350 likes | 532 Views
CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING Barry Dalal-Clayton Learning and Leadership Group: Uganda 24-25 July 2012. Outline of presentation. Why do we need EM? What is EM and what does it achieve? Making choices about EM – entry points & tactics The drivers/constraints of EM.
E N D
CHALLENGES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING Barry Dalal-Clayton Learning and Leadership Group: Uganda 24-25 July 2012
Outline of presentation • Why do we need EM? • What is EM and what does it achieve? • Making choices about EM – entry points & tactics • The drivers/constraints of EM
… is breaching ecological limits… Loss of biodiversity Deforestation Soil erosion Pollution Rapid population growth Climate change
MAINSTREAMING ENVIRONMENT NEVER MORE URGENT Arctic sea ice, Sept ‘07
60% of ecosystems are degraded (MA 2005) • Cost = 11% of GDP UNEP, 2010) • From article in “Nature”, 2009 • Inner blue shading represents the proposed safe operating space for nine planetary systems. • Red wedges represent an estimate of the current position for each variable – 3 exceeded Breaching planetary boundaries
Environmental trends remain negative Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 GEO 4 2007 Human produced N Fisheries collapse – Atlantic Cod Changes in species abundance by region Pollutants – residence in atmosphere Soils with high water erosion risk
Condition of planet? • World is suffering from “Environmental Deficit Disorder” (taking a Gaia (organism health) perspective – James Lovelock) • Foolish environmental devaluation & asset liquidation (taking an economic/business perspective) “The planet will strike back as a result of bad decisions by people” WHO
ENVIRONMENT IS STILL AN EXTERNALITY IN DECISIONS ENVIRONMENT is • Not certain • Not predictable • Not valued • Not priced • Not traded • Not owned • Not scrutinised • Not on the political agenda UK: Top national political concerns Climate change concern
The political economy of environment is weak Envir. and dev‘t institutions separate – different worlds! Finance dominates dev’t – $/day, 0.7% aid, budget support But finance ‘missing’ from environmentin national budgets (c. 1%)? City budgets (10% Quezon) Envir. is treated as technical – but its politics are toxic (Greenpeace) Envir. language confuses – goods/bads? science/values? Envir. stakeholders ‘push’– don’t understand mainstream
Environmentalists – not always listened to ‘Who are the bossiest people on earth?’ • Politicians • Religious leaders • Right-wing newspapers • Environmentalists I’M AN ENVIRONMENTALIST. THINK LIKE ME!
Donors are also demanding EM, and are key drivers • Upstream policy/budget issues and not only projects • Thus donors focus on SEA, ‘country systems’ and climate change integration • Need to move beyond env ‘safeguards’ towards positive ENR use • But ‘mainstreaming’ can be a turn-off word: • too many issues being ‘mainstreamed’ • assumes the mainstream is on the right track • ‘integration’ may be better (as in Spanish, French)
Environmental Mainstreaming is critical for sustainable development and green economy Beware upsetting the fine balance Social Economic Environment Environment
CHALLENGE • Integrating environment into development policy, planning and investment never more urgent, eg • Climate-proofing infrastructure and agriculture • Making industry water-efficient and clean • Tackling environmental deprivations of poor people
ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING – A definition “The informed inclusion of relevant environmental concerns into the decisions and institutions that drive national, sectoral, city and local development policy, rules, plans, investment and action” (IIED, 2009)
EM: spectrum of outcomes • Improved awarenessof environment • Improved information baseon environment • Improved participation and voiceon environment • Improved policy, law, plan, strategyon environment • Improved capacity to address environment • Improved budget and financeto tackle environment • Improved environmental conditions • In any country , who are the different actors best placed to promote and help mainstreaming?
Choice of ‘entry point’ Where to build bridges between environment and development worlds? • Govt authorities, or non-govt (business, watchdogs)? • Env authorities, ordevelopment authorities? • Env as a sector, orcross-cut, orone issue e.g. climate? • Existing decision-making (national /city plans), or special (SD strategy)? • Plan, or upstream (economic policy / rights) or downstream (pilot projects)? • National level, or a district, or a sector? • Stop bad practice, orsupport existing good, or innovate?
