190 likes | 366 Views
NEAR-CONTACT BINARY V836 Cygni Çanakkale, 2004. Observations. Ege University Obs. (30 cm.) Turkish National Obs. (40 cm.) Date range:2000-2002 U B V filters. No brightness deficiency at 0.5 (Zhukov & Markova1994) but at ~1.1. Before the analysis. Mode definition for WD code
E N D
NEAR-CONTACT BINARY V836 Cygni Çanakkale, 2004
Observations • Ege University Obs. (30 cm.) • Turkish National Obs. (40 cm.) • Date range:2000-2002 • U B V filters
No brightness deficiency at 0.5(Zhukov & Markova1994)but at ~1.1
Before the analysis • Mode definition for WD code Evidence for (semi-detached?) configuration Breinhorst et al.(1989): “detached, but...” f2=0.98 ±0.02
f1= 0.9143 f2= 1.0008 Ωcr=2.5911 >
NCB test: the criteria • P < 1 day • Facing surfaces < 0.1 orb. radius apart X • Not in contact • 1 component at or near its Roche lobe • Hotter: A v F ; cooler: 1 v 2 later -------------------------------------------------------------- • Agreement in M-R-L relations of [Hilditch etal.(1988)] • Two comp. lines parallel to the ZAMS [Oh et al. (2000)]? • Harmony in M-R-L relations of collected data Shaw (1994)
1 2 NCB A W X x
NCB A W X
Classification for 836 Shaw (1994)
about Evolution • Disadvantage: Single-lined, only f(m) • FO Vir type A.if come close enough to transfer required energy from hot to cool, photospere of the cool comp. is getting hot then A-type W UMa system. Shaw (1994) !!(AML by magnetic breaking is needed)
B. Longer-period detached system via Case-A mass transfer semi-detached (836 is here) marginal contact (not in thermal eq.) the deeper contact A-type W UMa system [Hilditch etal.(1988), Budding(1984)]
1 2 NCB A W X x
Problems and Future • Single-lined spectrae. • Prevent the morphology from varying study to study, by reducing the errors. Eg. q range: q=0.348 Ωcr=2.5699 near R.L. q=0.358 (10) Ωcr=2.5911at R.L. q=0.368 Ωcr=2.6120 at R.L. • AML: “ The secondaries of FO Vir types must be undermassive”.