310 likes | 457 Views
Wet Weather Sampling to Fulfill MS4 NPDES Permit Requirements run, run fast, run away now. Annette DeMaria, P.E. Staff Engineer Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. . Michigan Water Environment Association Phase I and II Storm Water Permitting Workshop December 9, 2009.
E N D
Wet Weather Sampling to Fulfill MS4 NPDES Permit Requirementsrun, run fast, run away now Annette DeMaria, P.E. Staff Engineer Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. Michigan Water Environment Association Phase I and II Storm Water Permitting Workshop December 9, 2009
Permit Requirements (Watershed Permit) • Standard Approach • Collect 1 representative sample from 50% of major discharge points w/in the TMDL portion of the urbanized area. • Use this information to identify actions to reduce E. coli/Phosphorus. • Or if data is available • Submit an existing plan that prioritizes areas and actions for controlling the pollutant • Elective Option • Work collaboratively to develop and implement a monitoring program to determine priority areas requiring further actions.
What do these terms have in common? • Act naturally • Almost perfect • Jumbo shrimp • One representative sample They are all oxymorons
Presentation Focus • Findings areas/sources of elevated E. coli/ Phosphorus via wet weather sampling (while fulfilling the permit requirements)
Review Available Data Should help determine where to focus efforts, potential sources and elements of your sampling plan • Ambient water quality and quantity data • Watershed studies • Beach data • USGS flow data • TMDL data • IDEP data
Determine your Budget • Internal resources • Expertise • Field personnel • Equipment • Lab services • External resources • Consultants
Define the Area of Interest • Watershed • Sub-watershed • Sub-basin • Jurisdiction
Various Monitoring Approaches • Stream/tributary monitoring • If you have limited data telling you where to focus your efforts • Discharge point monitoring • To identify which outfalls to investigate in a previously defined problem area • In-system (investigative) monitoring • To further narrow down the source area, if you know any outfall is “hot”
Sampling Approaches • Collect routine data and evaluate against stream flow conditions • More data intensive, but less staff intensive • Create load duration curves to determine the weather/stream conditions associated with the impairment • Collect wet weather data only • Very, very, very, very resource intensive
Example Load Duration Curve http://www.ehow.com/how_5148881_create-load-duration-curve.html Percent of time the flow was exceeded
If collecting one sample • Decide on weather conditions: wet or dry • Tackle dry weather issues first • It is easier and they compound wet weather problems
Wet Weather Sampling Program Elements • Patience • Luck
Write a Sampling Plan to Define the… • Goals of the data collection effort • Staff responsibilities • Sampling locations • Number of sampling events • Sample collection conditions, equipment, methods and frequency (samples per event) • QC sample frequency • Analytical methods • Data analyses to be performed
Sample Collection Options Automatic Sampling • Considerations • Power source and sustainability • NiCad battery • Marine battery • Solar panel vs battery change out • Enable conditions • Exceedence of a threshold (flow, rainfall or an insitu parameter) • Manual trigger • Time trigger • Sample pacing • Timed, Flow-weighted • Sample bottling • Composite, discrete, combination of both • Equipment maintenance
Sample Collection OptionsManual Sampling • Considerations • Staff availability • # of staff needed will depend on the # of sampling locations • Make sure you cover holidays, nights and weekends • When to mobilize? • Smaller drainage areas: At the onset of the rain • Larger drainage areas: After a response in the hydrograph • Sample pacing • Timed, usually a function of the number of available staff • Sample bottling • Composite, discrete, combination of both
Parameters • Conducting the sample collection is most of the work; why not kill 2 birds with 1 stone? • Add other analytes that may help with diagnosing the source • E. coli and Total Phosphorus • BOD, SOD, COD, DO, TSS, ortho-phos, nitrogen series, chloride, surfactants, etc. • Bacterial source tracking
Number of Sampling Events • Minimum: 5 at a site • 1 year • Preferred: 10 or as many as possible • 2 years
Number of Samples per Event • Minimum = 6 • 2 on the rising limb of the hydrograph • 2 at the peak • 2 on the falling limb
Discrete vs Composite • For composite samples • Flow weight during sample collection • Flow weight after sample collection using stream flow data. This allows you to select specific samples. • Use discrete samples • For E. coli Discrete sample collection verses Composite
Quality Control Samples • Duplicates and blanks: 1 in 20 • Collect in the same manner as site sample • To determine precision calculate the relative percent difference (RPD). • For Phosphorus • RPD=[(difference of 2 values)/(mean of 2 values)] x 100% • RPD should be ≤ 20% • For E. coli • Refer to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
Preservation and Hold Times • Total Phosphorus • Sulfuric acid to pH = 2 and ice to 4°C • HT = 28 days • E. coli • Ice to 4°C • HT = 6 hours for regulatory samples or up to 24 hours for non-regulatory samples
Analyzing Data: Median Phosphorus Conc. (mg/L) Dry Wet 0.02 0.03 0.14 0.08 0.02 0.36 0.07 0.08 0.31 0.02 0.19 0.26 0.14 0.14 0.23 0.05 0.46 0.62 0.14 0.42 US EPA’s recommended limit: 0.033 mg/L
Analyzing Data: Frequency Distribution Based on daily geometric mean values (cfu/100 mL)
Summary • Wet weather sampling is very labor intensive by automatic or manual means • Clearly define the objectives of the sampling on the onset • Plan for hiccups in your sampling plan • And keep in mind, you will never be able to sleep through a rain event again
Questions? Annette DeMaria ademaria@ectinc.com 586-465-2583