1 / 8

NIH Paylines (May 2010)

NIH Paylines (May 2010). Institute New Invs . NCI 15% 20% NIAID 11% 16% NHLBI 16/12% --- NIDDK 17% 19% NINDS 13-16% (~22% overall) NIAMS 15% 20% NIMH up to 20% NIA 8% 13%. http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/.

houston
Download Presentation

NIH Paylines (May 2010)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NIH Paylines (May 2010) • InstituteNew Invs. • NCI 15% 20% • NIAID 11% 16% • NHLBI 16/12% --- • NIDDK 17% 19% • NINDS 13-16% (~22% overall) • NIAMS 15% 20% • NIMH up to 20% • NIA 8% 13% http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/

  2. How Did NIA Get to 8%? 30 25 NIMH NIDDK 20 NHLBI Payline (%) NCI The payline for NIA was similar to other major Institutes in 2007-8. However, the payline at NIA has declined constantly over the past 2 years. NIA 15 10 5 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year http://www.einstein.yu.edu/ogs/NIHInfo/paylines.htm

  3. Changes in NIA Funding and Grant Applications Since 2005 Total Budget RPG Budget # of Applications 2009* $1.08B $715M 2,113 Change +2.9% +1.3% +22% 2005 $1.05B $706M 1,729 * Data does not include ARRA funds or applications From NIA Database

  4. Changes in Funding (Direct Costs) of RPGs Based on Size of Grant Size of Grant Direct Costs($/Yr) < $300K $300K - $1.5M $1.5M - $3M >$3M 2009 23.7% 41.9% 20.9% 13.4% Change -46% NC* +67%** +362%*** 2005 43.6% 41.0% 12.5% 2.9% * Although the total percent funding was similar for grants in this range, the percent of funds for P01 grants decreased 50% and funding for U01 grants increased over 5-fold ** Increase due equally to increased funding of large R01s, P01s, and U01s *** Increase only due to increased funding of U01 grants. From NIA Database

  5. Changes in Funding (Direct Costs) of RPGs Based On Type of Grant Type of Grant R01, etc.* P01 U01 2009 56.3% 21.3% 21.3% Change -24%** -10%*** +719%# 2005 73.7% 23.7% 2.6% * R01, R03, R15, R21, R33, R34, R37 ** Grants under $300K decreased 45% (from $308M to $169M) while grants over $300K increased 7% from $212M to $226M. *** The cost of P01 grants under $1.5 M per year decreased 45% (from $92M to $50M while the cost of P01s over $1.5 M per year increased 34% (from $76M to $103M). # The total dollars for U01s increased from $18M to $167M (827% increase in total dollars). From NIA Database

  6. w w w The total funds for NIA (and funds for RPGs) has changed very little between 2005 and 2009 (less than 3%) while applications have increased over 20%. Smaller grants, e.g., R01s and P01s, have decreased ~45% between 2005 and 2009 while funding of larger grants (R01s, P01s, and U01s) has increased. Funding of U01s have increased 7- to 8-fold between 2005 and 2009. Trends in RPG funding

  7. Future Projection on NIA Payline 30 25 NIMH 20 NIDDK Payline (%) NHLBI NCI 15 NIA ? 10 5 Increase No Change 0 Decrease 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 The major questions are: (1) will the NIA payline return to the level of the other major Institutes and (2) if so, when will this happen.

  8. Disclaimers: • Data obtained from public sources, the Biology of Aging staff did not provide any of the information. • Any information from NIA Council came from the public hearing session of the Council. From: Arlan Richardson, Ph.D. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

More Related