1 / 15

CIL and Viability – The Local Authority Perspective

CIL and Viability – The Local Authority Perspective. Adam Driscoll Infrastructure Planning and Delivery Manager (Development and Regulatory Services Delivery Unit). North London Business Park, Oakleigh Road South, London N11 1NP adam.driscoll@barnet.gov.uk 020 8359 4922.

hurley
Download Presentation

CIL and Viability – The Local Authority Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CIL and Viability – The Local Authority Perspective Adam Driscoll Infrastructure Planning and Delivery Manager (Development and Regulatory Services Delivery Unit) North London Business Park, Oakleigh Road South, London N11 1NP adam.driscoll@barnet.gov.uk 020 8359 4922

  2. The London Borough of Barnet • Population increase double that of neighbouring authorities • Increase mostly in those age groups with greater need for services • Anticipated 28,000 new homes by 2026 • Declining resources for infrastructure at a time of high growth. Security marking

  3. Our Plans for Growth • - Protection of conservation areas and greenbelt, • Enhancement of existing residential areas and town centres • Significant residential development and some commercial development mainly in the West of the Borough. Security marking

  4. Producing Viability Evidence • DECISION 1: How quickly to bring CIL into place? • Political / senior officer motivations • S106 rigour at appeal • External pressures / factors • How did Barnet do it? • Existing Affordable Housing Viability Study • Model based on 4 types of site run with a range of scenarios • Paid for consultants to review and update existing study in light of Community Infrastructure Levy • Other Approaches: • High level appraisal of a model small development • Site specific viability review of major sites and recent cases Security marking

  5. Producing Viability Evidence • Lessons Learnt: • You first need corporately agreed steer on ‘the approach’ • You can shortcut the production of detailed information, provided you understand what this means in terms of the strength of your argument and options for rate-setting • Changes to your approach can easily be imposed • Collating (commercially sensitive) viability evidence submitted with recent planning applications for major developments, and putting them into a model in which to test rates would be useful given the recent CIL Regulation changes. Security marking

  6. Producing Viability Evidence • DECISION 2: Do I bring in external support? • Found to be helpful in a number of ways and unhelpful in others Security marking

  7. Rate setting • DECISION 3: Rate Setting? • Getting to the right rate for your area: • Political / senior officer motivations • Do you want to minimise change or treat as a clean slate? • Who are your local power players? How will they respond? • What are my neighbours doing? • How much of an income difference does it really make? • How did Barnet do it? • Switch from ‘maximise income’ approach to ‘low single rate’ • Consultants imposed to review the initial agreed approach. Security marking

  8. Rate setting • Lessons Learnt: • A single rate approach is problematic in practice • Complex set of rates will make it harder work in practice and makes ‘planning’ more technical and confusing for developer? • Zero rates are not the problem they once were • Referring to use classes is a very technical matter, be certain you’ve really understood the local applications you receive. • Understand the planning detail and its impact on developer decision-making: Do you want integral plant / undercroft car parking to cost more than if delivered outside the building? • Review the impact of proposed rate/s against the bigger schemes, not just the run of the mill small applications. Security marking

  9. Communication – Use the process to discuss • The CIL adoption process takes time, 1-2 years depending on your effectiveness at bringing everyone on board. • From the outset design your communication to educate the development community and to expose site specific issues quickly; to enable solutions to be found early in the process. • Use the time for getting your collection systems in place. • Make sure developers get advanced notice of CIL commencement date at least from date when final applications won’t be CIL liable (i.e. 13 weeks before adoption). Ideally 3 months before 13 week start date, to make sure applications worst affected get permission. • Use time early on to drill down into the detail for major sites, CIL issues can throw a scheme off track until resolved. Security marking

  10. Communication – The development community • You will need to make extensive allowance for educating the development community about how CIL operates in practice. • Offer 1:1 ‘CIL’ meetings with major developers in your area: • Make time allowances for changes in ownerships, silent parties can suddenly become very noisy and make life difficult • Don’t just look to corporate partners, other major sites too • Don’t underestimate partners where little appears to be happening in relation to bringing their site forwards • Engage with cases where charitable relief will not apply, particularly where they are delivering important facilities. • Ensure those reliant on existing floor space for low CIL costs think carefully about making sure that floor space counts. Security marking

  11. Communicating - Engaging with colleagues • Ensure that everyone sees CIL costs in their rightful place • Developers understand it is (ideally) less than 5% development costs (1-2% will give smoothest ride through examination) • Planners need to understand developers aren’t made of money, especially for schemes hit by the shift from a unit basis (s106 charges per residential unit) to a floor space basis (CIL). • Planners need to understand some commercial / community schemes will not have built in CIL costs when land purchased / projects were developed. Also banks are only just beginning to understand CIL costs and the cash flow impact. • Planners need to understand: • existing floor space and relief assessments, • transition arrangements for different types of application, • how the CIL calculations work, as developers often don’t looks at regulations when quantifying the cost of CIL for their scheme. Security marking

  12. Things to watch out for • Long standing / problem sites (minor amendments vs. new applications, retention applications and sites coming in for repeated planning applications despite previous approvals) • Cost of CIL can be significant burden that could throw smaller developers into administration • S106 balance with CIL on major sites discretionary relief, negotiating relevant contributions if CIL in place, allowing for future changes to CIL rate on multi-phase schemes…etc. • Unusual sites such as large multi-storey car parks, house-boats / moored hotels, student accommodation, office conversions to residential. • Building control and capturing permitted development cases. Security marking

  13. Getting CIL collection systems in place • IT systems – start early to make sure your tracking of planning permissions, issuing of notices and collection of funds is easy. • Staff capacity and training – make sure you are up to date with existing planning obligation collection, understand how the CIL collection processes will work and have staff to deliver them. • Local land charges – make sure you sort out the link to ensure land charges are automatically updated with any notices issued. • Unusual sites such as large multi-storey car parks, house-boats / moored hotels, student accommodation, office conversions • Building control and capturing permitted development cases. Security marking

  14. Discussion and Questions • Example further matters you may like to discuss: • Example cases of CIL and the liability issues that arise • Exceptional Circumstances Relief • Regulation 123 lists and setting up CIL expenditure systems • Infrastructure Planning • Changes in CIL guidance / proposed regulation changes Security marking

  15. Contracting out your CIL function • The Local Authorities (Contracting Out of Community Infrastructure Levy Functions) Order 2011 • permits the CIL collection function to be outsourced • London Borough of Barnet is creating a joint-venture company with Capita Symmons to deliver all regulatory services (e.g. planning). • Joint-venture will be live from October 2013 • Seeking to offer a comprehensive CIL support service at competitive rates, including: support through CIL charging schedule process and CIL collection function. • Please get in touch if you are interested in discussing any support that we may be able to offer your authority with CIL. Security marking

More Related