1 / 11

Arctic SMARTIC - S trategic MA nagement of R esources in TI mes of C hange

Arctic SMARTIC - S trategic MA nagement of R esources in TI mes of C hange. Rapid summer Arctic sea ice loss is leading to new interests in both preserving and developing Arctic resources . Sea Ice Projections End of Winter End of Summer. ~2010. Thickness. Thickness. ~2040.

homer
Download Presentation

Arctic SMARTIC - S trategic MA nagement of R esources in TI mes of C hange

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Arctic SMARTIC -Strategic MAnagement of Resources in TImes of Change Rapid summer Arctic sea ice loss is leading to new interests in both preserving and developing Arctic resources

  2. Sea Ice ProjectionsEnd of Winter End of Summer ~2010 Thickness Thickness ~2040 http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/future/sea_ice.html

  3. Actual Resolution of Decades-Long Territorial Dispute Between Norway and Russia (Area 4) using “Getting to Yes” Negotiation Strategy and Marine Spatial Planning

  4. Marine Spatial Planning • http://maps.grida.no/region/geoarctic http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf http://portal.inter-map.com/ http://www.arcticdata.is/ 1 3 2 4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Spatial_Planning

  5. Negotiation Strategy: “Getting to Yes” • Separate the people from the problem • Think of the negotiation as a means to solving a problem and the people on the other side as partners helping to find a solution. • Focus on interests, not positions • It's important to communicate your interests to the other party. Don't assume they have the same interests as you or that they know what your interests are. Don't assume you know what interests the other party has. • Invent options for mutual gain • Don't judge the ideas people bring forward, just get them on the board. Invent ways of making the other party's decisions easy. • Insist on using objective criteria • Objective criteria need to be independent of each side's will. • … Invent a list of actions you might take if no agreement is reached http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_to_YES

  6. SMARTIC Phase i

  7. SMARTIC Game Play: Phase I • The area to be managed in the Arctic marine region. • The goals and objectives are to prepare a multiuse management plan. • As players in this game, you will first mark on the large map up to 3 areas of high priority interest or concern for your stakeholder based on the maps and information provided to you • Once all areas of interest are marked on the map, you will negotiate using the “Getting to Yes” strategy with the goal of coming up with a multi-use management plan for the area, as well as options for resolving conflicts among the stakeholders • Each Stakeholder has several resource cards that they can use as they see fit during the negotiation • Stakeholders can either choose to have the resource cards open, available for all to see, or private, so only they are aware of which type of assets they have, as well as how many they have left.

  8. SMARTIC Phase II

  9. SMARTIC Game Play: Phase II • A crisis occurs (see options provided) • Respond to crisis in the role of your stakeholder • Negotiate new management strategies as needed

  10. SMARTIC debrief

  11. SMARTIC Debrief • How did players resolve strategies within the different groups? • Did the strategies change from one region to another as the environmental conditions changed, or due to involvement of different stakeholders? • How did the crisis influence the strategies? • Was it better to keep your negotiation resources private? • Or open for all to see? • Which stakeholders are typically in alignment? • Which stakeholders are typically in conflict? • Which stakeholders stand to gain most? • Which stakeholders stand to gain least? • In this version of the game, you played the role of stakeholders. In reality, national governments are making most of these decisions. • Which countries stand to gain most, based on the management strategies you chose? • Which countries stand to gain least?

More Related