410 likes | 601 Views
Outline. State of the Industry Projecting the FutureIndustry Relations with Local Governments. Part I: State of the Industries. CATV: Making Lemons Out of the Lemonade. Achieving the Impossible: CATV Bankruptcies with 35% EBITD. Root Cause: Mortgaged the Future. Sale prices of franchisees overes
E N D
1. Street Law: The Big Picture Nicholas P. Miller
April 7, 2003
Williamsburg, VA
2. Outline State of the Industry
Projecting the Future
Industry Relations with Local Governments
3. Part I: State of the Industries
4. CATV: Making Lemons Out of the Lemonade Achieving the Impossible: CATV Bankruptcies with 35% EBITD
5. Root Cause: Mortgaged the Future Sale prices of franchisees overestimated future revenue stream--Charter
Big incentive to Overvalue and Defraud Stockholders--Adelphia
6. Problem for Local Governments: Subscriber Rates Are Skyrocketing
only “cash flow” can reduce debt
Failed Promises
increased pressure to reduce capital improvements
7. What happened to the Overbuilders? CATV and Economies of Scale
Debt Ratios of 70-80%
CLEC collapse--no Debt $
A limited business opportunity--at best
50 subs/mile
technology superior to incumbent
8. Telcos: NOT a Collapse of Competition
9. Collapsing Long Distance Competitors RBOCs have been able to restrict resale of their platform
RBOCs have gotten broad release to go into long distance
UNE-P rollout
Scams to show revenues
10. Collapsing CLECs Like CATV--Strong Economies of Scale in Local Loops
Fiber Overcapacity in
Intercity
Central Business Districts
Several emerging from bankruptcy in next few months
11. RBOC Stock Collapse Market says--
DSL cannabilizing T-l business
loss of 2d residential lines to Cable Modem
loss of 1st residential line to cellular
12. Part II: Projecting the Future
13. CATV: Where Is the New Video Product? VoD challenges post-release movie distributors
HDTV consumes chunks of video bandwidth
No “New” Programming Product on Horizon
14. Escalating Prices Unrelenting debt pressures
Both CATV and TelCos Use monopoly position to leverage other markets
Restrict Content Access to Extract Monopsony prices
15. Continued Incentive for Muni Overbuilds Use economics of joint projects
Bristow
Blacksburg
Dickenson County VA -- muni run wireless for county
Without price and competition regulation--need alternative
16. Immediate Future VoD--Cox in Fairfax and Tidewater
Rapid Cable Modem deployment
holds line against DBS
CATV/ILECs allocate broadband market
CATV residential
RBOCs Business core
17. Telcos: Lots of Local and Long Distance Competition Cable Modem superior to DSL
Wireless limiting prices for local loops
Multiple Long Distance competitors
Level III
AT&T
4 RBOCs
18. Wireless: A Growing “Edge” Market Cellular
major price competition
3 G? No real demand and very expensive rollout
still more expensive that local loops
fill-in tower expenses
19. Wireless: WiFi The overbuilder of the local loop?
Major data security problems
Not mobile--not a cellular architecture
20. More Distant Future VoIP? Universal Service Questions.
HDTV? Consumer Resistance to Tuner Costs.
Wireless: mobile “narrowband”
Fiber: fixed “broadband”
FTTH?
Muni “backbones”?
21. Part III: Industry and Local Governments
22. The Future of Adelphia What Caused the Bankruptcy?
Overpaid for acquisitions
Stockholder fraud--misrepresenting underlying revenue potential
23. Adelphia and Local Governments creditors for PEG/franchise fees
regulators NOT subject to court juris
property interest in franchise--NOT subject to court transfer
When will the bankruptcy end?
Should You Proceed with Renewal Now?
24. Other Cable Ops Comcast--the 500 lb guerrilla
TWC--Shedding Debt and Avoiding Capital $
Cox and others--limited by the Big 2 initiatives
Cable Modem Service fees and regulations
25. Telcos/CLECs Industry seeks unfettered PROW entry and free use of PROW. :
State and federal legislatures.
State and federal regulators.
Federal and state courts.
26. Forum Shopping Industry has shifted battle to state level
Michigan legislation
Florida legislation
NARUC study committee
NARUC and NCSL co-opted? Where are the Governors?
Where are the local electeds?
27. NARUC Nightmare “Big Lie” Committee Effort
unfair forum
ignored local comments
industry drafted proposal/report
Committee Report repudiated/distanced in Portland.
28. Now Back to the Federal Level FCC since 2000
Oct 16 Forum
NTIA
open docket
Call for “best practice” communities
Congress--again
29. Lesson Learned “franchise” is property interest--we win
“franchise” is regulation--we loose
30. FCC Relations with Local Governments Cable Rates
Cable Modem Regulation
Franchise Fees
Restrictions on Franchise Terms
31. Conclusion: Muni Interests Are Unchanged economic development--don’t take $ out of town
Landlord--public trustee of most valuable public asset
Largest User of Telco/Cable/Wireless Services
Public Safety
Consumer Protection
32. Questions
33. Contact Information
34. Addendum: Cable Modem Order Lessons Learned
35. Define the Issue First PROW is valuable real estate interest
PROW is Not a “Free Good”
PROW is protected by normal property law
Media doesn’t see connection between PROW problems and this debate
36. Other Local Interests Threatened Universal Service
Consumer Control of Broadband Content
Public Safety Priority to spectrum and wireline
37. Cable Modem Order: Cable modem is an “interstate information service.”
Cable modem is not a telecommunications service.
Cable modem is not a cable service.
38. Cable Modem NPRM: “Tentatively Concludes” No ISP rights to demand access to cable modem networks.
Cable franchises authorize use of PROW for cable modem service.
No additional permission required to provide cable modem service.
Cable Modem Service falls outside cable franchise fee.
39. Cable Modem NPRM: “Tentatively Concludes” Local governments may be required to rebate fees already collected.
Local government cannot require cable modem services.
40. Halt Payment Letters Most MSO’s have stopped paying franchise fees
FCC Bureau Chief told them to do so
You should respond, consistent with state law
41. Response Letter Local government retains the full rights of property ownership:
to control the use of its public rights-of-way
to charge rent for that use
253 not applicable as limit since “not a telecomm service”
The FCC Ruling does not authorize “piggyback” on a cable franchise or free PROW use
42. Response Letter Additional contract argument possible
Additional state law considerations
definition of PROW rights
preexisting “leases”
state bans on taxation of Internet service