1 / 20

MPI ESM Project Super Volcano

MPI ESM Project Super Volcano . Claudia Timmreck, Hauke Schmidt , and super volcano project group 31 May 2007. What is a super eruption ?.

holt
Download Presentation

MPI ESM Project Super Volcano

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MPI ESM Project Super Volcano Claudia Timmreck, Hauke Schmidt, and super volcano project group 31 May 2007

  2. What is a super eruption ? Super eruptions “are defined to be those eruptions yielding in excess of 1015kg of products (>150 times the mass of the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo)” (Mason et al, 2004). Super eruptions are estimated to occur with a minimum frequency of 1.4 events/Myr (Mason et al, 2004), but in Earth history there were episodes with higher frequency.

  3. Historic super eruptions • Toba: The super eruption of the Indonesian volcano Toba 71-73 ± 5 ka BP (Rose and Chesner, 1987; Oppenheimer, 2002) was the largest known Quaternary eruption • Yellowstone: Three super eruptions at Yellowstone are known: the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff eruption with an volume of erupted material of 2500 km3 2.1 Ma ago, the Mesa Falls Tuff eruption with 280 km3 erupted material 1.3 Ma ago and the Lava Creek Tuff eruption with a volume of 1000 km3 640000 years ago (e.g., Smith and Siegel, 2000). • Further possible sites for super volcanos: Phlegrean Fields west of Naples, Lake Taupo (NZ), ….

  4. Yellowstone Volcanic System These eruptions spread volcanic ash over large parts of the North American continent, covering up to 1/3 of the continent with silicate ash of at least 10 cm depth.

  5. Why study super volcanic eruptions? Global scientific questions • What would be the global impact of a present day Yellowstone eruption (USA) or an eruption of the Phlegrean fields (Italy) ? -> Advices for environmental, economic social and political consequences • Was the Young Toba Tuff eruption (74±2kyr BP) responsible for a bottle neck in human population around 70 kyr BP ? • Can super volcanic eruptions trigger ice ages ? This project should help to understand past climate changes.

  6. Why study super volcanic eruptions? Super volcanos constitute extremely strong forcing to all compartments of the Earth system: • Changes in surface albedo and atmospheric radiation • Direct effect on vegetation • Massive global cooling over several years (decades) -> Impact on vegetation e.g tropical rainforest • Stratospheric warming • Changes in atmospheric circulation (AO) and chemical composition (e.g. ozone depletion) • Changes in sea level and ocean heat content • Impact on the carbon cycle (e.g. change in NPP, marine bioproductivity) • Impact on water cycle (e.g. reduced tropical precipitation) This project should help to understand the feedback mechanisms of the Earth system.

  7. Impact of Large Tephra Deposit on Vegetation and Climate

  8. Impact of Large Tephra Deposit on Vegetation and Climate • Tephra (Greek: ash): Fragments of rock and magma ejected from volcanic eruptions, ranging in size from <2mm to >1m. • Effect of tephra deposits on vegetation and surface: • Dying of vegetation • Change of surface fluxes (canopy/ground - air) • Change of surface albedo • Change of surface and soil hydrology • These changes will have large and potentially long-lasting impacts on weather, climate and the CO2 cycle on continental and even global scales. • We use the MPI Earth System Model including ECHAM5 (atmosphere), MPIOM (ocean), HAMOCC (marine biogeoche-mistry) and JSBACH (terrestrial biosphere).

  9. Distribution of Tephra Deposit for a Yellowstone Super-Eruption Tephra depth after initial deposit Tephra depth 5 years after eruption Tephra cover fraction after initial deposit Tephra cover fraction 5 years after eruption (R. Schnur et al., MPI-M) Tephra Depth after initial deposit Tephra Depth after initial deposit

  10. Preliminary Results, JJA Difference in LAI Difference in Upward CO2 flux 10-8 kg/m2/s Difference in Surface Albedo Differences for JJA taken from three-year averages: (2-4 years after eruption) – (1-3 years before eruption) (R. Schnur et al., MPI-M)

  11. A coupled simulation with MAECHAM5-MPIOM

  12. ECHAM5/MPIOM-ERA40 MAECHAM5-ECHAM5 MAECHAM5/MPIOM - ERA40 significance Coupled ECHAM5MPIOM T63L47–T63L31 comparison Nearly uniform warming in the troposphere (below 200hPa), largest in the tropics (~0.5 K). Above 200 hPa, the difference in temperature is dominated by differences in the mean stratospheric circulation, Reduction in the coupled model temperature bias in the tropopause region and in the tropical stratosphere and upper troposphere. At the high latitudes the bias has changed sign. (M. Giorgetta et al., MPI-M)

  13. The Pinatubo test case:Radiative effects

  14. 1991 1992 Temperature anomaly at 50 hPa after Mt. Pinatubo „Old“ ECHAM5 NCEP Reanalysis Improved ECHAM5 After improvements in the SW scheme, the lower stratospheric temperature response is around 4K that is 3K less than the simulations with original ECHAM5 and is more realistic. (M. A.Thomas, MPI–M)

  15. The Pinatubo test case:A possible volcanic effect on ENSO

  16. A possible volcanic influence on ENSO o • During the winters following the three biggest eruptions in the last decades (Agung, 1963; El Chichón, 1982; and Pinatubo,1991) El Niños took place. • Paleo reconstrcutions (Adams et al, 2003) seem to indicate that large volcanic eruptions help to drive the ocean and atmosphere towards a state in which El Niño conditions are favored. • We have carried out a series of volcanic experiments with the coupled atmosphere ocean circulation model, the ECHAM5/MPIOM. • The volcanic radiative forcing is calculated online in the model using a realistic spatial-temporal distribution of aerosol optical parameters derived from satellite observations for the Pinatubo episode.

  17. Case 1, June Case 1, Jan Case 2, June Case 2, Jan Nino 3.4 SST anomalies [k] (super volcano group, MPI-M)

  18. Conclusions (Pinatubo-ENSO) • Our model results cannot support the hypothesis from Adams et al. (2003) that volcanoes enhance the possibilty of an El Niño event. Our results point in the opposite direction in accordance with new radiocarbon reconstructions (Druffel et al., 2007). • Ongoing work !!!!!!

  19. Next steps • Impact on the carbon cycle : • volcanic effect on the net CO2 bonding in the terrestrial biosphere) • Input on ocean biogeochemsitry e.g. Algal blossom (Coupling with HAMMOC is prepared) • Understanding the climate signal of historic eruptions, e.g. 1258, Tambora, less cooling in the temperature proxy as one would expected from the estimated emisssion (together with the MILLENIUM project) • Impact on sea level and ocean heat content „Krakatoa lives forever “ • ...... • A fully coupled ESM simulation of a volcanic super eruption including interactive volcanic aerosol and chemistry • This model will be useful for other issues (geo-engineering, asteroid impacts, nuclear weapons impact, ...)

  20. Last but not least • The MPI super volcano group is a MPI-M crosscuting project but it is not for MPI-M members only ! • All interested scientists are welcome to work and collaborate with us • Further information: http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/wissenschaft/working-groups/super-volcanoes.html or contact: claudia.timmreck@zmaw.de

More Related