170 likes | 264 Views
Counterplans. PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace !. What every CP needs. Cp text Net benefit Must be competitive Uniquely beneficial Mutually exclusive. Cp text. Write before the round Grammar does it accomplish what I need the CP to accomplish? How could the aff permute the cp text?
E N D
Counterplans PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!
What every CP needs • Cp text • Net benefit • Must be competitive • Uniquely beneficial • Mutually exclusive
Cp text • Write before the round • Grammar • does it accomplish what I need the CP to accomplish? • How could the aff permute the cp text? • How could the aff create a solvency deficit?
Net benefit • Internal net benefit • Independent disad • Case turns the cp avoids
CP competitiveness • The CP by itself must be better than the plan or any combination of the plan and all or part of the CP • Uniquely beneficial -CP must do something good or avoid something bad that the plan can’t. • Mutually exclusive -the aff and the cp can not happen at the same time
permutation • Tests competition of the CP • must have plan first, unaltered in content and timeframe • Many variations on permutations • Even if the perm works, the cp can still function if it is uniquely beneficial (perm still links to politics)
Counterplan status • Conditionality • Dispositionality • unconditionality
conditionality • Can kick the cp whenever you want • Still have to answer theory • Aff can still try to leverage offense • Very common • Strategic flexibility • Conditionality is okay, multiple contradictory conditional worlds is problematic
dispositionality • Can kick the cp unless it is straight turned • Only impact turns, link turns, or theory • Conceding permutations, link or impact defense will make the CP go away • Not much strategic value • Difficult to run with other worlds
unconditionality • Will go for in the 2NR • Can’t kick under any circumstances • Good to run 1 off • Everything in 1NR should work together
Types of counterplan • PIC • Consult • Condition • Advantage • Agent • This list is not exhaustive
PIC • Plan Inclusive Counterplan • Does part of the plan • Removes part of the action or replaces a word • Word PICs • Generally accepted as legitimate
condtion • Conditions plan action on an additional prior act • “USFG will do X if PRC will do Y” • Theoretically questionable • Strategically sound since it should suck up the affs offense
advantage • Does an alternative action that seeks to solve one of the advantages of the plan • Puts offense on advantages not solved by the cp • Valuable for affs with 2 or 3 advantages
agent • Is also a PIC • Does the plan through an alternative agent(XO, Courts) • Plan action is a good idea, just need to use different actor • Politics is a common NB • agent powers or legitimacy can also be NB
consult • Consults another actor on the plan action • Often has relations NB • Theoretically shady, lots of judges hate it • Strategically strong since it literally does all of the aff
Answering the cp • Permutation • Solvency deficit • Add-ons • Theory • Disads to the cp • Turning the NB