Choice of tactics for mainstreaming • Language: • Speak ‘economics’ (still the main language of policy discourse) not ‘environmentalese’ • Speak ‘development’ (jobs and growth) not ‘no growth’ • Work with politicians and offer solutions, not speaking at them • Focus: on financial decisions (budget is key) • Present costs, benefits, risks of env integration • Attitude: potentials, not only negative safeguards • ‘Glimpses’ of desirable outcomes, plus enabling conditions • Authority: further strengthen our moral and scientific • Involve poor groups; public opinion surveys; accountability • Offer specific evidence/cases, not only generic
MAIN ACTORS • Environmental organisations • As regulatory authorities, service delivery organisations, environmental NGOs, • Civil society groups – representing people especially dependent on the environment • Improve efforts to influence ‘the mainstream’ to integrate environment • Lobbying, case-making, collaboration, providing information • Assert broad vision of Environmental Mainstreaming • Mainstream development organisations • Central, sectoral & cityplanning and finance authorities • Delivery organisations • Corporations • National + local levels • Need to understand how environment affects development interests; + associated costs-benefits-risks + their distribution • How to meet international / national environmental obligations
Mainstreaming approaches • Broad tactics (ways of raising issues and making a case/getting heard, eg campaigns, lobbying) • Promoting/enabling institutional change (strategic level approaches); • Specific (more micro) instruments, technical tools and analytical methods (eg for gathering information, planning and monitoring); • Methods for consultation and engaging stakeholders; and also • Range of more informal, voluntary and indigenous approaches
Looking for tools to help? Stuck? Confused?
Economic & financial assessment CBA, green accounting Impact assessment & strategic analysis EIA, SEA, SoE, Natural Step Spatial assessment LUP, poverty mapping Monitoring & evaluation Indicators, audits, SD reporting Policy analysis Stakeholder, institutional, governance mapping Participation & citizens’ action PLA, citizens’ juries Political analysis & action Discourse-shaping, coalition-forming, manifestos, commissions Conflict management Dispute resolution, arbitration CATEGORISING APPROACHES/TOOLS INFORMATION DELIBERATIVE& ENGAGEMENT PLANNING & ORGANISING • Legal tools • Public interest litigation, rights regime • Visioning • Scenarios • Management planning & control • QMS/EMS, ISO, risk assessment, threshold analysis
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) Cost benefit analysis (CBA) ISO standards********************************** Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) Monitoring (general) Indicators********************************** Land use planning Environmental audits Environmental management system (EMS) Public participation (general) Geographic information system Green/natural resource accounting State of environment report Certification Life cycle analysis Eco-management & audit system (EMAS) Workshops & seminars Public hearing Public consultation Community meetings Community-based NR management Conflict management Multi-stakeholder consultation / processes Risk assessment Media (campaigns) Economic valuation Legal frameworks / guidelines TOP APPROACHES/TOOLS IDENTIFIED BY USERS IN COUNTRY SURVEYS
Linking tools and the Policy/planning cycle – opportunities & leverage points Facilitation & enabling mechanisms
Environmental mainstreaming in planning & policy-making? The two best options are: integrated processes merged processes Planning EM
Linking EM tools/approaches Influence Better PPP.Decisions & Investments Information Deliberation & engagement= Dialogue Planning & organising Green economy
Keyconstraints to environmental mainstreaming • Lack of political will • Lack of understanding & awareness (of environmental issues) • Lack of data / information • Lack of skills **************************************** • Lack of human resources • Lack of funding • Lack of awareness of available tools ******************************************************** • Over-complicated/overlapping environmental legislation • Lack of (access to) methodologies/tools - that work • Corruption • Fragmentation of environmental responsibilities
www.Environmental-Mainstreaming.org Environment Inside