140 likes | 284 Views
0 mode studies in LCLS injector gun C.Limborg-Deprey. Frequency analysis of 0-Pi mode Determination of amplitude of 0 mode voltage from Frequency domain method PARMELA simulations. Ratio of 0mode amplitude to pi mode. Ratio of 0mode amplitude to pi mode. WRONG RESONANCE.
E N D
0 mode studies in LCLS injector gunC.Limborg-Deprey • Frequency analysis of 0-Pi mode • Determination of amplitude of 0 mode voltage from Frequency domain method • PARMELA simulations
Ratio of 0mode amplitude to pi mode WRONG RESONANCE
Ratio of 0mode amplitude to pi mode WRONG RESONANCE
PARMELA Simulations • Emittance Variation vs Amplitude in the 0 mode • For a 10MV/m amplitude in 0 mode, can there any beneficial effect of the 0 mode?
PARMELA Simulationswith 0 and Pi modes Crude simulations With 5.5 k particles PARMELA Simulations even with 3 MV/m (magenta curve) in the 0 mode, there is some increase in emittance for half of the phases
PARMELA Simulationswith 0 and Pi modes • PARMELA Simulations with 20k • particles • Half of the phases degrade the emittance, the other half improve it • at 2.852 GHz, a period is 0.5 degrees longer than at 2.856 GHz
PARMELA Simulationswith 0 and Pi modes • PARMELA Simulations with 20k • Half of the phases degrade the emittance, the other half improve it • at 2.852 GHz, a period is 0.5 degrees longer than at 2.856 GHz
Looking for better tuning when 0-mode is at = 150 Varying pi mode field amplitude helps BUT Nearly enough + Sensitivity to field variation is increased + Difficulty to find 0-mode = 150 Injection phase does not help
Time domain model 3 s Klystron exciting the 0 mode Rs_0 = 4.94E+06 ; Q0_0 = 12578; Qext_0 = 10000; f_0 = 2.8526e9; 3 s Klystron exciting the PI mode Rs_0 = 4.71E+07 ; Q0_0 = 13957; Qext_0 = 6988; f_0 = 2.856e9;