120 likes | 142 Views
Explore the technical risks, costs, and benefits of grazing vs. normal incidence in laser systems. Learn about optical paths, mechanical layouts, and financial implications. Find insights to guide your design decisions.
E N D
Normal Laser Incidence on CathodeD. H. Dowell, SLACLCLS Week July 19, 2005 Grazing vs. Normal Incidence Issues Grazing Incidence Technical Risk Schemes for Normal Incidence Wakes Mechanical Layout Costs Summary
Grazing Incidence Optical System drawing compliments of S. Gilevich
Vacuum window In-vacuum mirror To cathode e-beam Wake field shielding tube Vacuum window In-vacuum mirror To cathode e-beam With or without second mirror Options for In-Vacuum Mirror • Options: • Single Mirror • Two Mirrors • Mirror w/ wake • mitigation tube
Optical Path DifferenceDependence Upon Lens Position (Range of Lens 2 Position 0 – 3mm) compliments of S. Gilevich
e-beam laser beam Normal Incidence Geometry figure adapted from E. Jongewaard
(2) (3) (1) Wake Calculations (C. Limborg-Deprey & Cho Kuen Ng) Emittance Budget Limit
Injector Gun-to-Linac Region Injector Layout Valve Valve Only two valves presently between gun and shield wall Valve New valve will be added here
Layout of Laser from Injection Mirror to Cathode gun solenoid cathode laser injection cross vacuum valve drawing compliments of R.F. Boyce & T. Osier
e-beam Preliminary Layout at Injection Cross drive laser beam YAG/FC cross Side View dual laser mirrors Top View e-beam wakefield plug inserted alignment laser mirror drawings compliments of R.F. Boyce & T. Osier
Summary • Reviewed normal vs. grazing incidence • Grazing incidence optics add risk to laser shaping • Wakes from dual in-vacuum mirrors tolerable • Choose dual mirrors for new baseline design • Preliminary mechanical design performed for normal-incidence • Cost difference is small • Formal CCB and BCR in progress: • Design GTL for grazing incidence with dual symmetric mirrors • Add valve after L0-A • Keep option for grazing incidence