (9 points) 9/105*65 = .0857*65 = 5.57 (about a page/objective)/6 Provide the objectives exactly as stated in the RFP, including your percentages. Give their words back to them. Paragraph headings for each objective: • Addresses Need: Provide baseline statistics showing what is going on in your target area. • Clear, Specific and Measurable: If the PERT provides baseline data, how will the PERT be used in the program • Ambitious and Attainable: How do you know the percentage you picked for your objective the right one?

  10. Objectives (cont.) • PSC Objective #1: • Academic Improvement on Standardized Test: 80% • Need: 65.99% of all PSC FTIC degree-seeking students failed at least one test; 100% of all new VUB participants failed at least one test. • Measurable: Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (PERT) used to measure • Ambitious/Attainable: ambitious compared to previous performance; attainable because of project services • Other objective target percentages: 75%, 70%, 60%

  11. Plan of Operation (30 points) 30/105*65 = .2857*65 = 18.57 (3 points per section, ~1.8 pages each)/23 • Plan to inform • faculty/staff: all types of internal communications • Interested individuals/organizations: existing partnerships, social agencies, targeted paid ads • Plan for identifying, recruiting, selecting participants • Identifying: Eligibility factors • Recruiting: How will you get the word out, who is responsible, restate how many participants • Selection: Process narrative and selection process flow chart; what will you do if they are not chosen

  12. Plan of Operation (cont.) • Plan for assessing individual needs and monitoring progress • Assessment tools before and after selection (i.e., PERT, learning styles, career) • Written plan of action for each individual • Progress reports • Plan for locating project within organizational structure • Reporting lines • Organizational chart

  13. Plan of Operation (cont.) • Curriculum, services and activities • Orientation • curriculum/instruction/tutoring • Workshops • admissions/financial aid counseling • Career counseling • Personal counseling • Referral to other resources • College trips and cultural events • Peer mentoring • Timelines

  14. Plan of Operation (cont.) • Plan to ensure effective and efficient administration • GPRA • Financial management • Participant records management • Personnel management • Plan to use resources and personnel to achieve project objectives and coordinate with other projects for disadvantaged students • Other college resources • Other TRIO projects, other like-projects (CROP, displaced homemakers, etc.) • Local university partners/projects

  15. Plan of Operation (cont.) • Plan to work cooperatively with parents, key administrative, teaching and counseling personnel at target schools • For adult programs (VUB), reach out to family members • Local technical centers, colleges, school districts • Follow-up plan for tracking graduates • Participant release form • National Student Clearinghouse • Alumni group • Don’t forget plan for reach-out to non-completers

  16. Applicant and Community Support (16 points)16/105*65 = .15238*65= 9.90 pages/8 College Commitments: • Facilities • Equipment • Personnel and other resources • Business Affairs • IT/Microcomputer Resources • HR/SPD • Marketing • Maintenance • Health Clinic Community Commitments: • Community outreach • Referral of participants • Accept referrals • Distribution of marketing materials • Public Service Announcements • Provide guest speakers • Invite program staff to speak • Workshops

  17. Commitment Letters • I write drafts of ALL requested commitment letters • Original letters kept on file, provide a table of all commitments in narrative (community commitments was 3.5 page table) • Name names – table should include names and titles for both internal and external commitments • U.S. Department of Education does not want “I support this funding in my city-county-state-district” letters from politicians; however … • Will they commit to referring eligible constituents? • No “match” requirement for TRIO projects, but can you quantify the “commitments” made?

  18. Quality of Personnel (8 points)8/105*65 = .07619*65 = 4.95 pages/4 • Project Director (100%) • Master’s degree • Managing project/budget, supervising staff, reports, maintaining community/education contacts • Represent project to college administration • Other personnel • Academic Coordinator/Instructor (100%) • Master’s degree • Implement academic program, supervise tutors • Recruitment/Retention Specialist (50%, shared with VSSS) • Associate’s degree • Administrative support, recruitment/follow-up

  19. Quality of Personnel (cont.) • Part-time staff • Program instructors • Lab managers/tutors • Peer mentors/tutors

  20. Plan to Employ • Where are you advertising? • TRIO listserv • Local newspapers highly read by minority populations • Council of Opportunity in Education (COE) employment listings • Give examples of current staff • Reference GEPA and EA/EO

  21. Budget & Cost Effectiveness (5 points) 5/105*65 = .0476*65 = 3.09 pages/5 • Budget is adequate & reasonable • Provide appropriate justification (i.e., historical amounts, college policy) • Be sure that all costs are allowable and are related to activities included in Plan of Operation.

  22. Evaluation Plan (8 points) 8/105*65 = .07619*65 = 4.95 pages/5 • Appropriate to project • Qualitative • Student focus groups, informal feedback • Quantitative • Enrollment rates, pre- and post-test scores • What kind of analysis (mean, frequency, distributions) • Measurable ways project is achieving objectives • Formative and summative • Project evaluation team

  23. Quality of Project Design (5 points) 5/105*65 = .0476*65 = 3.09 pages/2 • Introduction to the Logic Model • ~one page • Logic Model (one page) • Inputs • Activities/Services • Outputs • Outcomes • Evaluation • Program adjustments as needed

  24. Tables Used in Narrative • Veteran Status • Target Area/PSC demographics • Area Veteran Demographics • Poverty Status • FGIC/FTIC • Educational Attainment Rates • Homeless Daily Count • Public Assistance • Plan to inform • Curriculum/Schedule • Timeline • College Commitments • Business/Community Commitments • Budget Narrative, YR1 • Performance/Process Evaluation Plan • Comprehensive Evaluation Plan

  25. Figures Used in Narrative • Area Map • Project Selection Process • PSC VUB Organizational Chart • Logic Model for Plan of Operation and Evaluation

  26. Fatal Flaws • Applying when you’re not eligible • READ THE DIRECTIONS • Missing important deadlines • READ THE DIRECTIONS • Ineligible formatting (# of pages, margins, fonts – try to stick within “guidelines”) • READ THE DIRECTIONS • Asking for too much money (or not enough) • READ THE DIRECTIONS • Manner in which grant is submitted • READ THE DIRECTIONS, AGAIN!

  27. Depending on Spell Check to find all errors • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION • Not using appropriate grammar/punctuation • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION • Using unexplained acronyms or vocabulary • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION • Full of inconsistencies • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION • Lack of polish/Choppy • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION • Budget doesn’t match the proposed activities • HAVE SOMEONE ELSE READ YOUR APPLICATION

  28. Basic Tips • Think/write in “active” voice • Write in an “institutional” voice • Don’t write in first person • “The College” rather than “I/We” • Address eachand every guideline in RFP • Use appropriate/up-to-date data • Be persuasive • Be interesting

  29. ddouma@pensacolastate.edu 850.484.1705

More Related