Common Building Code Misunderstandings

1. Common Building Code Misunderstandings Increasing Your Awareness of the Wisconsin Commercial Building Code By Aaron Halberg, Professional Engineer Specialists in Post Frame Engineering |www.halbergengineering.com |P: (866) 694-8602 | F: (866) 391-0916 | |10335N DUFFY RD |HAYWARD WI 54843 |

2. Code Topics to Focus on Today: • Areas Frequently Misunderstood • Awareness of “Complex” Issues • Areas with Large Cost Impacts • Areas being revised in the 2011 Code • A discussion of Snow

3. Commercial = Public or Place of Employment As with any law, there are exceptions so be sure to read the fine print!

5. Wisconsin Commercial Building Code Comm. 61-66 : “The Code” • Adopts the IBC and other Standards by reference. • Includes specific amendments which “trump” the International Codes and Standards. • New version this year using 2009 I-Code and new amendments

6. Some changes coming in 2011 • Live/Work units introduced • Storm Shelter design standards defined • Compliance required for Envelope Tightness in “R” occupancies • Presumptive Soil Loads must be reduced by ½ for soil bearing values. • Posting requirement for owners/occupants in Frost Protected Shallow Foundation buildings.

7. Some changes coming in 2011 • Truss Design and bracing requirements… new provisions for trusses spanning over 60’ require a designer to create bracing plans per latest TPI Standard. • This requirement is exempted from Commercial buildings in Wisconsin. • Should (?) be enforced in buildings that are not Wisconsin Commercial buildings.

8. Truss Bracing from BCSI Guide

9. Occupancy Classification“Use” of the building

10. Building Volume • Used for Plan Review Threshold (and for some municipalities, who can perform the Review) • Includes all space from Roof Deck to Lowest Floor and out-to-out on Walls • Neglect volume under overhangs unless they are intentionally large enough for storage, occupancy, or other use of the roof.

12. Plan Review Thresholds - Current

13. Plan Review Thresholds - Current 40’ x 64’ x 14’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 48,600 ft3: Register or Local Review (where available) 40’ x 64’ x 16’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 51,700 ft3: State Plan Review required

14. Plan Review Thresholds – Proposed

15. Plan Review Thresholds - Proposed 40’ x 64’ x 14’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 48,600 ft3: State Plan Review or Local Review (where available) 40’ x 64’ x 16’ at 4/12 with 8” heel = 51,700 ft3: State Plan Review required

16. Delegated Municipalities • Eau Claire County and Waushara County offer plan review for buildings less than 50,000 ft3 throughout those 2 counties. • Additionally, over 200 individual municipalities (Towns, Villages, or Cities) throughout the state offer similar services. • As the participating municipalities change over time, check for the latest information available through the Safety & Buildings website. http://commerce.wi.gov/SB/

17. Occupancy Classificationand Building Size Only some occupancies shown. All occupancy classifications and construction types have data shown in the code.

18. Occupancy Classificationand Building Size So how big can you make a building? This is where it can get complex quickly! • Allowable building area per floor may be increased with credits for: • Frontage Access (up to 75% increase) • Sprinkler Protection (up to 300% increase) • There are several options available when more than one occupancy classification exists in the same building. Separation between occupancies may be required, but not necessarily. • Legitimate Mezzanine Areas do not add to the building area (they do count as part of fire areas).

19. Occupancy Classificationand Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds *Woodworking places, Commercial Truck & Bus parking, and others have lower thresholds.

20. Occupancy Classificationand Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds To build as large as possible without a fire sprinkler requirement, both the Automatic Sprinkler Thresholds and Allowable Building Area Limits must be satisfied. They are not the same!

21. Building Height Limit • No modification of limit and not dependent on Occupancy Classification • Defined as distance from Grade Plane to the average height of the Highest Roof Surface • Type VB Construction: 40 ft Type IIB and IIIB: 55 ft

22. Exterior Rated Walls: Except for High Hazard (H) Occupancies, 10’ of FSD is enough to avoid Fire Rated Exterior Walls

23. Allowable Area of Openings in Exterior Walls: (Doors and Windows)

24. At least 20’ of space is required to get some credit. This scenario shows NO increase available to the red building. Area Increase for Perimeter Access

25. With 30’ of space around entire perimeter, the maximum 75% increase may be obtained. Area Increase for Perimeter Access

26. Building Size and Location Tips “Tight” site: • Maintain 20’ building between buildings if possible. • Maintain at least 10’ from face of building to property lines. • Lot line setback on road side is usually not an issue since IBC measures from building to road centerline. • Always confirm local zoning setback requirements in addition to State code requirements. Both can have an impact on project size on “tight” building sites.

27. Building Size and Location Tips “Flexible” sites: • Maintain at least 30’ building between buildings and to lot lines if maximizing allowable area is desirable. • If 30’ space must be violated, minimize the amount of violation to maximize remaining credit allowed. • Consider future expansion plans in locating the building, even when beyond owner’s current scope. • For certain occupancies, “Unlimited Area” may be permitted with 60’ of space around entire building.

28. Other Complex Code Issues • Building Additions - why? • Allowable Area • Fire Wall / Fire Separation • Accessibility and Egress Plans • Structural Issues (Snow Drifts?) • New Building close to Existing buildings or to property lines • Local code requirements • Wetlands

29. Structural Issues Does wind or snow or gravity affect commercial and code exempt buildings differently? What’s your contingency plan when you find yourself in a Code Exempt building during a “commercial” quality storm?

30. What are your building standards based on? Would you publish your motto if it is: “This is how we’ve always done it.” “Our design includes as much strength as the owner’s bank can finance.” “This isn’t how we normally do it, but since you’ve got another contractor ready to build it for less, we’ll try it your way.”

31. Our Current “Pattern” for Ground Snow Loads (ASCE 7 map)

32. Our Actual Snow Fall received in the Winter of 07-08:

33. Design Recommendations Don’t ignore developments in standards and codes regarding snow and wind and other design developments that can benefit Code exempt buildings. If you’re not able to custom design each building, consider having your “design system” reviewed by an engineer you can trust (and afford) Use the Minimum Design Loads for Buildings (ASCE 7) as a basis for ALLyour building designs. If you decide to go lower than the normal “safety factor” adjustment for “Ag” or unoccupied buildings, be prepared with a good reason for it in case you need it.

34. This has been”Common Building Code Misunderstandings” Any content of this presentation which you found to be informative, useful and maybe even entertaining was intended, although it would be surprising if it happened. The WFBA was not responsible for the content of this presentation but they probably wish they were. By Aaron Halberg, Professional Engineer Specialists in Post Frame Engineering |www.halbergengineering.com |P: (866) 694-8602 | F: (866) 391-0916 | |10335N DUFFY RD |HAYWARD WI 54843 |