1 / 38

A framework for setting flow and allocation limits - Nelson

This framework by Nelson Joe Hay provides guidance on setting flow and allocation limits for sustainable water management, including factors influencing stream ecology, species flow requirements, and environmental flow regimes. It covers key components of flow management, methods for assessing instream flow, and considerations for protection levels. The framework suggests historical flow approaches, habitat modeling, and risk assessment to ensure efficient water allocation while safeguarding ecosystem processes. Recommended allocation limits and protection levels are detailed based on naturalized flow statistics and flow security. The text outlines considerations for flow statistics, minimum flow requirements, and supplementary allocations within catchments.

hooverl
Download Presentation

A framework for setting flow and allocation limits - Nelson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A framework for setting flow and allocation limits - Nelson Joe Hay 15 december 2016

  2. A bit about me • Resident in the Maitai catchment • Freshwater Biologist, Cawthron Institute for last 13 years (last 5 ½ yrs as a contractor) • Member of FoM • Maitai FMU group member • Involved in research and provide advice to councils and other stakeholders throughout NZ • Mainly relating to water allocation management and freshwater fish

  3. Flow is A defining feature of streams • Flow a “master variable” in streams. • Influences many aspects of stream ecology, including: • Channel form • Transport of sediment, nutrients and food down a river system • and the distribution and behaviour of organisms.

  4. What flow features need attention?

  5. Flow requirements of different species Slow water species Fast water species

  6. Determining environmental flow needs – where do we start? • Identify instream values • Define instream management objectives • Focus on critical values • those that have highest value and highest flow needs • in larger rivers these are typically salmonids and birds • Focus on critical flow related environmental requirements (attributes) • physical habitat (space) • fish passage • food • water quality (temperature, oxygen, etc.) MFE 1998 - Flow Guidelines for Instream Values

  7. NPS-FM water quantity objectives • 1. To safeguard life-supporting capacity, ecosystem processes and indigenous species including their associated ecosystems in sustainably managing the taking, using, damming, or diverting of fresh water. • 2. To avoid any further over-allocation of water and phase out existing over-allocation. • 3. To improve and maximise the efficient allocation and use of water. • 4. To protect the significant values of wetlands and outstanding freshwater bodies.

  8. Key Components of flow management (required by NPS-FM) • Minimum flow is the flow at which abstraction must be restricted or cease • Provides refuge for instream values during periods of low flow • Allocation limit is the rate (or volume) that water can be extracted • Protects instream values by controlling length of low flow period and maintaining some flow variability • Maintains reliability of supply to abstractors

  9. Environmental flow regime

  10. Two main Instream flow assessment methods • Historical flow methods • Habitat methods

  11. Habitat methods Brown trout adult feeding habitat preferences Suitability Suitability Depth Velocity Suitability Substrate index Habitat

  12. Historical flow methods Historical flow method Biological response Flow

  13. Habitat methods vs historical flow methods Historical flow method Biological response Habitat method Flow

  14. Technical Assessment methods • Historical flow methods • Generalised habitat modelling • Hydraulic habitat modelling • Water quality modelling • Ecohydraulics modelling • ++ many more Assume status quo is best Assume linear response to flow Non-specific Easily applied Assumes habitat (or WQ) is limiting Non-linear flow response Linked with specific values Data hungry Expensive Controversial

  15. Protection levels • Risk management • High value then accept minimal risk • minimum flow provides 90-100% habitat retention at naturalised MALF • allocation limit 10-20% of MALF • Lower value then accept more risk • minimum flow provides 70-80% habitat retention at naturalised MALF • allocation limit 20-30% of MALF

  16. Common Approach in other regions • Historical flow methods to guide broad-scale flow management decisions • Detailed instream habitat analysis for rivers with very high values and/or large flow alteration • Protection levels based on risk assessment • Allocation limits set based on security of supply

  17. Other considerations • Flow statistics – 7Day or 1Day • Naturalising flow statistics • Minimum flow equals cease take • Restriction trigger and number of steps • Security of supply • Supplementary allocation (high flow harvesting) • Scaling limits within catchments • Cumulative allocation Consented and permitted

  18. Recommended framework • Historical flow approach across all classes (except Maitai and Roding where habitat modelling available) • Where naturalised flow statistics are not available, set more conservative interim limits • Minimum flow equals % of naturalised 7Day MALF High value sites 90-100% Lower value sites 70-80% • Allocation limit equals % of 7Day MALF High value sites 10-20% Lower value sites 30% • Minimum flow equals cease take

  19. Whangamoa FMU Collins River

  20. Flow recorder site Flow record not influenced by abstraction 6 species of native fish recorded Moderate sized stream Collins River at Drop

  21. Collins River at Drop

  22. Collins River– Security of supply

  23. Wakapuaka FMU Wakapuaka River @ Hira

  24. Flow recorder site Flow record influenced by abstraction upstream (including Teal and Lud) 8 species of native fish recorded Locally important trout fishery, of high local value Large stream Wakapuaka River at Hira

  25. Wakapuaka River at Hira

  26. Wakapuaka River at Hira

  27. Stoke FMU Orphanage Stream

  28. Flow recorder site Flow record influenced by small permitted abstraction 11 species of native fish recorded Small stream Orphanage Stream at Ngawhatu

  29. Orphanage Stream at Ngawhatu

  30. Or 80% of MALF minimum flow? Depends on mgmt. objectives. Orphanage Stream at Ngawhatu

  31. Maitai FMU Todds Valley Stream

  32. Synthesised flow record Flow record influenced by large volume abstraction 7 species of native fish recorded Small stream Potential peak permitted take exceeds low flows Todds Valley Stream at SH6

  33. Todds Valley Stream at SH6

  34. Or 100% of current MALF? Since flow statistics already influenced by proportionally large abstraction Todds Valley Stream at SH6

  35. Maitai FMU Maitai River

  36. Flow recorder site Flow record influenced by large abstraction upstream (municipal supply) 11 species of native fish recorded Large stream Habitat modelling undertaken for upper and middle reaches Maitai River at Avon Terrace

  37. Maitai River at Avon Terrace

  38. Maitai River at Avon Terrace

More Related