1 / 28

Reflections

Reflections. On Empowerment and Professional Development Dee Parker CULI National Seminar 2009. Empowerment. Enable the teachers to contribute to their ability to exercise a measure of choice in their lives Create an environment that encourages teachers to grow in a particular direction

hertz
Download Presentation

Reflections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reflections On Empowerment and Professional Development Dee Parker CULI National Seminar 2009

  2. Empowerment • Enable the teachers to contribute to their ability to exercise a measure of choice in their lives • Create an environment that encourages teachers to grow in a particular direction • Create an action plan that is based on the way things are out there (reality) • Acknowledge the constraints that contribute to the desirable outcomes, but which permit us to choose actions for success

  3. Empowerment • Empowerment requires change • in interpersonal relationships • in the allocation of institutional resources, including uses of time and space • in the power structure at large • Empowerment allows the realization of teacher and student potential leading to liberation • Empowerment does not come quickly or easily

  4. Plus ca change… • Reaction to 1977 throughout Europe attributed poor student performance due to teachers’ lack of linguistic and pedagogical competence • MoE developed national system-wide in-service teacher education program for foreign language teachers

  5. Special Foreign Language Project (PSLS) • What? Italy developed systematic in- service teacher education (PSLS) 1978 • Why? To retrain Italian teachers of English, French, German, and Spanish • Who? Secondary school teachers • How? Collaboration by MoE and cultural agencies (US, France, Germany, Spain)

  6. PSLS • Systematic response to problems in FL teacher education in Italian schools due to: • poor student competence in FL • lack of pre- or in-service teacher education • focus of university studies on literature studies as opposed to communicative competence

  7. Purpose • To improve the standards of foreign language education for Italian students • To update the professional knowledge and linguistic competence of Italian foreign language teachers • To address the lack of pre-service education in the educational system

  8. PSLS Theoretical Assumptions • That in-service education would be more effective when it was • conducted by fellow teacher (peer education) • conducted in familiar school contexts • conducted in a collaborative way, in a non- threatening atmosphere and without pressures of assessment and evaluation • immediately applied in the teacher’s own context

  9. PSLS Assumptions • readjusted to meet the teachers’ changing needs • conducted in the target language (integrating language improvement with the development of teaching skills)

  10. Trainers • Seminar leaders selected once a year from most committed to the project • Trainers selected according to regional demand • Trainers are classroom teachers at secondary level • 10-15 sent abroad annually to US for training • 1993 seminars held in Italy • Fulbright scholars assigned regionally to support trainers

  11. PSLSOrganization • Levels: gradual reinforcement of knowledge and specific skills • Level 1 (100 hours) theoretical background in FL teaching, general language improvement • Level 2/3 (50 hours each) teaching skills, testing, evaluation, teaching literature • 1991 all levels 50 hours focusing on topics on specific areas

  12. Course Logistics • 20 participants per course – voluntary • Release time from school duties one 3-hour afternoon session per week and three intensive 8- hour days throughout the school year • No system of accreditation or career incentive for teachers or leaders until 1989 • Commitment of attending teachers • Freedom to devise own courses and to experiment

  13. PSLS Project Outcomes • Creation of pre-service education for all teachers • Support for new forms of in-service education developed locally by teachers • Closer link between practical and theoretical issues • Leaders demonstrated professional accountability by writing articles, textbooks and giving conference presentations.

  14. Durable Outcomes • Support and commitment from the organizing agencies (MoE,US Embassy) • Project’s adaptability to changing needs and conditions • Leaders and participants’ shared status • Non-invasive procedures (narratives, focus groups, lesson transcript analysis, teacher logs brought participants’ classes into the course.

  15. Network Approach to Peer Training Thailand

  16. Network Training Thailand • Attempt to replicate similar model in Thailand to train secondary school teachers (2004) • Create a network of “peer” teacher trainers who commit to work with colleagues on a bi-weekly basis throughout the school years • Organized by AUA, US Embassy RELO and MoE

  17. Training Paradigm Shift • Traditional Training “Blocktraining,” intensive short courses, often mandatory introduce new ideas or expose teachers to new techniques, BUT • Consistent on-going training with regular input and regular feedback is most effective in helping teachers adopt new practices

  18. Purpose • To prepare English teachers to deliver training modules to peer teachers on a bi-weekly basis • To apply cooperative learning principals to collaborative teaching methods • To develop support groups and organize joint activities: peer observation and feedback, team teaching, peer coaching

  19. Trainers • Most have been on the AFS teacher exchange program: one year in the USA with host family, teamed with ESL teacher • Later groups chosen with MOE to fill educational areas where no trainers existed • Trainers had to able to deliver modules in English • Trainers supported regionally by State Department English Language Fellows

  20. Training Process • 20-22 participants per course – voluntary • Commitment to become teacher trainers • 3 weeks training of trainers • Week One: From teacher to teacher trainer (SIT approach) • Weeks Two & Three: Presentation of 10 modules • Module presentation include theory, focus sessions, demonstrations, microteaching and feedback sessions

  21. Commitment • Teacher participants returned to home areas, recruited 15-20 peers on a voluntary basis, delivered 10 modules • Modules delivered bi-weekly throughout academic year • Trainees return to their schools, try out the modules, get feedbackat next session

  22. Outcomes • Project ran 7 trainings of trainers between October 2004 and May 2007 and 2 retrainings • Trainers (160) in over 60 of 76 provinces • Trainers retrained over 4500 teachers throughout Thailand in an extended period • Trainers felt commitment to teacher development

  23. Sustainable Leadership Moving from ‘Flurries of Change’ to lasting Moving from ‘Flurries of change to lasting n n improvement improvement Secondary school teachers as agents of change Secondary school teachers as agents of change n n in their communities in their communities Three Cs: Three Cs: n n Commitment to teacher development n Collaboration for success n Confidence in communicating your vision and n empowering others

  24. Changing Plans • Project unfinished • Lack of long termcommitment to project on part of stakeholders • Lack of release time for training • Trainers drawn off and transferred to other positions • Funding provided for new activities

  25. Cart Before the Horse

  26. Competence and Confidence • Majority of Thai teachers have insufficient English proficiency • Most primary teachers not trained to teach English – non-English majors • Vast number secondary school teachers unable to conduct teaching effectively in English • Non native communicative competence often based on assumed abilities of native speaker of English

  27. Competence and Confidence • Teachers self-perceptions • Lack confidence to teach in English, especially CLT • Cannot convey messages to their students in the target language • Cannot provide a good language model • Lack of creativity as teachers as teachers can not use creative language in classroom or choose creative materials

  28. Competence and Confidence • Feel more comfortable in teacher fronted class • Want textbook designed to help them out of their lack of confidence • Language tasks too abstract for those not yet conceptually capable of functioning at that level • Lack ability to change curriculum when students needs are not met

More Related