1 / 34

Microwave Optics

Microwave Optics. Acknowledgements: Fred, Geoff, Lise and Phil Junior Lab 2002. Adam Parry Mark Curtis Sam Meek Santosh Shah. History of Microwave Optics. WW2 in England Sir John Randall and Dr. H. A. Boot developed magnetron Produced microwaves Used in radar detection

howie
Download Presentation

Microwave Optics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Microwave Optics Acknowledgements: Fred, Geoff, Lise and Phil Junior Lab 2002 Adam Parry Mark Curtis Sam Meek Santosh Shah

  2. History of Microwave Optics • WW2 in England Sir John Randall and Dr. H. A. Boot developed magnetron • Produced microwaves • Used in radar detection • Percy Spencer tested the magnetron at Raytheon • Noticed that it melted his candy bar • Also tested with popcorn • Designed metal box to contain microwaves • Radar Range • First home model - $1295

  3. How to Make Microwaves • Magnetron • Oldest, still used in microwave ovens • Accelerates charges in a magnetic field • Klystron • Smaller and lighter than Magnetron • Creates oscillations by bunching electrons • Gunn Diode • Solid State Microwave Emitter • Drives a cavity using negative resistance

  4. Equipment Used receiver transmitter

  5. Intensity vs. Distance Shows that the intensity is related to the inverse square of the distance between the transmitter and the receiver

  6. qI qR S M Reflection • Angle of incidence equals angle of reflection

  7. Measuring Wavelengths of Standing Waves • Two methods were used • A) Transmitter and probe • B) Transmitter and receiver • Our data • Method A: • Initial probe pos: 46.12cm • Traversed 10 antinodes • Final probe pos: 32.02cm •  = 2*(46.12-32.02)/10 •  = 2.82cm • Method B: • Initial T pos: 20cm • Initial R pos: 68.15cm • Traversed 10 minima • Final R pos: 53.7cm •  = 2.89cm

  8. Refraction Through a Prism • Used wax lens to collimate beam • No prism – max = 179o • Empty prism – max = 177o • Empty prism absorbs only small amount • Prism w/ pellets – max = 173o • Measured angles of prism w/ protractor • q1 = 22 +/- 1o • q2 = 28 +/- 2o • Used these to determine n for pellets • n = 1.25 +/- 0.1

  9. Polarization • Microwaves used are vertically polarized • Intensity depends on angle of receiver • Vertical and horizontal slats block parallel components of electric field

  10. Single Slit Interference Used 7 cm and 13 cm slit widths This equation assumes that we are near the Fraunhofer (far-field) limit

  11. Single Slit Diffraction – 7cm Not in the Fraunhofer limit, so actual minima are a few degrees off from expected minima

  12. Single Slit Diffraction – 13cm

  13. Double Slit Diffraction • Diffraction pattern due to the interference of waves from • a double slit • Intensity decreases with distance y • Minima occur at d sinθ = mλ • Maxima occur at d sinθ = (m + .5) λ

  14. Mirror Extension M S Double Slit Diffraction

  15. Lloyd’s Mirror • Interferometer – One portion of wave travels in one path, the other in a different path • Reflector reflects part of the wave, the other part is transmitted straight through.

  16. Lloyd’s Mirror Condition for Maximum: • D1= 50 cm • H1=7.5 cm • H2= 13.6 cm = 2.52 cm Trial 1 Trial 2 • D1= 45 cm • H1=6.5 cm • H2= 12.3 cm = 2.36 cm

  17. Fabry-Perot Interferometer • Incident light on a pair of partial reflectors • Electromagnetic waves in phase if: • In Pasco experiment, alpha(incident angle) was 0.

  18. Fabry-Perot Interferometer • d1 = distance between reflectors for max reading • d1 = 31cm • d2 = distance between reflectors after 10 minima traversed • d2 = 45.5cm • lambda = 2*(d2 – d1)/10 = 2.9cm • Repeated the process • d1 = 39cm • d2 = 25cm • lambda = 2.8cm

  19. Michelson Interferometer • Studies interference between two split beams that are brought • back together.

  20. Michelson Interferometer Constructive Interference occurs when:

  21. reflectors S M Michelson Interferometer • Split a single wave into two parts • Brought back together to create interference pattern • A,B – reflectors • C – partial reflector • Path 1: through C – reflects off A back to C – Receiver • Path 2: Reflects off C to B – through C – Receiver • Same basic idea as Fabry-Perot • X1 = A pos for max reading = 46.5cm • X2 = A pos after moving away from PR 10 minima = 32.5cm • Same equation for lambda is used • Lambda = 2.8cm

  22. Brewster’s Angle • Angle at which wave incident upon dielectric medium is completely transmitted • Two Cases • Transverse Electric • Transverse Magnetic Equipment Setup

  23. TE Case S polarization • Electric Field transverse to boundary • Using Maxwell’s Equations (1 = 2 =1) Transverse Electric Case at oblique incidence NO BREWSTER’S ANGLE

  24. TM Case P polarization • Electric Field Parallel to Boundary • Using Maxwell’s Equations (1 = 2 =1) Transverse Magnetic Case at oblique incidence

  25. Brewster’s Angle • Plotting reflection and transmission(for reasonable n1 and n2)

  26. Setting the T and R for vertical polarization, we found the maximum reflection for several angles of incident. We then did the same for the horizontal polarization and plotted I vs. theta We were unable to detect Brewster’s Angle in our experiment. Brewster’s Angle (our results)

  27. Bragg Diffraction • Study of Interference patterns of microwave transmissions in a crystal • Two Experiments • Pasco ( d = 0.4 cm, λ = 2.85 cm) • Unilab (d = 4 cm, λ = 2.85 cm). Condition for constructive interference

  28. Bragg Diffraction (Pasco)

  29. Bragg Diffraction(Unilab) Maxima Predicted • Maxima Obtained Wax lenses were used to collimate the beam

  30. Frustrated Total Internal Reflection • Two prisms filled with oil • Air in between • Study of transmittance with prism separation • Presence of second prism “disturbs” total internal reflection. Transmitter Detector

  31. Frustrated Total Internal Reflection

  32. Optical Activity Analogue • E-field induces current in springs • Current is rotated by the curve of the springs • E-field reemitted at a different polarization • Red block (right-handed springs) rotates polarization –25o • Black block (left-handed springs) rotates polarization 25o

  33. References • www.joecartoon.com • www.mathworld.wolfram.com • www.hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase • www.pha.jhu.edu/~broholm/I30/node5.html

More Related