200 likes | 221 Views
GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION EKURHULENI NORTH DISTRICT COMMON ASSESSMENTS. GDE VISION AND MISSION. Vision Every learner feels valued and inspired in our innovative education system Mission
E N D
GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION EKURHULENI NORTH DISTRICT COMMON ASSESSMENTS
GDE VISION AND MISSION Vision Every learner feels valued and inspired in our innovative education system Mission We are committed to provide functional and modern schools that enable quality teaching and learning to protect and promote the right of every learner to quality, equitable and relevant education. Values(L-Impact) Learner Focused Integrity Motivated Passionate Accountable Committed Truthful
CONTEXT AND VISION GDE’S 10 PILLARS FOR EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION GDE’s 10 pillars for education transformation • Curriculum and Assessment Development • Teacher Provision and Support • Leadership and Management • Infrastructure Development and maintenance • Planning, finance and resourcing • ICT in Education • Social Cohesion • School functionality including community Involvement • Skills Development • Access to quality Early Child Development (ECD) Vision and Mission Vision Every learner feels valued and inspired in our innovative education system Mission We are committed to provide functional and modern schools that enable quality teaching and learning to protect and promote the right of every learner to quality, equitable and relevant education. SOURCE: GDE Budget Speech 2014 and GDE 5-Year Plan
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS • TIMSS 2011 – Grade 9 results in Maths and Science • ANA – 2012 – Grade 6 and 9 Maths results • Grade 12 average pass percentage in Maths and Physical Science • Average pass % at EN in 2012 • 5. Many learners in grade 11 changing from Maths to Maths literacy and changing from Physical science to other subjects
AIMS OF IMPLEMENTING COMMON ASSESSMENTS Common assessments implemented with the aim of : - Exposing teachers to what national experts considered as best practise. - Ensuring that examinations are on the correct standard with the correct cognitive levels - Determining the underlying causes of the poor results in TIMSS and ANA. - Implementing intervention strategies to improve teaching and learning at schools.
IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMON ASSESSMENTS • Common assessments were implemented in 2013 ( Grade 9 learners continuing with provincial papers and gr 10 and 11 with national papers. Districts are not part of the provincial and national process of setting the papers). • All formal assessments were compiled by teachers under the guidance of district subject advisors. • Question papers are moderated by moderators and subject advisors. • It is then proof read and translated into Afrikaans, which is also then proof read. • Assessments adhere to the content area and cognitive level weightings as indicated in the CAPS document for Mathematics and Science. • All schools are welcome to participate in the district common assessments (approximately 90% of schools). • Learner scripts are moderated and results are analysed by subject advisors . • The District Director advocated for the implementation of the common assessments to all stakeholders at different platforms and in 2014 .
FINDINGS • Findings are based on analysis of learner scripts, school visits and discussions with SMT and educators of schools. • Learners perform poorly in common assessments for both maths and science. • Schools are not coping with syllabus coverage. • Activities completed in class focus on knowledge and routine procedures. • Learners struggle with terms and concepts in formal assessment. • Schools that chose to administer their own assessments were found lacking in the following aspects: • - Adherence to Caps requirement • - ATP completion • - School based moderation • - Quality of questions • 8. Analysis of learner scripts and reports from educators enable subject advisors to identify problematic topics / aspects for developmental purposes, as all schools are required to do diagnostic and statistical analysis.
CONTENT ASPECTS : MATHEMATICS • At schools with poor results: • Examples not done with learners . • Mathematics terms and concepts are mentioned but there is no evidence in the learners books of them being taught. • Insufficient activities provided per topic. • Only textbook activities evidenced . • Learners struggle as mathematical operations become more abstract and complex
CONTENT ASPECTS : SCIENCE • Scientific terms and definitions are not done formally. • Lack high level thinking skills that require learners to solve problems , think critically , evaluate , analyse • and interpret data. • Practical activities not done due to lack of resources, teachers rely mainly on theory and textbook information. • Project tasks not properly done in most schools.
IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES • PLC compiled formal assessments. Lead teachers from different clusters assist in compiling and quality assuring formal common district assessments. To ensure that familiar contexts are addressed. • Revision and intervention worksheets addressing questions of different cognitive levels are compiled and provided to schools. Action verbs were given to schools to be used in all subjects. • Keywords and formal terms are included in lesson plans. • The structure of the lesson requires the lesson to begin with examples. • For each topic, schools must do an informal assessment (based on past question papers) for diagnostic and intervention purposes. • Additional resources such as previous exam question papers , question banks and study guides developed by PLCs and district advisors are compiled and provided to schools. • Frequent monitoring and support provided to schools by Subject advisors. • Intervention and support classes are included in formal time tables. • Tracking of progress .
IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES • Content training for educators takes place every term. • HOD trainings every term focus on roles and responsibilities. • PLC meetings take place 3 times per term focusing on content training and challenges in teaching. • Educators who are struggling with content are paired. • Trainings on setting of question papers are done for schools that are setting their own question papers. • All question papers are moderated at district level . • Attendance of training and meetings are monitored to ensure that educators who are struggling are in attendance. • Schools that are behind with syllabus coverage are assisted in compiling and implementing effective catch up plans. • FET SSIP classes are held on Saturdays at schools . Subject advisor also teach. • SSIP classes for grade 9 are held on Saturdays in Tembisa and Daveyton.
NOTED IMPROVEMENTS • Number of schools writing the common district papers have improved. 92% of our schools are writing the district paper. • The structure of teaching and learning has improved at schools. • More schools are completing syllabus as per the ATP. • The standard of activities given to learners have improved in quality and quantity. • Intervention and support is evident at schools. • More educators are attending trainings and workshops. • Evidence of HODs quality assuring school set assessments. • School set question papers adhere to specified requirements as outlined in the CAPS document. • Slight improvement to the average pass percentage . • Informal tasks at schools are now compiled with the aim of improving the formal assessments. • Informal tests are compiled for each topic and administered.
CHALLENGES • More work – effective planning and preparation. • Overwhelmed HODs and overloaded teachers. • Overcrowding in classrooms. • Lack of subject specialists – especially in grade 7 . • Developed grade 8 and 9 educators migrating to FET.